Skip to main content

State Significant Development

Determination

301 and 305 Kent Street Concept Hotel Development

City of Sydney

Current Status: Determination

Interact with the stages for their names

  1. SEARs
  2. Prepare EIS
  3. Exhibition
  4. Collate Submissions
  5. Response to Submissions
  6. Assessment
  7. Recommendation
  8. Determination

A 26 Storey hotel development with ancillary uses

Attachments & Resources

Request for SEARs (1)

EIS (27)

Response to Submissions (8)

Agency Advice (6)

Additional Information (9)

Recommendation (3)

Determination (4)

Approved Documents

There are no post approval documents available

Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.

Complaints

Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?

Make a Complaint

Enforcements

There are no enforcements for this project.

Inspections

There are no inspections for this project.

Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.

Submissions

Filters
Showing 1 - 10 of 10 submissions
GIOVANNI CIRILLO
Comment
BARANGAROO , New South Wales
Message
I have reviewed the concept design for the project.

I am the applicant for a current development application proposing commercial / residential development on the adjacent site at 82-84 Sussex Street Sydney (to the west of the subject site).

I note where the subject building envelope exceeds 45m in height, the proposal fails to comply with Sydney DCP 2012 Section 5.1.2.2 (5) which requires that "Above a height of 45m, a setback of 12m is required from the side or rear boundary for residential buildings, serviced apartments or hotels to ensure visual privacy is achieved between dwellings".

In this case, a setback of 6m is proposed which does not comply with SDCP2012 S 5.1.2.2(5). Accordingly, it is requested that any determination include conditions requiring privacy screening on the common boundary above 45m in height.

It is further requested that any determination require detailed geotechnical investigations into the extent and stability of sandstone beneath the subject site given the extent of boundary excavation proposed.
Dexus
Comment
Sydney , New South Wales
Message
To whom it may concern,
Please see attached submission in relation to SSD9694.
Please note the co-owners are Dexus and AMP.
Regards,
Matt Dingwall
Attachments
Ausgrid
Comment
Haymarket , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
Sydney Airport
Comment
Mascot , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
Office of Environment and Heritage
Comment
Parramatta , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
City of Sydney Council
Comment
Sydney Water
Comment
Parramatta , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
Transport for New South Wales
Comment
Haymarket , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
Sydney Trains
Comment
Burwood , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
Heritage NSW
Comment
Parramatta , New South Wales
Message
Attachments

Pagination

Project Details

Application Number
SSD-9694
Assessment Type
State Significant Development
Development Type
Accommodation
Local Government Areas
City of Sydney
Decision
Approved
Determination Date
Decider
Executive Director

Contact Planner

Name
Rodger Roppolo