MILLERS POINT
,
New South Wales
Message
There has been no evidence provided as to why this is required. It wasn't required before so why is it required now.
The EIS states "Option 2: Do Nothing - The Crown Sydney Hotel Resort has always proposed to include part hotel and part residential uses, as envisaged under the Barangaroo Concept Plan. The redevelopment of Barangaroo and the ongoing operations of approved buildings is contingent on the ability for the individual buildings to be released to the market, critical in achieving the desired future outcome for Barangaroo South. Not creating the proposed stratums would significantly hinder the establishment and operation of the Crown Sydney Hotel Resort."
This statement suggests that this is dealing with different building when it's dealing with an individual building. It also just states it will "significantly hinder" the operation etc without any detail, where is the evidence or argument for this?