Moorebank Intermodal Precinct West - Stage 3

I support the long standing argued and exhibited case by local citizens and Liverpool City Council that the site is not suitable for the purpose and as such is not in the Public Interest. I understand the NSW Planning Law under S4.15 of the EPA Act requires specific and proper evaluation of this proposal as to the site's suitability and of it being in the Public Interest. We expect the planning authorities to apply the law in a fair, open and accountable way.

See Attached Letter and Note

A Land status investigation on Moorebank Intermodal Precinct West - Stage 3 SSD (10431), Lot 1 DP 1197707, Lots 100 - 101 DP 1049508 shows that there is no Crown Land features exist’.
However, given the context of Moorebank Precinct West (MPW) Stage 3 in relatively close proximity to the Georges River , a major Crown waterway, further comment is considered desirable.
MPW Stage 3 (SSD-10431) is essentially proposed within Lot 1 DP1197707 sited on Australian Government land. Stage 3 is located at the south eastern end of the overall MPW proposal.

On the western side of Stage 3, also on Australian Government land, is a large ‘Biodiversity Area’, which borders and will drain to the Georges River (a Crown waterway).
DPIE Crown Lands has been involved in assessing a licence for drainage from the overall MPW proposal via detention basins within the Biodiversity Area, to discharge to the Georges River. The Crown land areas required for licence on the Georges river are outside the Australian Government land property boundary.
The Biodiversity Area within the Australian Government land is approx. 100 to 200 metres wide, which is also the separation between MPW Stage 3 and the Georges River.

In summary, no Crown land is directly affected by the MPW Stage 3 proposal. However drainage from the MPW Stage 3 proposal would enter the Georges River (a Crown waterway) via Inlet structures partly on Crown land, via the Biodiversity Area on Australian Government land.

Please find official submission attached

I support the long standing argued and exhibited case by local citizens and Liverpool City Council that the site is NOT suitable for the purpose and as such is not in the Public Interest.
I understand the NSW Planning Law under S4.15 of the EPA Act requires specific and proper evaluation of this proposal as to the site's suitability and of it being in the Public Interest. We expect the planning authorities to apply the law in a fair, open and accountable way.

Objection to Moorebank Intermodal Stage SSD10432

As a resident of Campbelltown I realise we will be expected to deal with air pollution and heat generated from the Badgerys Creek Airport at least 70,000 new homes and we should not be expected to cope with the extra air pollution, heat from concrete roofs etc., once the Intermodal is completed.

Further to this the extra trains and vehicles expected to enter into an overcrowded public transport railway system and already over congested roads from the Intermodal is in humane and will further endanger the lives of children living in the Campbelltown, Liverpool and Macarthur regions.

A Report undertaken by Dr. Sebastian Pfautsch Benchmarking heat across Campbelltown has already highlighted the problem of excessive heat across Campbelltown and clearly indicates that the future of the region is under threat, our children are already having to deal with demountable classrooms that cannot cope with existing heat, Climate change will increase temperatures by at least two degrees and urban growth will add at least three or four degrees to the problem.

This year temperatures recorded at the Campbelltown monitoring station on top of Mount Annan which is surrounded by the Australian Botanic Gardens reached 45.09 degrees (1.5 degrees hotter than the previous year) and this is not considered a true indication of heat within the Campbelltown CBD again taken from Dr. Pfautsche’s report

Sutherland council is at the moment compiling a report into an extra 5 or 6 degrees in the future, and Campbelltown council has installed a small green wall and talk about planting trees, but in reality the wall would probably have to be larger than the Great China Wall to have any effect on mitigating the existing heat we have to experience without adding to this by building the Intermodal, airport or over one million homes across Western Sydney.

Submission attached.

Submission attached.

Submission attached.

I am Against this development.
I support the long standing argued and exhibited case by local citizens and Liverpool City Council that the site is not suitable for the purpose and as such is not in the Public Interest. I understand the NSW Planning Law under S4.15 of the EPA Act requires specific and proper evaluation of this proposal as to the site's suitability and of it being in the Public Interest. We expect the planning authorities to apply the law in a fair, open and accountable way.

Liverpool City Council was invited to comment on the Moorebank Intermodal West Stage3 (MPW Stage 3) State Significant Development Application (SSD-10431). It is notedthat Council previously submitted advice regarding the request for Secretary’sEnvironmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs). That advice is attached for yourinformation and forms part of this submission.

Please see the attached letter from the NSW EPA regarding the Moorebank Intermodal Precinct West - Stage 3

Attached.