Skip to main content

State Significant Development

Determination

Russell Vale Underground Expansion

Wollongong City

Current Status: Determination

Interact with the stages for their names

  1. SEARs
  2. Prepare EIS
  3. Exhibition
  4. Collate Submissions
  5. Assessment
  6. Recommendation
  7. Determination

Wollongong Coal Limited is seeking approval to extend mining operations by means of first workings mining techniques and upgrade of associated surface facilities at the Russell Vale Colliery in the Southern Coalfield.

Modifications

Response to Submissions

Archive

Application (4)

DGRs (1)

EA (9)

Submissions (3)

Agency Submissions (17)

Public Hearing (11)

Response to Submissions (3)

Amendments (3)

Additional Information (10)

Recommendation (11)

Determination (3)

Approved Documents

Management Plans and Strategies (45)

Reports (2)

Independent Reviews and Audits (2)

Other Documents (6)

Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.

Complaints

Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?

Make a Complaint

Enforcements

There are no enforcements for this project.

Inspections

There are no inspections for this project.

Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.

Submissions

Filters
Showing 121 - 140 of 204 submissions
Mark Gawne
Object
Gwynneville , New South Wales
Message
I object to the Wollongong Coal's Revised Preferred Project Report (PPR)
to the Russell Vale Underground Expansion Project 09-0013.

Some of the reasons for my objection are listed below.

Climate change and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions

Coal mining, whether for energy or steelmaking, produces the GHG
Emissions that are causing dangerous climate change. This project is
estimated to result in 11,624,000 tonnes of GHG emissions through the
mining and the burning of the coal.

A risk to Greater Sydney Water Catchment

The mining will take place in the Special Areas of the Greater Sydney
Water Catchment - areas that forbid public access because of their
sensitivity and strategic importance - and up to the shores of the
Cataract Reservoir.
Not only will the mining infrastructure, such as access roads and vent
shafts, disturb and damage the catchment, the proposal for Bord and
Pillar mining will result in up to 100 mm in subsidence.
The extraction for the Wonga Central Development Mains extends under
the Cataract Reservoir itself. Cataract is severely affected by
drought and is currently at only 29% of capacity. Mining should not be
permitted anywhere near Great Sydney water supply reservoirs.

Triple seam mining

The mining is particularly risky because a third seam of coal is being
mined beneath two previously mined seams. Triple seam mining has
little precedent and impacts are difficult to predict.
The proponent admits that instability in the overlaying old Bulli seam
workings may cause pillar collapse and subsequent subsidence of 1 to 2
metres. It is unacceptable of the NSW government to allow such risky
mining in the water catchment for 5 million people of Greater Sydney
in a time of drought.

The proponent is not fit and proper to hold a mining licence

Wollongong Coal and its parent company Jindal Steel and Power Ltd, are
currently the subject of an investigation by the NSW government's
Resources Regulator into whether or not they are a `fit and proper'
entity to hold a mining license. The company has a history of failing
to comply with conditions of approval. Even its auditors have
questioned its capacity to continue as a going concern; its current
liabilities exceed its current assets by nearly A$1 billion.
Wollongong Coal is not a `fit and proper' entity to operate a coal
mine in the water catchment of Australia's largest city.

Impacts on local community

The colliery site at Russell Vale is closer to dense residential areas
than any mine in Australia. Residential communities have suffered the
impacts from this mine over many years, including noise and
particulate pollution. In this day and age, Russell Vale is not a
suitable location for a colliery.
Wollongong Coal plans to build a coal processing plant at the Russell
Vale Colliery and process coal on site. The Russell Vale mine is the
closest mine to any built up residential area in Australia and is not
a suitable area for coal processing. Moreover, the proponent has been
unable or unwilling to comply with many conditions of past approvals
and the NSW government has proven to be unable or unwilling to enforce
compliance. Residents have no confidence in "conditions" or
"commitments" to operate the processing plant according to suitable
standards.

The proponent has a history of non-compliance with approval conditions

Previous applications and approvals promised numerous items to protect
the community and environment that have never been met by the
proponent. These include but are not limited to: truck loading
facilities, sound walls, covered conveyors, limited stockpiles, sealed
roadways and realignment of Bellambi Creek. Now in this new revised
project, Wollongong Coal is promising the same or similar things.
Wollongong Coal is currently operating right at this moment under
three non-compliances: the realignment of Bellambi Creek to protect it
from pollution and flooding (due Oct 2012); the removal of 200,000
tonnes of oversize coal that was illegally stockpiled on the adjoining
slag heap (due July 2019); and, the dedication of land to Council in a
1989 approval from Wollongong City Council (due 1990). All of these
obligations still have not been met.
A proponent with such a poor record of compliance should not be
considered for, let alone granted, approval to mine. The NSW
Department of Planning's inability or unwillingness to enforce
compliance (with the conditions that it itself has stipulated)
undermines confidence in the planning system.

We ask that you reject this application from Wollongong Coal and
commence a process to close the mine at Russell Vale permanently.

Thank you for considering this submission.

Yours sincerely,
Mark Gawne
Natalie Murray
Object
Maroubra , New South Wales
Message
Wollongong Coal's Revised Preferred Project Report to the Russell Vale
Underground Expansion Project:

I object to the Wollongong Coal's Revised Preferred Project Report
(PPR) to the Russell Vale Underground Expansion Project 09-0013.

Some of the reasons for my objection are listed below.

Climate change and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions

Coal mining, whether for energy or steelmaking, produces the GHG
Emissions that are causing dangerous climate change. This project is
estimated to result in 11,624,000 tonnes of GHG emissions through the
mining and the burning of the coal.
A risk to Greater Sydney Water Catchment

The mining will take place in the Special Areas of the Greater Sydney
Water Catchment - areas that forbid public access because of their
sensitivity and strategic importance - and up to the shores of the
Cataract Reservoir.
Not only will the mining infrastructure, such as access roads and vent
shafts, disturb and damage the catchment, the proposal for Bord and
Pillar mining will result in up to 100 mm in subsidence.
The extraction for the Wonga Central Development Mains extends under
the Cataract Reservoir itself. Cataract is severely affected by
drought and is currently at only 29% of capacity. Mining should not be
permitted anywhere near Great Sydney water supply reservoirs.
Triple seam mining

The mining is particularly risky because a third seam of coal is being
mined beneath two previously mined seams. Triple seam mining has
little precedent and impacts are difficult to predict.
The proponent admits that instability in the overlaying old Bulli seam
workings may cause pillar collapse and subsequent subsidence of 1 to 2
metres. It is unacceptable of the NSW government to allow such risky
mining in the water catchment for 5 million people of Greater Sydney
in a time of drought.
The proponent is not fit and proper to hold a mining licence

Wollongong Coal and its parent company Jindal Steel and Power Ltd, are
currently the subject of an investigation by the NSW government's
Resources Regulator into whether or not they are a `fit and proper'
entity to hold a mining license. The company has a history of failing
to comply with conditions of approval. Even its auditors have
questioned its capacity to continue as a going concern; its current
liabilities exceed its current assets by nearly A$1 billion.
Wollongong Coal is not a `fit and proper' entity to operate a coal
mine in the water catchment of Australia's largest city.
Impacts on local community

The colliery site at Russell Vale is closer to dense residential areas
than any mine in Australia. Residential communities have suffered the
impacts from this mine over many years, including noise and
particulate pollution. In this day and age, Russell Vale is not a
suitable location for a colliery.
Wollongong Coal plans to build a coal processing plant at the Russell
Vale Colliery and process coal on site. The Russell Vale mine is the
closest mine to any built up residential area in Australia and is not
a suitable area for coal processing. Moreover, the proponent has been
unable or unwilling to comply with many conditions of past approvals
and the NSW government has proven to be unable or unwilling to enforce
compliance. Residents have no confidence in "conditions" or
"commitments" to operate the processing plant according to suitable
standards.
The proponent has a history of non-compliance with approval conditions

Previous applications and approvals promised numerous items to protect
the community and environment that have never been met by the
proponent. These include but are not limited to: truck loading
facilities, sound walls, covered conveyors, limited stockpiles, sealed
roadways and realignment of Bellambi Creek. Now in this new revised
project, Wollongong Coal is promising the same or similar things.
Wollongong Coal is currently operating right at this moment under
three non-compliances: the realignment of Bellambi Creek to protect it
from pollution and flooding (due Oct 2012); the removal of 200,000
tonnes of oversize coal that was illegally stockpiled on the adjoining
slag heap (due July 2019); and, the dedication of land to Council in a
1989 approval from Wollongong City Council (due 1990). All of these
obligations still have not been met.
A proponent with such a poor record of compliance should not be
considered for, let alone granted, approval to mine. The NSW
Department of Planning's inability or unwillingness to enforce
compliance (with the conditions that it itself has stipulated)
undermines confidence in the planning system.
We ask that you reject this application from Wollongong Coal and
commence a process to close the mine at Russell Vale permanently.

Thank you for considering this submission.

Yours sincerely,
Natalie
Brian Hemsworth
Support
Gordon , New South Wales
Message
I support the Project as extending the life of the Russel Vale Colliery
which would benefit the community and local businesses whilst
sustaining a number of employment opportunities.
Australian Winch & Haulage Co. Pty. Ltd
Support
Smithfield , New South Wales
Message
We support the Project as the revised board and pillar mining method
minimises subsidence to very low levels with minimal impacts to
groundwater and the catchment area. The continued operation of the
Russel Vale Colliery will continue mine employment and provide ongoing
economic contribution for the Illawarra and community.
Magi Carmody
Object
Gymea Bay , New South Wales
Message
I am extremely concerned with the seeming bias towards prioritising coal
over water in government decisions. The expansion of mining in
situations that put the integrity of the Greater Sydney Catchment at
risk is shortsighted and against the interests and wellbeing of
citizens. There is overwhelming evidence of past problems.
Please reject this proposal.

I also urge the Ministry to create a thinktank and fund a major
recycling plant and incubator for transitional job provision to
support families who would otherwise be dependent on the coal industry
in catchment areas. People should not have to sacrifice drinking water
and pristine areas in order to support their families.
Bitz Excavations Pty Ltd
Support
Woonona , New South Wales
Message
We wish to advise that we support the Russell Vale Underground Expansion
Project. We have been working with Wollongong Coal for the passed 12
years. They have provided continuous work during this time which has
allowed us to update and expand and as well we have been able to
provide jobs for many employees in this area. Without us receiving
this work from Wollongong Coal these employees would either not have a
job or be offered work out of the region which in turn put a lot of
added pressure on relationships with spouses being required to work
away from home to be able to support.
Matthew Skellett
Object
Terrigal , New South Wales
Message
This project is pure madness and will spell disaster for our water - all
the State Govt cares about is the short term gains and when the
disaster unfolds the people responsible will wash their hands of any
responsibility - total incompetence and criminal negligence is in the
offing .
Mick Payne
Support
Berrima , New South Wales
Message
I support the Project as the revised bord and pillar mining method
minimises subsidence to very low levels with minimal impacts to
groundwater and the catchment area. The continued operation of the
Russell Vale Colliery will continue mine employment and provide
ongoing economic contribution for the Illawarra and community.

It makes sense to support the expansion of an existing mine with
infrastructure in place rather than a new mine being approved and
developed
Glenn Bartho
Support
Jewells , New South Wales
Message
I support the Project as the revised bord and pillar mining method
minimises subsidence to very low levels with minimal impacts to
groundwater and the catchment area. The continued operation of the
Russell Vale Colliery will continue employment opportunities both
directly and indirectly putting money back into the community.
Carole Carter
Object
Austinmer , New South Wales
Message
Wollongong Coal's Revised Preferred Project Report to the Russell Vale
Underground Expansion Project:
I object to the Wollongong Coal's Revised Preferred Project Report
(PPR) to the Russell Vale Underground Expansion Project 09-0013.
Some of the reasons for my objection are listed below.
Climate change and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions
Coal mining, whether for energy or steelmaking, produces the GHG
Emissions that are causing dangerous climate change. This project is
estimated to result in 11,624,000 tonnes of GHG emissions through the
mining and the burning of the coal.
A risk to Greater Sydney Water Catchment
The mining will take place in the Special Areas of the Greater Sydney
Water Catchment - areas that forbid public access because of their
sensitivity and strategic importance - and up to the shores of the
Cataract Reservoir.
Not only will the mining infrastructure, such as access roads and vent
shafts, disturb and damage the catchment, the proposal for Bord and
Pillar mining will result in up to 100 mm in subsidence.
The extraction for the Wonga Central Development Mains extends under
the Cataract Reservoir itself. Cataract is severely affected by
drought and is currently at only 29% of capacity. Mining should not be
permitted anywhere near Great Sydney water supply reservoirs.
Triple seam mining
The mining is particularly risky because a third seam of coal is being
mined beneath two previously mined seams. Triple seam mining has
little precedent and impacts are difficult to predict.
The proponent admits that instability in the overlaying old Bulli seam
workings may cause pillar collapse and subsequent subsidence of 1 to 2
metres. It is unacceptable of the NSW government to allow such risky
mining in the water catchment for 5 million people of Greater Sydney
in a time of drought.
The proponent is not fit and proper to hold a mining licence
Wollongong Coal and its parent company Jindal Steel and Power Ltd, are
currently the subject of an investigation by the NSW government's
Resources Regulator into whether or not they are a `fit and proper'
entity to hold a mining license. The company has a history of failing
to comply with conditions of approval. Even its auditors have
questioned its capacity to continue as a going concern; its current
liabilities exceed its current assets by nearly A$1 billion.
Wollongong Coal is not a `fit and proper' entity to operate a coal
mine in the water catchment of Australia's largest city.
Impacts on local community
The colliery site at Russell Vale is closer to dense residential areas
than any mine in Australia. Residential communities have suffered the
impacts from this mine over many years, including noise and
particulate pollution. In this day and age, Russell Vale is not a
suitable location for a colliery.
Wollongong Coal plans to build a coal processing plant at the Russell
Vale Colliery and process coal on site. The Russell Vale mine is the
closest mine to any built up residential area in Australia and is not
a suitable area for coal processing. Moreover, the proponent has been
unable or unwilling to comply with many conditions of past approvals
and the NSW government has proven to be unable or unwilling to enforce
compliance. Residents have no confidence in "conditions" or
"commitments" to operate the processing plant according to suitable
standards.
The proponent has a history of non-compliance with approval conditions
Previous applications and approvals promised numerous items to protect
the community and environment that have never been met by the
proponent. These include but are not limited to: truck loading
facilities, sound walls, covered conveyors, limited stockpiles, sealed
roadways and realignment of Bellambi Creek. Now in this new revised
project, Wollongong Coal is promising the same or similar things.
Wollongong Coal is currently operating right at this moment under
three non-compliances: the realignment of Bellambi Creek to protect it
from pollution and flooding (due Oct 2012); the removal of 200,000
tonnes of oversize coal that was illegally stockpiled on the adjoining
slag heap (due July 2019); and, the dedication of land to Council in a
1989 approval from Wollongong City Council (due 1990). All of these
obligations still have not been met.
A proponent with such a poor record of compliance should not be
considered for, let alone granted, approval to mine. The NSW
Department of Planning's inability or unwillingness to enforce
compliance (with the conditions that it itself has stipulated)
undermines confidence in the planning system.
We ask that you reject this application from Wollongong Coal and
commence a process to close the mine at Russell Vale permanently.
Thank you for considering this submission.
Yours sincerely,
Carole Carter
Mine & Tunnel Constructions Pty Ltd
Support
Wyong , New South Wales
Message
I support extending the life of mine for Russell Vale Colliery because it
will secure employment for the proposed workforce of 205 employees and
will provides an additional 22 jobs during the construction phase of
the project.
The extension of the mine life will also benefit our Company which has
been involved in providing support services for Wollongong Coal over
the last 4 years.
Wayne Sly
Support
Kiama , New South Wales
Message
I support the submission by Wollongong Coal to recommence mining
operations at Russell Vale mine. They have committed to first workings
mining techniques which will remove further subsidence impacts on the
surface. This significantly reduces any environmental impact on the
overlying catchment areas for Sydney's water supply. Balanced against
the management of the environmental concerns are the community
benefits - employment, taxes and other revenue, use of local suppliers
and services and wider structural benefits to other local, regional
and state stakeholders.
The application is responsible to both environmental and community
benefits.
The other areas addressed in its submission are not unique to any
other sizeable business in the Illawarra. They have addressed the
design and operating requirements to meet statutory requirements.
Again, I support the Wollongong Coal application to resume mining at
Russell Vale.
Overall, I
Name Withheld
Support
moorebank , New South Wales
Message
I believe that the Russel vale project is an excellent addition to the
NSW/Wollongong area.
This project provides thousands of jobs for locals and companies a
like and also provides necessary coal to industries and Australia

I am fully in support of this site being reopened for cutting and
can't wait to see it operational once more
Name Withheld
Object
Heathcote , New South Wales
Message
Thank you for taking the time to read my submission.

There are few constants in this life the need for shelter, food, water
and clothing have not changed.

We need water to survive, we do not require coal to survive.

We must protect our water supply to protect our future.

Without water we do not have life.

Please ensure we all have access to pristine water not just a few have
access to coal/money.

Please do not allow mining endanger the water supply.
Nicole Van Barneveld
Object
Neutral Bay , New South Wales
Message
I am opposed to any expansion of Russell Vale mining in the greater
Sydney Water Catchment. Especially now in the middle of a drought,
protection of our water is critical. I have no faith in ensuring that
the expansion plans are safe and will not threaten our water supply.

After multiple incidents, the miner has demonstrated that it is not
able to comply with important environmental conditions.

Protection of our drinking water is critical and should take priority
over mining. I reject this proposal and urge you to not approve any
expansion of mining around our drinking water catchment.
Kevin Gorick
Support
Dapto , New South Wales
Message
I support the Project as the revised bord and pillar mining method
minimises subsidence to very low levels with minimal impacts to
groundwater and the catchment area. The continued operation of the
Russell Vale Colliery will continue mine employment and provide
ongoing economic contribution for the Illawarra and community.
Name Withheld
Object
Waterfall , New South Wales
Message
I would like to voice my strong opposition to this proposal on the simple
and logical point that drinking water is move valuable and infinitely
more important than coal or a companies profits. Given the already
undeniable and extremely negative impacts caused to the Woronora Dam
and the surrounding catchment caused by the current underground
operations, extending further under the dam beggars belief.

I value a reliable, clean drinking water supply that I care about some
coal company's profit. All I ask is that common sense and a view to
the future prevail and this expansion does not proceed.
Philip Laird
Object
Keiraville , New South Wales
Message
I write to object to the Wollongong Coal's Revised Preferred Project
Report (PPR) to the Russell Vale Underground Expansion Project
09-0013.
Some of the reasons for my objection are listed below.

A risk to Greater Sydney Water Catchment
* The mining will take place in the Special Areas of the Greater
Sydney Water Catchment. These are areas that forbid public access
because of their sensitivity and strategic importance .Not only will
the mining infrastructure, such as access roads and vent shafts,
disturb and damage the catchment, the proposal for Board and Pillar
mining could result in up to 100 mm in subsidence.
* The extraction for the Wonga Central Development Mains extends under
the Cataract Reservoir itself. This reservoir is severely affected by
drought and is currently at only 29% of capacity. Mining should not be
permitted anywhere near Great Sydney water supply reservoirs.

Triple seam mining
* The mining could be problematic because a third seam of coal is
being mined beneath two previously mined seams. Triple seam mining has
little precedent and impacts are difficult to predict.
* The proponent admits that instability in the overlaying old Bulli
seam workings may cause pillar collapse and subsequent subsidence of 1
to 2 metres. It is unacceptable of the NSW government to allow such
mining in the water catchment for 5 million people of Greater Sydney
in a time of drought.

Trucking
* ยท The coal is due to trucked along Bellambi Lane, past people's
homes onto the Northern Distributor to Port Kembla Coal Terminal.
WCL's new expansion proposal means more coal trucks on the busy
Memorial Drive. There will be an average of 16 laden trucks per hour,
Monday to Saturday, travelling to the port In other words, counting
the return trip, there will be 32 truck movements per hour, or one
truck every 112 seconds. In addition to this there will be more coal
trucks transporting coal mining waste.
* Wollongong's main roads to Port Kembla have no shortage of coal
trucks, now over five million tonnes per annum (mtpa) to the Coal
Terminal and with the prospect of 10 mtpa, plus more coal to the steel
works. Plus car carrying trucks since 2008, and approval in mid 2011
to expand Port Kembla Outer Harbour with more big trucks.
* These cumulative impacts increased following a determination by the
Planning and Assessment Commission in December 2011 (as noted in the
Illawarra Mercury of 2 and 3 December 2011) to approve an application
to lift road haulage of grain to Port Kembla from 200,000 to 500,000
tonnes per annum.
* On top of the coal and the grain along with general freight and car
imports, there are now extra quarry products on Mt Ousley and other
roads (Hanson's Bass Point Quarry and Boral's Dunmore Quarry).
* No other city in Australia is subject to this imposition of bulk
haulage by road with its increased road crash risk, noise and air
pollution, plus road congestion. To add insult to injury, the
operations of the heavier trucks are arguably subsidised by lower fuel
taxation (than for cars) and for the road damage big trucks that
travel large distances each year, fixed annual registration charges.

Impacts on local community
* The colliery site at Russell Vale is closer to dense residential
areas than any mine in Australia. Residential communities have
suffered the impacts from this mine over many years, including noise
and particulate pollution. In this day and age, Russell Vale is not a
suitable location for a colliery.
* Wollongong Coal plans to build a coal processing plant at the
Russell Vale Colliery and process coal on site. The Russell Vale mine
is the closest mine to any built up residential area in Australia and
is not a suitable area for coal processing.
The proponent has a history of non-compliance with approval conditions
* Previous applications and approvals promised numerous items to
protect the community and environment that have not always been met by
the proponent. These include but are not limited to: truck loading
facilities, sound walls, covered conveyors, limited stockpiles, sealed
roadways and realignment of Bellambi Creek. Now in this new revised
project, Wollongong Coal is promising the same or similar things.
* Wollongong Coal appears to be currently operating right at this
moment under three non-compliances: the realignment of Bellambi Creek
to protect it from pollution and flooding (due Oct 2012); the removal
of 200,000 tonnes of oversize coal that was illegally stockpiled on
the adjoining slag heap (due July 2019); and, the dedication of land
to Council in a 1989 approval from Wollongong City Council (due 1990).
All of these obligations still have not been met.
* A proponent with such a poor record of compliance should not be
considered for, let alone granted, approval to mine.
Climate change and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions
* Coal mining, whether for energy or steelmaking, produces the GHG
Emissions that are causing dangerous climate change. This project is
estimated to result in 11,624,000 tonnes of GHG emissions through the
mining and the burning of the coal.

I ask that you reject this application from Wollongong Coal.
Consideration should also be given to commence a process to close the
mine at Russell Vale permanently.


Thank you for considering this submission.
Name Withheld
Object
Balgownie , New South Wales
Message
I write on behalf of my young family who have moved to the Illawarra from
Sydney. We are adamantly opposed to the expansion and proposed works
of this project. The area is highly urbanised and represents an
immense health risk to residents and locals. The impacts on traffic
congestion, heavy vehicle impact on maintaining road infrastructure,
and health impacts of increased heavy vehicle movements are all
negatives. Perversely these are some of the very issues that we were
facing in Sydney which we were aiming to leave behind by moving to the
South Coast. The benefits of the expansion are minimal with only a
small number of jobs being created, none of which can be guaranteed to
be permanent, nor guaranteed to be filled by local talent. We are
particularly concerned by the instability of the land surrounding the
area and as potential home buyers in the area we feel this is very
concerning for potential and existing residents' home values and
safety. The proposal should also be declined on the basis of the
environmental costs from outdated and old fashioned energy source of
coal, and the unsuitability of allowing this to take place in the
Cataract catchment - an area that should be kept pristine with every
effort made to reduce risk of contamination in the catchment for both
ground and surface waters. Finally, we have no faith that the
applicant will abide with any undertakings given as part of the
approval process as they have a long record of non compliance. There
is no reason to believe that the applicant can or will take any
measures to ensure licensing compliance,which makes us even more
concerned that if something should go very wrong that this company
would not act appropriately regarding environmental or operational
disasters.
Ouita Spalding
Object
Bulli , New South Wales
Message
What a terrible idea.
Any project which is going to increase CO2 emissions should be
regarded as foolish and contrary to Australia's global obligations.
Climate change is destroying our planet and way of life.
Mining coal is not even economically viable any more.

Pagination

Project Details

Application Number
MP09_0013
Assessment Type
State Significant Development
Development Type
Coal Mining
Local Government Areas
Wollongong City
Decision
Approved
Determination Date
Decider
IPC-N

Contact Planner

Name
Genevieve Lucas