The Collaroy Narrabeen area is not appropriate for this area.
3 levels of basement parking 192 car spots and 6 storeys above ground is excessive for the area. Infrastructure is not present to support this number of residents, workers and visitors. The Northern Beaches hospital is not functioning well, adding more eldery would be disastrous. Public transport is minimal in this area. The roads are congested already, to introduce that many more cars places a sentence of traffic jams forever. Woolworths parking is already dismal, as is parking in Narrabeen. The area is a known risj area for storms due to sea surges and flooding. How will you keep eldery safe in these big storms

This project is a disgrace, we do not have the facilities, roads, parking, or infrastructure on the North Narrabeen Peninsula for hundreds of more people.

There is not a single building over 3 stories high on ocean st and it would be a major eye sore.

This building does not solve any housing problems in the area as it is only luxury apartments for the elderly.

The scale of the project needs to be reduced dramatically. Should not be more than 3 stories high and the number of apartments needs to be cut in half as well. The streets around this build are already choked up in the evenings and it’s a night mare to park as it is.

When 131 Lagoon St Narrabeen was constructed, the kerbside parking became so congested that to travel down that area of Lagoon St you had to wait for incoming traffic as only 1 car fits at a time. My family sometimes has to park 4 streets away for a car park. With more units being built there is no parking anywhere. These new units being built in Ocean Street have only 7 visitor car spaces, what a joke. For 2-bedroom apartments there should also be 2 car spaces. Lagoon Street is constantly gridlocked, and I have had quite a few near accidents with impatient drivers.

With regard to the height of the buildings, I believe 4 storeys keeps it in line with the other units. Neighboring houses will be overshadowed and lose privacy if its too high. Do we really want to create another Dee Why in Narrabeen.

Objection to Indigo by Moran – 156 Ocean Street Narrabeen (SSD-76220734)

1. This 5 Storey building, plus rooftop terrace overlooking Ocean Street, while inconsistent with Narrabeen’s environment and all Northern Beaches suburbs north of Dee Why, is inequitable and grievously disadvantages the local community.

• Residential buildings on Narrabeen Peninsula, Narrabeen itself and all the Northern Beaches suburbs north of Dee Why consist predominately of single and two-storey dwellings, and unit blocks of two to three storeys.
• This proposed five-storey building plus rooftop terrace introduces an inappropriate level of bulk and scale that is out of context with the established neighbourhood. The height (21.1+ metres) and dimensions are inconsistent with the neighbouring buildings and will detract from the visual harmony and the local streetscape’s sense of unity and balance.
• This proposal will, contrary to local planning objectives, dominate Narrabeen Peninsula and the views of the Peninsula from Collaroy Plateau, North Narrabeen, Elanora, and Pittwater Road on the eastern side of Narrabeen Lagoon.

2. Non-Compliance with Height Controls

• The proposed height of 21.1 metres (which does not appear to include the rooftop Terrace) exceeds the permissible height limit by more than 8.8 metres, even after accounting for the increase allowed under the State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability 2004).
This represents an unjustifiable breach of planning controls undermining the integrity of the local planning framework and is inconsistent with the height objectives of Northern Beaches Local Environmental Plan (LEP) and Development Control Plan (DCP).

3. Impact on Neighbours and Public Areas

• The height and bulk of the proposal will dominate all neighbouring properties and obstruct sunlight and ocean breezes.
• The illustrations provided by the applicant are misleading, as they fail to accurately depict the relationship between the proposed height and neighbourhood dwellings,
This misrepresentation of scale and visual impact significantly underplays the true extent of visual obstruction the proposal will cause.

4. Inadequate Setbacks and Failure to Provide Height Transition

• The proposal incorporates inadequate side and rear setbacks, which does not accurately illustrate the perception of bulk and demonstrate scale compared to neighbouring low-density dwellings, and its impacts on visual dominance, overshadowing, and privacy loss rather than integrating sensitively with Narrabeen’s urban character.

5. Removal of Significant Vegetation
• The proposal involves the removal of three established Norfolk Pines fronting Lagoon Street which may hold ecological value for local wildlife and alleviate a portion of the visual impact of the proposal.

6. Adverse Microclimatic Impacts (Wind and Heat)

• The development’s excessive bulk will alter local movement of air, resulting in reduced natural circulation for surrounding dwellings, the diversion of prevailing cooling ocean breezes that currently mitigate summer heat, and create an immobile microclimate likely to augment urban heat island effects.

• These impacts will reduce residential comfort for neighbouring properties and weaken environmental sustainability outcomes for the neighbourhood.

7. Insufficient Car Parking and Traffic Impacts

• The proposal includes inadequate parking provision for residents, staff and visitors, contrary to the requirements of the SEPP and Council’s DCP. This shortfall will force overflow parking onto surrounding residential streets, exacerbating existing parking scarcity, and increase traffic congestion and safety risks on local roads not designed to accommodate higher volumes that are already under extreme pressure, especially from weekend beachgoers.

8. Overdevelopment and Excessive use of the Site
• The proposal represents a clear overdevelopment of the site, with a density, height, and scale far exceeding what is suitable for the locality and exaggerates the use of State Significant Development under the guise of “Over 55’s housing” while failing to deliver genuine SSD benefits or design excellence that would justify such an excessive variation. The proposal compromises residential amenity, environmental quality, and visual character.

9. LMR Stage 2-2025

The new State Government LMR controls for the Northern Beaches apply to all residential zoned land within 800 metres walking distance of:

• Balgowlah Stockland Shopping Centre
• Dee Why Town Centre
• Forestville Town Centre
• Forestway Shopping Centre
• Frenchs Forest Precinct (Warringah Road)
• Manly Town Centre
• Manly Vale Town Centre
• Mona Vale Town Centre
• Warringah Mall Shopping Centre
Following Northern Beaches Council submissions, four town centres that had originally been proposed to be included in the Stage 2 Reforms have been excluded: Warriewood, Narrabeen, Newport, and Belrose.

The zones were excluded after significant community consultation and objections over the density and height changes in these four areas which was ultimately accepted by the Government demonstrating agreement with the submissions including that Narrabeen should not be part of the Stage 2 Reforms.

The application by Moran seeks to impose on Narrabeen a commercial development at heights that are available under the Stage 2 Reforms when Narrabeen has been specifically excluded from the Stage 2 Reforms. It is not appropriate to permit a five level (21.1 metres) development that will be almost double the permissible height for buildings in the area. Moran seeks an unfair advantage and a use that is significantly beyond that available to others in the community.

10. Lack of consultation

While there have been two public meetings there has been no consultation that would qualify as “extensive community participation” that I am aware of and I question the genuineness of Moran’s claimed public consultation.

The Development Application should not be considered until the State is satisfied there has been adequate and appropriate consultation and everyone that will be affected by the development has been consulted with an opportunity to make submissions after understanding the nature of the proposed development and had the opportunity to object to the development.

11. If the Government were to consider approval:

I suspect Moran recognised prior to its submission that they have little to no chance of obtaining approval as the development is currently proposed and that they will resubmit with a compromise proposal to indicate they are listening to the people and that this compromise will still be well outside the guidelines. Again, I suspect this will most likely be approved which would create a highly undesirable precedent, encouraging more developers to seek other non-complying developments in height, bulk, and scale.

Subsequent approval would therefore need to ensure Moran’s revised DA goes back for genuine community consultation and is redesigned to:

• Comply with the maximum height and full setback controls,
• Reduce visual and environmental impacts, and
• Provide adequate parking (including visitors) and genuine height transitions to adjoining properties.

12. Conclusion

In summary, this proposed commercial development in the guise of Over 55s accommodation is:

• Excessively tall and bulky with adverse social and environment ramifications,
• Inconsistent with the existing and designated character of the area,
• Non-compliant with height and setback controls,
• Likely to generate significant amenity and traffic impacts.

The application is extreme and represents an excessive use of the site in relation to its neighbouring environment and should be refused outright for attempting to exploit the SSD process and bypass the State approved Northern Beaches LEP.

The project height is well above the current development control plans for this location.
In my opinion this project will be detrimental to the streetscape for Ocean Street & if it’s approved will set a dangerous precedent for future developments.
The current site is an older aged care facility & upgrading site to accommodate the local demand is welcomed but taking advantage of the size is not appreciated by the community.
The developer needs to revise the plans immediately & lower the height to fit into the current streetscape of Ocean Street.

I have lived in Narrabeen for 64 years and in that time have seen many changes.
In the 60’s the Narrabeen peninsula was booming with numerous units being built with a height restriction of 3 stories with the exception of a couple that got thru planning. There have been new units built since and again with height restrictions which the infrastructure can cope with.
In the mean time roads and have not improved nor parking in the area. I strongly disagree with this proposal as it is unsuitable for the area.
‘

I am writing to formally object to the proposed 6-storey development on Ocean Street, Narrabeen. I am a home owner around the corner and am deeply concerned about the scale and impact of this project on the character, amenity, and liveability of our community.
1. Inappropriate Height and Scale
A 6-storey building is completely out of character with the existing built form of Narrabeen. The proposed height will dominate the surrounding streetscape, create excessive overshadowing, and erode the village-style character that defines the suburb. Approving such a development would set a dangerous precedent for future overdevelopment in the area and take it closer towards Pittwater road through Dee Why.
2. Traffic and Parking Impacts
Ocean Street is already a heavily trafficked local road, particularly during school drop-off times, weekends, and summer months when beach visitors peak. The proposed development will significantly increase vehicle movements and on-street parking pressure, worsening congestion and reducing pedestrian safety.
3. Overdevelopment and Density Concerns
The proposal represents overdevelopment of the site, with a bulk and scale that is inconsistent with surrounding buildings and the intended character of the Narrabeen local centre. The Local Environment Plan (LEP) and Development Control Plan (DCP) seek to ensure that new developments maintain a human scale, protect local amenity, and respect the established pattern of development — this proposal fails to do so.
4. Loss of Local Character and Community Identity
Narrabeen is valued for its relaxed coastal atmosphere and low-rise, beachside village feel. A 6-storey development fundamentally undermines that character. Once a precedent is set, it becomes difficult to prevent further large-scale projects, changing the entire nature of the suburb and diminishing what makes it unique.
7. Precedent and Cumulative Impact
Approving this development would open the door for other oversized proposals, leading to a cumulative effect that would irreversibly alter the scale and feel of the area. This would be inconsistent with the community’s expectations and the long-standing planning vision for Narrabeen.
For these reasons, I strongly urge Council to refuse this development application or require substantial redesign to ensure it aligns with the existing planning controls, local character, and community values.
Thank you for considering this objection.

I object to the size and height of the proposed project. I thought there was a building height restriction In this area. Is It 5 or 6 stories In height ? Too few visitors parking for the number of residences, Parking In the streets Is at a premium now,
What makes It a Significant Development ? There Is nothing significant about demolishing an existing retirement village for a much larger retirement village, on the same size land. If this Development proceeds, It will bring more people and more cars to our already crowded streets and less trees.

I am writing to formally object to the proposed development SSD-76220734, which seeks approval for a 149-apartment, six-storey building at 156-164 Ocean Street, extending through to Lagoon and Octavia Streets, Narrabeen.

Executive Summary
This proposal represents a significant overdevelopment that is incompatible with the existing character of Narrabeen. It poses serious environmental, visual, and safety concerns while demonstrating inadequate regard for community consultation. I urge the planning authority to reject this application.
Environmental Impact
The proposed removal of mature native pine trees along Lagoon Street constitutes an unacceptable loss to our local ecosystem and natural landscape. These established trees provide essential habitat, contribute to local biodiversity, and form an integral part of the neighbourhood's environmental character. Their removal contradicts principles of environmental preservation that should be fundamental to contemporary urban planning.
The development fails to demonstrate adequate environmental mitigation measures or offsetting strategies for this significant loss of established vegetation.
Overdevelopment and Visual Impact
At up to 20 meters in height, this six-storey structure represents dramatic overdevelopment for this site and the surrounding area. The scale is grossly disproportionate to the existing streetscape and neighbourhood character.
Hundreds of residents, particularly those living on the escarpment, will experience direct visual impact. Views that have defined this community will be obstructed by an imposing structure that dominates the landscape rather than integrating sensitively within it.
The proposed building envelope lacks adequate setbacks and fails to provide appropriate transitional scaling to neighbouring properties and public spaces.
Traffic, Parking, and Safety Concerns
The development will introduce approximately 149 additional dwellings to an area already experiencing traffic congestion and parking shortages. The traffic impact assessment fails to adequately address:

Cumulative traffic impacts on Ocean Street and surrounding streets
Safety risks to pedestrians and cyclists on local roads
Inadequate on-site parking provision, which will displace parking demand to surrounding streets
Access and egress challenges during peak periods
Emergency vehicle access concerns

The increased population density will place unsustainable pressure on local infrastructure that is already operating at capacity.
Inadequate Community Consultation
The 14-day notification period provided for community response is wholly inadequate for a development of this scale and impact. This abbreviated timeframe:

Prevents thorough community engagement and meaningful consultation
Limits residents' ability to fully understand and respond to complex planning documents
Undermines the principles of transparent and inclusive planning processes
Appears designed to minimise rather than encourage community input

Proper consultation requires sufficient time for residents to review documentation, seek independent advice, and prepare considered submissions. The current process falls well short of this standard.
Inconsistency with Local Character and Planning Principles
Narrabeen is valued for its coastal character, natural environment, and community-focused development. This proposal contradicts these defining features through:

Excessive height and density relative to surrounding development
Insufficient integration with the natural landscape
Loss of significant vegetation without adequate justification
Visual bulk that dominates rather than complements the neighbourhood

Recommendation
For the reasons outlined above, I strongly oppose this development application and request that it be refused. Should the planning authority consider any development on this site, it must:

Preserve all mature native trees along Lagoon Street
Reduce building height and density to align with neighbourhood character
Provide adequate setbacks from all boundaries
Conduct comprehensive traffic and parking studies with meaningful mitigation measures
Undertake genuine community consultation with appropriate timeframes

I request that this submission be considered in full during the assessment process

I’m writing to strongly oppose the proposed six-storey, 149-apartment complex on Lagoon Street, Narrabeen. This kind of project is totally out of character for our area and would cause long-term harm to the local environment, streetscape, and community.

1. Loss of Mature Trees and Habitat

The plan to remove all the mature pines and gum trees along Lagoon Street is devastating. Those trees give the area shade, greenery, and character, and they’re home to sea eagles, tawny frogmouths, kookaburras, cockatoos, and so many other local birds. Losing them would strip away part of what makes Narrabeen feel alive and connected to nature. Not to mention cause harm to our already vulnerable native wildlife species.

2. Out of Scale with Narrabeen’s Character

Narrabeen has always had a low-rise, coastal feel. That’s what makes it special. A six-storey complex with nearly 150 apartments doesn’t fit with that at all. It would completely change the look and feel of the area, overshadow nearby homes, and block the ocean views that so many residents love.

3. Environmental Concerns

Narrabeen sits on a delicate sandy peninsula with a shallow water table. Heavy excavation and dense construction could cause serious problems with drainage, erosion, and local ecology. Once that balance is disrupted, it’s not something we can easily get back.

4. Aboriginal Heritage Risks

This site is close to where Narrabeen Man was discovered: an incredibly significant archaeological and cultural site. There’s a real risk that further excavation could disturb unrecorded Aboriginal remains or artefacts. This proposal fails to show the due respect and caution for the area or the Aboriginal cultural significance tied to it.

5. Visual Impact

The height and bulk of this development will dominate the local landscape and completely block long-standing views across the ocean and escarpment. It will stick out like a sore thumb in what has always been a low-rise, open coastal setting.

6. Lack of Setbacks and Overcrowding

The buildings are planned right up to the edges of Lagoon, Loftus, and Octavia Street, leaving no breathing space or greenery around them. It’s an overbuild that doesn’t reflect how the rest of Narrabeen is designed.

7. Traffic and Parking Issues

The proposal adds around 300 cars exiting onto Lagoon Street but only includes seven visitor spaces. That’s nowhere near enough. Traffic here is already busy and sometimes unsafe. This would just make it worse for everyone, including pedestrians and cyclists.

8. No Public Benefit

This is a private retirement complex, not affordable housing or a community project. There are no improvements to local infrastructure, no open space for the public, and no clear benefit to Narrabeen residents, just more congestion and less greenery. Despite offering no public value, it’s being fast-tracked as a State Significant Development that primarily serves the developer’s interests rather than the community’s.

9. Poor Consultation

Residents were told the project would bypass council and that we only had 14 days to object. The consultation sessions focused on apartment finishes and sales rather than genuine community concerns, which was dismissive and misleading.

In Summary,
This development does not belong in Narrabeen. It’s too tall, too dense, and too destructive to our environment, our streetscape, and our sense of community.
Please reject this proposal and protect what makes Narrabeen special: its beauty, nature, open space, native wildlife and pristine coastal character.