Security fencing across 270 hectares creates barriers to stock and wildlife movement. How will emergency egress function during a fast-moving grassfire?

Imported panels may embed significant carbon from overseas manufacturing. Lifecycle emissions are rarely transparent. Has a full cradle-to-grave audit been published?

Farmers in Victoria have objected to prime land being treated as vacant space for metropolitan energy demand. Regional equity demands restraint. Why must this shire bear disproportionate infrastructure?

Transmission infrastructure can fragment wildlife corridors and shelter belts vital for stock. How will habitat disruption be measured and mitigated over decades?

The misleading 166 MW headline figure disguises a pathetic average capacity factor below 20%, meaning this 270 ha industrial complex will frequently only deliver a fraction of its claimed output — and obviously zero at night — while still requiring full grid infrastructure and imposing outrageous cost blowouts on us mistreated electricity consumers - for unnecessary, CCP controlling transmission line interconnectors - that we absolutely 💯 object to.

Panel glare may affect machinery operators and rural aviation. Agricultural pilots require clear sightlines. Has glare modelling considered low-angle winter sun during sowing periods?

Overseas industrial installations frequently rely on transient labour. Short-term economic boosts rarely offset long-term land loss. What lasting employment will remain once construction ends?

Rural fire services are volunteer-based and already stretched. Specialist battery firefighting training is costly. Who funds ongoing capability development locally?

Decommissioning after 25–30 years may coincide with further technological obsolescence. Financial securities sometimes prove inadequate. What indexed bond guarantees full site restoration regardless of market conditions?

Once grid connections are established, expansion becomes easier. Communities are often assured there will be no scaling up. Can the proponent legally rule out future enlargement?