Key concerns include:
Overshadowing: Potential loss of solar access for units and common areas.
Privacy: Increased overlooking from the proposed high-rise structure.
Traffic and Noise: Increased congestion and noise during and after construction. The proposed driveway access via Peach Lane is of particular concern, as it is narrow, has no footpath, and may pose safety risks for pedestrians. The proposed car park capacity of 189 vehicles (excluding motorcycles and bicycles) is also significantly high for the lane’s current capacity.
Visual Amenity: The scale of the project in relation to the existing building.

Dear NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure,
I am writing to formally object to the proposed rezoning of 33–43 Marion Street, Parramatta. As a concerned local resident, I believe this proposal fails to adequately consider the impact on sunlight access, residential amenity, infrastructure, safety, and heritage. I respectfully request that the Department reconsider the proposal or require amendments to address these significant issues.
1. Overshadowing and Loss of Sunlight Access
The proposed rezoning would facilitate a large increase in building height and density on the site. This would result in substantial overshadowing of neighbouring properties, particularly during winter months. Under Clause 4.3 of the Parramatta LEP 2011, the protection of sunlight access is critical to ensuring that development does not unduly reduce residential amenity.
According to Parramatta DCP 2011, Part 3 - General Controls, solar access (referred to in DCP as "sunlight") to primary living spaces and private open spaces is essential, particularly during the key hours of 9am to 3pm in winter. The proposed development risks failing to meet these guidelines, which would result in diminished sunlight access for existing properties, affecting the quality of life for current residents.
2. Impact on Mental Health and Wellbeing
Natural sunlight plays a key role in supporting physical and mental health. Research has shown that a lack of sunlight can lead to conditions such as Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD), general depression, and other mood disorders. As referenced in Parramatta DCP 2011, Part 3 - General Controls, maintaining sunlight access is crucial not just for physical comfort, but for community wellbeing. The proposed development, which would block sunlight from key areas of surrounding residential properties, could exacerbate mental health concerns, particularly in an already dense urban environment.
3. Increased Living Costs
The loss of natural light would result in increased reliance on artificial lighting and heating, leading to higher energy costs for residents. Given the current economic climate and the ongoing increase in cost-of-living pressures, the potential for higher utility bills is a significant concern. The Parramatta DCP 2011, Part 3 - General Controls, highlights the importance of energy-efficient design to reduce household expenditure, yet this proposal disregards these principles by blocking natural light, thereby forcing existing residents to increase their reliance on artificial sources of energy.
4. Traffic Congestion and Infrastructure Strain
The rezoning proposal, which allows for nearly 300 additional apartment units on the site, raises concerns about the capacity of existing infrastructure. According to Clause 7.2 of the Parramatta LEP 2011 (Traffic, Transport, and Parking), new developments should ensure that local roads, pedestrian paths, and public transport systems can accommodate increased demand.
The addition of 300 new units will generate a significant increase in vehicle traffic, exacerbating congestion and pressure on an already strained infrastructure network. Without sufficient upgrades to roads and transport systems, this development will likely compromise the safety and convenience of both current and future residents.
5. Safety Concerns Due to Narrow Access Lanes
The development's design raises concerns about the adequacy of access for emergency services and daily traffic. Parramatta DCP 2011, Part 4 - Site Planning and Design, emphasizes that adequate vehicular access and circulation, especially for emergency vehicles, is critical to ensuring safety in new developments. The proposed development's reliance on narrow access lanes presents a clear risk to safety, as these lanes may not be suitable for accommodating increased traffic volumes or emergency vehicles, which could delay response times and increase safety risks for residents.
6. Impact on Heritage and Local Character
Parramatta is home to a rich cultural and architectural heritage. According to Clause 5.10 of the Parramatta LEP 2011, the preservation of heritage items and conservation areas is a primary consideration in any development application. The proposed rezoning risks undermining the heritage value of surrounding areas, particularly in terms of visual amenity and the preservation of Parramatta’s distinctive architectural character.
There is a need to balance development with the protection of the local heritage fabric to maintain the identity and sense of place that residents and visitors value.
________________________________________
Conclusion
In light of the significant overshadowing, the loss of sunlight, the mental and physical health impacts, the strain on local infrastructure, and the risk to heritage, I strongly urge the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure to reconsider the proposed rezoning of 33–43 Marion Street, Parramatta.
I respectfully ask that the Department require amendments to the proposal to:
• Address the overshadowing and sunlight access issues as per the Parramatta LEP and DCP guidelines.
• Include adequate infrastructure upgrades to support increased traffic and ensure safety.
• Preserve the heritage values of the surrounding area.
Thank you for considering my submission. I trust that these concerns will be given full consideration as part of the assessment process.
Yours sincerely,
Krutartha and Ishita Patel
Owners of Unit 15. 27 Station Street West, Harris Park, NSW 2762

As per correspondence dated 31/10/2025 by NSW EPA (see attached)

Please refer to the attached documents.