I object as I am not satisfied that the modifications to this project sufficiently and conclusively address all the issues raised in the original and the modified proposal for the reasons outlined in my submission.

The owners of 12 Stanhope Road object to the development proposed under the SSDA as amended for the reasons provided in the attached letter of objection.

I object to the proposed development.
I re-attach my previous submission dated 22 May 25 and repeat all comments made as though current, as I consider the Proponent’s Response does not alter the material facts and my previous opinions. I also attached a further response to the latest submissions.
1. I object to the proposed development because it is over-scale for the limited
site and too high at 10 storeys at the northern boundary with 10 Marian Street;
2. I believe the Clause 4.6 Variation request should be rejected because it is
based on inaccurate and misleading information and not in the public interest;
3. I believe the development will ruin the local environment and diminish the
amenity of the area for its neighbours;
4. I believe Stanhope Road is already unsafe, particularly with its junctions with
the Pacific Highway and Culworth Avenue and especially during construction
when it would become very dangerous;
5. I believe that during and post construction, Stanhope Road would be so
parked out that its amenity would be destroyed;
6. I believe that it is unfeasible for the removal to tip of the predicted 20,000 +
tonnes of excavated and demolition material via Werona Avenue as it does
not lead to a local traffic-light intersection with the Pacific Highway, and that
despite any attempts to deny access to Culworth Avenue, the direct route to
the Lorne Avenue traffic-lights, those efforts would be unsuccessful and cause
undue danger; and
7. The stormwater discharge should not/cannot be via 10 Marian Steet as it
would feed directly into the Council’s declared Overland Flow or Mainstream
Flow Flood Planning Area and may cause flooding of its buildings – see later
detailed comments.

Please see attached submission

I made a submission previously and none of the responses to submissions and amendments satisfy my concerns about the impact of the development on the neighbourhood. These include the height of the building, the impact on traffic in the area and the impact of a major storm event on the property at the rear of the building which is already in a flood planning area.