I am a long term resident of the Blue Mountains, and a keen bushwalker. The area planned for this development seems inappropriate to me, as it overrides the existing careful protection that is applied to all Mountains developments. The Blue Mountains heritage-listed area is important to locals and visitors alike for natural beauty, unspoiled views, and tranquil bushland. This proposed development would compromise these values, blocking views over Narrow Neck Plateau and Megalong Valley, increasing stormwater run-off, disrupting the ecosystems of local creeks and ultimately waterfalls in the area. Add to this the noise pollution that would be caused by extra road traffic and the quiet residential component nearby would be changed considerably.
The history of bushfires in this area should also be considered. While there might not have been bushfires on the land itself, the whole Narrow Neck/ Peckman's Plateau area has often been threatened, most recently in the 2019/2020 fires.
This development might provide some level of extra housing in the Blue Mountains, but it would be in the wrong place entirely. The idea of re-zoning the area to allow development strikes me as shocking and would, I feel, set a precedent for unlimited development throughout the Blue Mountains.
Therefore, I oppose this development and any other proposed HDA development here, and hope that it will not be approved.

This project is an absolute abomination. It is a huge bushfire risk, multi storey buildings in a high bush fire risk area with only one road in and out. Meaning the RFS and residents will all be put in danager next time we have a fire (and we have them regularly). It will also cause hugh environmental damage increasing stormwater runoff from hard surfaces in a vunerable area as well as the aging sewerage and water infrastructure . there will be major, negative economic consequences as the Blue Mountains is a major tourist destination and visitors do not want to see major medium rise buildings blocking or detracting from their viewing of our beautiful area. Many of the dwellings will undoubtably be used for Air B&B accommodation which, whilst bringing tourists to the area, is causing a lot of problems for local businesses as Air B&B guests do not eat out or support local businesses so do not generate income for the local community.

The manner in which this project has been approved is insulting to the Blue Mountains community. LEP and local planning rules have been created to support and protect our Heritage Listed environment and the HDA process has overridden this and fast tracked the wishes of big business and profit over the wishes of the people who currently live, work and enjoy this community and beautiful environment. This development sets an alarming precident for any developer looking to make a quick buck and will forever ruin our beautiful low density streetscape and greater World Heritage Listed environment.

I am totally opposed to the Narrow Road development. The development is totally out of character for the area and the Blue Mountains more broadly. The World Heritage values of the Blue Mountains are at risk with such an inappropriate development. The World Heritage values of the Blue Mountains are significantly influenced by the development that occurs and has occurred within the townships of the Blue Mountains. The aesthetic values for example may be significantly impacted by developments that protrude or intrude into the character of the natural environment and existing built environment. Large high rise multi-storey developments are an example of inappropriate development impacting upon the aesthetic values, fabric and setting of the World Heritage Area and Blue Mountains Township. Once a proposal of this nature is approved there will be no restraint on future developments of this nature which will significantly degrade the character of the Blue Mountains townships and the World Heritage Area values impacting upon their fabric and setting. Conservation of the Blue Mountains World Heritage Area and the townships is based upon the respect for the existing fabric, use, associations and meanings. The proposed development does not respect the existing fabric, associations and meanings. People come to the Blue Mountains to live and to visit because it is meaningful as a setting within nature, away from the metropolis and dense urban areas. It has strong associations with arts communities, spiritual communities and outdoors enthusiasts because of these meanings and associations. These meanings and associations have been maintained since the earliest history of the Blue Mountains when people would come to the mountains to experience the natural world and to be inspired. I am hoping that the process for assessing State Significant Development will take this into account and not just be an excuse to bypass the local government and local community concerns in favour of development at any cost. The proposed development will be seen on the horizon from as far away as Kanangra Walls and parts of the Wild dog Mountains, wild and rugged wilderness areas that will be punctuated by buildings breaking the skyline. The proposed development is so wrong, on so many levels, both the local impacts and impacts and issues from the adjoing World Heritage Area.

I am Appalled that this could even be considered in our World Heritage Area. Also, I am very disappointed that the state government has by-passed the Blue Mountains council, with their expert knowledge of the area to try to push this project through. All of us know in our hearts how important it is to protect our environment from big business and developers. This development is a disgrace, and if it goes ahead, will open the flood gates to other developers, changing our Blue Mountains forever. There are other places to put high density housing, but the Blue Mountains is not one of them, due to the extra impact of the surrounding area.
1. There is not the infrastructure to deal with the increased population
2.Fire Risk
3. Not fit for Purpose
4. Narrow Neck is called this for a reason. It cannot take the extra pressure that high density housing will bring, especially in an evacuation in case of fire.
5. Not up to council approval
6. Storm water will impede on Sydney water catchment area
8. Buildings are too close together and sunlight will be reduced
9. 143 trees are to be removed
10. These are just some of the points made. Council has a more researched account of what is affordable housing for this area, and you should listen to them

This project will significantly impact Katoomba, entirely negatively.
Besides being a reported and documented bushfire risk, something that is a huge threat to all current residents. It will also cause a horrific eyesore and stand out for almost all view points in Katoomba. It does not have any co-hesive build or stature in a town known for its heritage and history and respect for the world heritage national park to which it belongs.
There has been no consultation with the community, and for something that is absolutely going to havean impact, we were given and extremely short amount of time to get our replies in. It is also predominantly not affordable housing, which causes a huge problem in the local area.
I also want to point out again, how important the surrounds are, and the fact it is an environmentally sensitive area located prone to bushfires. The beauty and tranquillity is one of the reasons why we chose to live here, and not to become a suburb of greater western sydney.

I object to the project for the following reasons:

- 142-150 Narrowneck Rd is located in an environmentally sensitive area at the top of the Katoomba Creek Falls catchment. Any major development of this site has the potential for significant environmental impacts on the downstream environment.
- The site is in an extremely bushfire-prone area, with limited evacuation routes. Adding 200+ dwellings to this area would make the safe evacuation of residents in a fire difficult.
- The development proposal is grossly out-of-scale with the existing neighbourhood, which is valued for it's natural bush setting. The proposed buildings will be highly-visible from all vantage points within Katoomba, detracting from our special Blue Mountains scenery.
- There are limited public transport options in this part of Katoomba, so residents of this development would have to rely on car transport to Katoomba's town centre. This will add too much traffic to the local roads.

Katoomba is a special place for locals who choose to live here for the beautiful, unspoilt natural environment. It is also a special place for national and international tourists to visit - they come here to experience Blue Mountains National Park and the charming villages and towns located in it. The scale of the development proposed for 142-150 Narrowneck Rd is inappropriate for this area and will detract from our lovely mountains home.

To whom it may concern,
I am writing to object to the proposed development at 142–150 Narrow Neck Road, Katoomba. Although I do not live permanently at this address, I visit the area frequently to support my daughter and her young family who live nearby and to care for their home and pets while they are away. Through these regular visits I am very familiar with the nature of this neighbourhood and its constraints, and I am extremely concerned by the scale and location of the development being proposed.

It is particularly troubling that nearby residents were not properly notified during the earlier consultation stage in 2025. Meaningful community consultation should occur before projects of this magnitude reach the exhibition phase, especially where local families are directly affected. From my experience spending time in this area, Narrow Neck Road already feels limited in its capacity, particularly given its role as an access route in a bushfire-prone landscape. Increasing residential density at this location raises serious concerns about evacuation safety and emergency access. This is not an appropriate place for a large multi-building residential complex. I also understand that my daughter’s family built their home in this environmental living area only four years ago and were required to follow strict planning controls relating to building placement, height, materials and bushfire protection. It is difficult to understand how a development of over 200 dwellings in buildings up to five storeys high could now be considered suitable in the same sensitive setting.

The proposal appears out of character with the surrounding landscape and inconsistent with the low-density residential nature of this part of Katoomba. The proximity to the escarpment and the wider Blue Mountains landscape makes this location particularly unsuitable for development of this intensity.

For these reasons, including concerns about bushfire safety, infrastructure limitations, landscape impact, and the lack of adequate early notification to nearby residents, I respectfully request that this application NOT be approved.
Yours sincerely,
Irina Gladushchenko

Bushfire risk for the proposed development in this location. The inevitable future bushfire in the valley and on the cliffs adjoining this development will inevitably result in confusion, congestion and chaos on the narrow and winding roads serving the area as panicky people attempt to flee to the Great Western Highway.
1. This development will create the likelihood of a repeat Black Summer event resulting in a Kinglake-type mass-casualty catastrophe, for which the Government would be entirely responsible.
2. With the increasing fire risk in the Blue Mountains, it is probable that insurance will be denied in the not-too-distant future.
3. Additionally, the traffic congestion as people attempt to flee would inevitably mean access for essential emergency services would be very seriously compromised, resulting in even higher casualties and property damage.
Unacceptable impact and future threat. This enormous development proposal presents a grotesque and unacceptable intrusion into the Blue Mountains landscape, streetscapes and cultural and heritage values. If approved, there would then be no way of limiting the future approval of similar monstrosities, leading to the Blue Mountains everyone values becoming little more than an ugly suburb of Metropolitan Sydney.
Housing needs. The idea that this development might contribute much-needed housing to the area is a cruel fantasy. Katoomba is one of the poorest postcodes in the state and one of the greatest needs here is for more public and low-cost housing for those in the greatest need. This development will not contribute in any meaningful way to addressing this pressing issue but will, if anything, aggravate the already concerning inequality in our community.

Please see Word Document Attached

This is a foolish, irresponsible and dangerous proposal. Firstly, the Blue Mountains does not have the infrastructure to support such a development, this is a major fire zone, with only 1 road in and out. Building the proposed apartment block would place lives at risk, not only those of the residents, but that of our fire brigade too when they inevitable have to intervene.
Secondly, this is an ecologically sensitive area, in a World Heritage National Park. The mere act of constructing these apartments would threaten this environment, not to mention the increased traffic from residents accessing the space should it be built.
Thirdly, this housing is neither fiscally or physically accessible, and would therefore not be serving the needs of the current Blue Mountains community. We need fire-safe, affordable and accessible housing, not more fire-prone apartment blocks.