am writing to formally object to the proposed 37-storey mixed-use development at 215, 229–239 Pitt Street, Merrylands.

This proposal is completely out of touch with the reality of our already overcrowded suburb. Merrylands is struggling with congestion, overdevelopment, and strained infrastructure as it is. Adding a 37-level high-rise in the middle of this area is excessive, unnecessary, and frankly irresponsible.

Residents in this community did not sign up to live in the shadow of yet another towering building. Many people have invested significant money into their homes and apartments specifically for their views—views that this development will now destroy. This includes clear outlooks toward Sydney CBD and across Merrylands itself. Those views are not a luxury; they are part of what people paid for and should not be taken away for a project that offers little real benefit to the existing community.

The scale of this development is completely disproportionate to the surrounding area. It will:
• Block natural light and views from multiple angles
• Increase traffic and pressure on already inadequate infrastructure
• Further overcrowd an area that is already overpopulated
• Diminish the quality of life for current residents

There is no justification for a building of this height and density in this location. It does not reflect the needs or wishes of the people who actually live here.

This project feels like overdevelopment for the sake of profit, with no genuine consideration for the community impact. Residents are being ignored, and our concerns are being sidelined.

I strongly urge the Department to reject this proposal in its current form. Merrylands does not need another oversized, intrusive development that compromises the livability of the area. BUILD IT IN PARRAMATTA CBD IF YOU GUYS WANT A POINTLESS LUXURY SKY HIGH BUILDING, WE DONT WANT THIS

This is not acceptable, and the community deserves better.

I am writing this to show my objections towards this project. I am a first home owner and since living in Merrylands, in my own home, I have seen a lot of crimes happening within the area to the point where it is getting scarier to get out from the house. My parcel has been stolen once from our locked apartment lobby, a lot of suspicious non-residents are gathering infront of our buildings every now and then, people trying to break in, almost everyday we can see people fighting on the street and occasional stabbing and robbery in the bright day light, and many more!!!!

This housing will only bring more problems for the current Merrylands resident, as if the crimes here are not enough already. I know many of my neighbours are objecting this project too. We just want to live peacefully in our own area and I think we would like housing like this to be reduced, not added.

Please help us in focusing on reducing the crimes in Merrylands instead of bringing more issues for the current residents as it wont look good on you guys and it will cause us the existing residents to suffer even more.

Thank you.

I am writing to formally object to the proposed development at 215, 229-239 Pitt Street (SSD-79844224) due to the following reasons:
1. Inappropriate Building Height: The proposed height of 34 storeys is an extreme departure from the local area's character. I strongly believe that the height should be limited to a maximum of 6 storeys to ensure it remains consistent with the surrounding low-to-medium density residential environment and to prevent severe overshadowing.
2. Impact on Property Values: Such an unprecedented high-density development risks devaluing established properties nearby and altering the residential appeal that current homeowners invested in.
3. Infrastructure and Traffic Congestion: Adding hundreds of units will overwhelm Pitt Street and Merrylands Road. A 34-storey building will cause unsustainable traffic and parking issues for the local community.
I urge the Department to reject the current proposal and mandate a significant reduction in height to no more than 6 storeys to protect the quality of life and interests of existing residents.

I am a new tenant in a neighbouring mixed-use residential development. It is a fantastic neighbourhood with easy access to public transport and a large shopping centre. While the development I am currently staying in is considered premium, I can see how the area could benefit from more affordable housing.

I support the project

I object to the project

I support the project, I believe it will significantly increase housing availability and affordability in the area.

I would however, like to see the number of storeys significantly increased.

I object to the proposed 37‑storey mixed‑use development for the following reasons:

Scale & character: Height and bulk are incompatible with the surrounding low‑rise neighbourhood and will dominate the streetscape.

Overshadowing & daylight loss: Significant loss of sunlight to nearby homes, private open space and public areas at key times of year. In my unit I get only 2 hours of sunlight during early morning!

Privacy & amenity: Upper‑level apartments will directly overlook neighbouring properties, reducing privacy and residential amenity (noise, light spill).

Traffic, parking & infrastructure: The proposal will intensify traffic, worsen on‑street parking and overload local services (public transport, sewer, schools) without demonstrated upgrades. Finding parking on street is already impossible. No proper park for kids to play within a walking distance. We need more parks less traffic and safer environment for kids and families.
More childcares as this area reached the limits in ratios of new families and childcares. My toddler on a 6 months waiting time to secure a spot in childcare with open space not in apartments building.

Wind & public realm: Height and form will create wind tunnelling and poor pedestrian conditions at street level.
Insufficient impact assessment & mitigation: Exhibition materials lack adequate traffic, overshadowing, wind, acoustic and stormwater studies and enforceable mitigation measures. literally there is no proper study for Wind, shadows and traffic done by professionals.
Remedy sought: refuse in current form or require substantial reduction in height/massing, detailed independent technical studies, enforceable mitigation (parking/traffic management, infrastructure upgrades, privacy/sunlight protection), and meaningful community consultation.



Kind Regards,

Rimi Kadri

I object to the proposed 37‑storey mixed‑use development for the following reasons:

Scale & character: Height and bulk are incompatible with the surrounding low‑rise neighbourhood and will dominate the streetscape.

Overshadowing & daylight loss: Significant loss of sunlight to nearby homes, private open space and public areas at key times of year. In my unit I get only 2 hours of sunlight during early morning!

Privacy & amenity: Upper‑level apartments will directly overlook neighbouring properties, reducing privacy and residential amenity (noise, light spill).

Traffic, parking & infrastructure: The proposal will intensify traffic, worsen on‑street parking and overload local services (public transport, sewer, schools) without demonstrated upgrades. Finding parking on street is already impossible. No proper park for kids to play within a walking distance. We need more parks less traffic and safer environment for kids and families.
More childcares as this area reached the limits in ratios of new families and childcares. My toddler on a 6 months waiting time to secure a spot in childcare with open space not in apartments building.

Wind & public realm: Height and form will create wind tunnelling and poor pedestrian conditions at street level.
Insufficient impact assessment & mitigation: Exhibition materials lack adequate traffic, overshadowing, wind, acoustic and stormwater studies and enforceable mitigation measures. literally there is no proper study for Wind, shadows and traffic done by professionals.
Remedy sought: refuse in current form or require substantial reduction in height/massing, detailed independent technical studies, enforceable mitigation (parking/traffic management, infrastructure upgrades, privacy/sunlight protection), and meaningful community consultation.



Kind Regards,

Anas Albasyuni

I object to the proposed development on the grounds of its significant negative impact on
surrounding residents, public amenity, and the local environment.
The development will result in a substantial loss of views toward Sydney Harbour, which contribute
to the amenity and value of surrounding properties. In addition, the building’s height and bulk will
cause excessive overshadowing, leading to a loss of natural sunlight to nearby residential buildings,
shared amenities, and the Merrylands town square. This reduction in sunlight will diminish comfort,
usability, and overall wellbeing, with potential negative effects on residents’ mental health, including
my own.
The proposal will also lead to increased privacy impacts, with upper levels likely to overlook
neighbouring apartments, balconies, and communal spaces. This will reduce the level of privacy
currently enjoyed by residents and negatively affect day-to-day living conditions.
There will be significant noise impacts associated with both the construction phase and the
completed development. Prolonged construction activity will create ongoing disruption, while
increased population density will generate additional noise from traffic, residents, and servicing
activity.
The scale of the building may also create adverse wind and microclimate effects at street level,
including wind tunnelling around buildings and public spaces. This could reduce comfort and
usability of outdoor areas, including the Merrylands town square.
The development will place additional strain on existing local infrastructure, including roads,
intersections, public transport, drainage systems, and essential services such as schools and
healthcare. The area is already experiencing growth, and this proposal will further intensify
pressure on these systems.
Traffic congestion and parking availability are also major concerns. The proposal is likely to
increase vehicle movements, worsen congestion, and place further strain on already limited street
parking. This will negatively impact accessibility and increase travel times, particularly toward
Parramatta and the city.
The proposed development appears inconsistent with the existing character and scale of the
surrounding area. A building of this height and bulk is not in keeping with the established
streetscape and may result in an overdevelopment of the site.
Construction impacts must also be considered, including dust, debris, vibration, and potential
structural impacts on nearby buildings. These issues will affect residents’ quality of life for an
extended period.
The development is also expected to negatively impact the value of surrounding properties,
including my own. Loss of views, reduced natural light, increased congestion, and decreased
overall amenity are all factors that can diminish the desirability and market value of nearby
apartments and buildings.
Importantly, the proposal does not appear to provide adequate communal or recreational space for
residents, unlike many recent developments. This lack of contribution to leisure and open space
places additional pressure on existing public areas and fails to meet evolving expectations for
liveability in higher-density developments.
While I would not object to a development of up to 26 storeys if it were appropriately positioned
along Merrylands Road, the proposed location is unsuitable for such scale. In this specific location,
the development should be limited to a maximum of six storeys to better align with community
expectations, protect local amenity, and reduce adverse impacts.
For these reasons, I strongly oppose the proposal in its current form.