Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
SPRING TERRACE
,
New South Wales
Message
I object to the mod 16 on many grounds
Robin Gunning
Object
Robin Gunning
Object
North Tamworth
,
New South Wales
Message
I object to the project because Newmont Cadia have made no attempt to effectively to consult the local community about hydro sands. There has been no proper scrutiny of these changes.
Roy Cottage
Object
Roy Cottage
Object
North Tamworth
,
New South Wales
Message
Mod 16 has not been sufficiently scrutinised.
Noise and dust affecting sleep and health.
Noise and dust affecting sleep and health.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Millthorpe
,
New South Wales
Message
No meaningful consultation with the community
There has been no meaningful community consultation on MOD-16. Newmont has reduced the level of community consultation to ‘drop in’ sessions only. There have not been any presentations with a question-and-answer session from Newmont for MOD-16.
Newmont is placing the burden of the MOD-16 so the onus is on Newmont to effectively consult and update the community, not the other way around.
Lack of proper scrutiny of new technology
MOD-16 is a back door approval for a new technology, hydro cyclone sands, which will result in a significant change in the impacts of CVO on the local community. There has been no proper scrutiny of these changes.
Noise
MOD-16 states that ‘mobile equipment associated with the TSF rock buttressing works which were previously restricted to the day and evening periods, is being introduced at night as a part of MOD- 16. This ‘mobile equipment’ includes very large, very noisy heavy machinery, such as very big tractors and excavators, which will be run for 24 hours a day, seven days a week. This is not acceptable. It is bad enough that residents that live nearby get noise during the day, now you want to inflict noise on them at night as well?
There has been no meaningful community consultation on MOD-16. Newmont has reduced the level of community consultation to ‘drop in’ sessions only. There have not been any presentations with a question-and-answer session from Newmont for MOD-16.
Newmont is placing the burden of the MOD-16 so the onus is on Newmont to effectively consult and update the community, not the other way around.
Lack of proper scrutiny of new technology
MOD-16 is a back door approval for a new technology, hydro cyclone sands, which will result in a significant change in the impacts of CVO on the local community. There has been no proper scrutiny of these changes.
Noise
MOD-16 states that ‘mobile equipment associated with the TSF rock buttressing works which were previously restricted to the day and evening periods, is being introduced at night as a part of MOD- 16. This ‘mobile equipment’ includes very large, very noisy heavy machinery, such as very big tractors and excavators, which will be run for 24 hours a day, seven days a week. This is not acceptable. It is bad enough that residents that live nearby get noise during the day, now you want to inflict noise on them at night as well?
John Gerathy
Object
John Gerathy
Object
ERROWANBANG
,
New South Wales
Message
We object to Mod 16.
the proposal should be delt with as a part of CVO's proposed CCOP 21 EIS application
the proposal should be delt with as a part of CVO's proposed CCOP 21 EIS application
Attachments
CABONNE COUNCIL
Comment
CABONNE COUNCIL
Comment
Daniel Mendes
Support
Daniel Mendes
Support
Chatswood
,
New South Wales
Message
I support the project