I believe that more research as to the long term impact of a new industry such as kelp farming must be undertaken - specifically to the environmental impact it would have on such a narrow waterway (Wonboyn Lake Entrance) as it impacts a huge industry of Oyster farmers, fishing and tourism. At the very least a visit from government officials to inspect the site and listen to the opinion of the local community,

I don't want anything to negatively impact on the marine life. Leave the animals and environment alone.

Please see attached LoS

I would like to submit my rejection to stop 'Eden 1' an industrialised size monoculture kelp farm proposed for Disaster Bay, Southern Sapphire Coast, NSW.

Experts have read every word of the AusKelp Eden 1 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Scientists, Marine Economists and Community Leaders have written their responses. Collated together these objection submissions should have presented enough evidence to effectively to stop any projects like this in its tracks where the health and well being of DISASTER BAY and its inhabitants are at the CENTRE of the debate.
This special place is so important. Anything like this should not be put in the ocean to upset the fragile balance of nature. Especially anywhere near whale migratory paths.

My legacy for my children and grandchildren will be that I left no stone unturned in my bid to protect Disaster Bay which provides so many with immeasurable joy and solace.

Government officials simply can not make decisions about sacred places like this without first travelling to experience Disaster Bay for themselves. Surely, at the very least, Disaster Bay, the LAST Coastal Wilderness in NSW, deserves that.
I implore you to NOT APPROVE this project.
Kristy

I am against this commercial adventure in one of Australia's pristine and unique areas on the South Coast of NSW and Australia.
We have owned a family home in Wonboyn for 20+ years and the reason we bought here was the amazing wilderness and unspoit beauty to experience and show our kids. We have also opened our home to holiday seekers to experience the same beauty and nature sanctuaries that we have experienced to all their amazement.
This is an area I feel strongly we must keep in its original state for everyone to appreciate with it's pristine and deserted beaches aswell as beautiful National park and wildlife refuge.
The last thing we need if for a local property owner in Wonboyn benefiting and destroying this Sanctuary for his own gain.
There's plenty places to set up elsewhere on the coast that already have resources in place that he could use and benefit from.

I strongly object to the proposed kelp farm at Disaster Bay, Eden NSW.
The proposed farm will be a disaster for Disaster Bay. I am primarily worried about the environmental impact the proposed kelp farm will have on the delicate ecosystem on a part of our coastline which, frankly, should already be protected. It should not be necessary to even write this objection.
It is difficult to understand how a commercial venture should have precedence over protection of these irreplaceable ecosystems that currently exist. This part of the world belongs to all Australians to enjoy. Not a commercial kelp farm.
Please rethink. The damage that is proposed is likely irreversible.
Thank you.

My Submission is regarding the many questions the proposed Kelp Farm project raises for me on a Personal a Local level.
I am a frequent visitor/user of this area regarding Boating, Camping, Bush Walking and live locally in the Eden area.
Having Hiked through the Nadgee Nature reserve to Merrica River on a number of occasions I struggle to understand how the Visual impact of 24,000 Buoy's floating in the bay and the introduction of over 1,000 klm's of Nylon rope fits in with any guidelines in place to preserve the environment and maintain the visual appeal of the area. The introduction of a huge quantity of plastic product like this into this pristine marine environment in this day and age is hard to believe its even being considered .
So my questions are;
How does this impact the Commercial, local fisherman/boaters and divers of the area.
What impact is this going to have on the local and migrating marine life.
Who is going to monitor and clean up the debris after the huge sea's that are experienced in this area damage the Lease, I can't believe this will not be the consequence here.
How will they monitor and contain the Micro Plastics released from the 1,000 klm plus of Nylon rope as it Breaks down and degrades into the Bay.
Is this going to be an introduction of Kelp and Weed that is not endemic to the local area that will result in the local species being slowly taken over by a foreign species that is to the detriment of the local marine life.
These are just some of the questions that come to my mind when considering this project.
I believe the "Jewel in the Crown" of this area, the whole of the Sapphire Coast for that matter, is the Pristine Waters and Visual Splendour of the area, enough is enough of continually putting this at risk for the financial gain of a small number of people.
Common Sense prevails at times, while I am not in any way Scientifically Qualified to make comment on this Project I personally call on that Common Sense approach to question the Merit of this Project in the Interest of the Local and Visiting people of the area the Marine Environment, the local Flora and Fauna and the Preservation of the Spectacular Sapphire Coast.

One of my main concerns is the potential impact on wildlife. This stretch of coast supports whales, dolphins, seabirds, and other marine life that move through or rely on this area. Introducing a large network of ropes, lines, and surface structures creates new risks, including entanglement and disturbance.
Even if the likelihood of incidents is considered low, the consequences can be serious, especially in a place that currently has very little human interference. There is also the ongoing presence of vessels, noise, and activity, which will inevitably affect how wildlife uses the area.
This coastline stands out because it is still relatively free from these pressures. Adding them now feels like an unnecessary risk in a place that has so far remained largely undisturbed.
For these reasons, I object to the proposal.

I support the proposed AusKelp project in Disaster Bay because it represents a positive step towards building a more resilient local community through the introduction of a new, sustainable aquaculture industry. The project has the potential to create meaningful local jobs and diversify the regional economy while working with the natural environment rather than against it. As the kelp species being cultivated is native to the area and locally sourced, the proposal is unlikely to introduce environmental risks and instead offers opportunities to enhance marine ecosystems, improve habitat complexity, and support long-term environmental health.

As someone who enjoys visiting the NSW South Coast I hope this project can help the local community prosper by supporting a resilient, long-term industry that complements the region’s character and reduces reliance on tourism alone.

The proposed seaweed farm with take up a very large area of the bay. I am a keen kayaker and have used the bay on many occasions but only on relatively calm days. This bay is often rough, windy and exposed - hence the name “disaster bay”. The proposed farm will be impacted. Debris from the farming practice will inevitably get washed up on the beach and rocks creating pollution and no doubt destroying the farm. The warmer ocean temperatures are resulting in more destructive storms and quantities of washed up seaweed with smother the coastline.

Local sea creatures will also be impacted. Fairy penguins, dolfiins, sea birds, seals and whales use the area and potentially could get caught in the rope and buoy infrastructure. Pollution and noise from servicing boats will also impact wild life.

This area is special because of its remoteness and tranquility. Having a seaweed farm in the bay will be devastating for these qualities. Pollution in the form of noise, lights, plastic etc will be created.

The proximity to Nadgee Nature Reserve is a huge concern. There is not enough evidence to be sure that the farm will not impact the Nadgee coastline. The purpose of this nature reserve is to preserve the integration between the land and sea. For example, impacts on the fairy penguin feeding areas and the hazard of ropes and netting means that the penguin rookeries on Gabo Island would be disrupted.

I object to this proposal going ahead for all these reasons.