This is a conservation area. Sydney should have a variety of residential densities, with some areas being higher and others lower. Residents in this suburb have paid a premium to enjoy the benefits of low-density living. We do not want this project to ruin the character of our suburb.

Submission attached

Prity Cleary,
Senior Planning Officer, Affordable Housing Assessments
Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure

Dear Prity,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on SSDA 82899468 for a proposed development at 1-5 Nelson Rd., Lindfield.
I believe that this application is incomplete and inaccurate, and may also contravene the planning controls in place at the time of application. I also believe the reason for this is that the application was rushed, as evidenced in communications from the developers planner (attached). As such, it should be assessed and rejected for further refinement. A design that is the result of consideration of heritage, biodiversity, stormwater management and privacy for surrounding residents would be acceptable and I welcome a re-submission that takes these and other issues into account.
These are the main impacts on me, and I have detailed these in the attachment titled, "SSD-82899468 Response from David Walker.pdf".
In addition to this document, nearly all owners of the properties adjoining the proposed development site have contributed to a document which lists all the errors and inadequacies that are relevant to us. As such, this document should also form a part of their submissions, where they have referred to it. This document, attached, is titled, "Errors and Inadequacies.pdf".
Other attachments are referred to within the documents above.
I welcome any contact if anything in this submission needs clarification or further details. Thanks again and I look frward to hearing the determination of this application.
Kind regards,
Dave.