This proposed development is of excessive height and bulk and is completely incongruous with the character and heritage aspects of Mosman. It will dwarf the surrounding residential housing and will be a permanent eyesore.
This area forms part of the scenic landscape leading to Balmoral Beach, an area used and enjoyed by many not only for its natural beauty but for the character of the built environment. A development of this scale and bulk will ruin the amenity for local residents and many others who come to Mosman to make use of local attractions.
Developments should be in line with the nature of the surrounding area, not of a scale more suited to commercial city areas.

ATTN: Edwina Ross
Senior Planning Officer
[email protected]

Development Application SSD-93020230 at 40–48 Muston St, Mosman - OBJECTION

Dear Ms Ross,
I’m writing to object to the proposed development at 40–48 Redan Street. I support
growth that genuinely improves our community, but this proposal creates serious and
avoidable impacts for the people who already live here.
> Safety for local residents:
Redan Lane is already unsafe — no footpath, tight two-way traffic, and heavy use by
families walking to Mosman Public School and Mosman High School. Adding more
vehicles and activity without proper pedestrian infrastructure puts children and
everyday walkers at real risk.
> Privacy Issues:
The design includes elevated windows and balconies that look straight into
neighbouring yards and living spaces. There’s not enough separation or screening, and
the layout doesn’t reflect even basic privacy expectations for surrounding homes.
> Overshadowing and natural light-flow
The proposed height will cast long shadows over many surrounding homes, reducing
natural light in both indoor and outdoor areas. This directly conflicts with planning
guidelines that require developments to protect solar access for neighbours.
> Significant view loss
The scale of the building would permanently remove established views that are part of
the area’s character and everyday amenity. The proposal doesn’t demonstrate fair
view-sharing or any real sensitivity to the existing landscape.
> Noise Impacts
Construction noise and ongoing activity will significantly increase disturbance for
nearby homes. With properties sitting so close to the site, noise spillover into early
mornings, evenings, and weekends is almost guaranteed — and the plans don’t oƯer
meaningful mitigation.
> Recommended Changes:
The design needs a rethink. Under the LMRH, the tallest buildings should sit between
the Post Office land and the upper side of Muston Street, with heights stepping down
naturally toward Balmoral.
The Redan Street section should be capped at five levels maximum to maintain
sunlight, privacy, and some level of outlook for existing homes while still allowing
balanced development across the precinct.
> Summary
For these reasons, I request that the development application be refused or significantly
amended. In its current form, the proposal doesn’t reflect responsible,
community-minded planning and would create long-term negative impacts for local
residents.

I have lived in Mosman for 75 years. I am familiar with the area of the planned development 40-48 Redan Street because my husband's cousin lived at 35 Almora Street, corner of Redan Lane, and for many years and I delivered Meals-On-Wheels to residents in Redan Street using Redan Lane for easier access to their properties. I object to the development for the following reasons.
The 10 storey concrete block is inconsistent with the surrounding neighbourhood buildings. We call this area Balmoral slopes and it was considered important enough to include it in the Mosman Scenic Protection Area. Houses have been renovated, gardens landscaped, new apartment buildings are 3 storeys near Military Road and the private girl's school closer to Balmoral Beach was rebuilt to blend in with the contours of the area. This proposed development has no redeeming features that connect it to the surrounding area or the local character that is Mosman.
Affect on nearby properties. I have heard residents directly affected by this proposed development speak at public meetings. I can sympathise with their distress at the thought of a massive 10 storey concrete block looming over their properties. Once they had an open vista, perhaps harbour views, gardens to look at, thoughts of never being built out, privacy. Now they have loss of privacy, 10 storeys of neighbours or maybe a concrete wall, overshadowing, loss of landscaping and at least 100 extra cars to contend with.
Excavation for foundations and car parking. Will the excavation cause movement affecting surrounding properties? What recourse do property owners have? This is apparently a very deep excavation into sandstone. SMH article (27/03/26) reports on sections of a heritage building in Rose Bay collapsing due to excavation works. The developer said it was a "freak accident" due to "flawed geotechnical advice" and they had followed all the required guidelines! And still it happened. Same article reports houses in Botany and Kensington having to be evacuated due to nearby excavations "compromising the integrity of the properties". This could happen in Redan Street and surrounds.
What is the trade off for Mosman with this Redan Street development? I see nothing positive for Mosman. There seems to be nothing given back to the area if this development goes ahead. The schools are full (not everyone in apartments are empty nesters), traffic is already increasing (remember we have Balmoral and the Zoo), parking is difficult and public transport does its best. The sewage system is old and much work has been done in my area (north of Ourimbah Road) recently repairing collapsed pipework deep in the ground. Will it hold up with all these extra bathrooms etc? We have seen mains burst in Cremorne this month.
In my opinion this proposed development is a gift to developers from the state government to the detriment of the residents of Mosman.
I'm sure others will address the affordable housing part of this development. For me affordable housing in Mosman is surely an oxymoron.

I strongly object to the proposed tower development at 40-48 Redan St, Mosman. As a resident of 32 Redan Street for 11 years, where I live with my partner, our home is four lots south of the site and has frontage onto Redan Street, with car access to our double garage via Redan Lane.

While I am not against development in principle, it should fit the location and preserve the area's character. The proposed design, SSD-93020230, is demonstrably excessive in height, bulk, and scale, leading to much higher density for both residents and vehicles.

Unsympathetic Design Concerns
The plan for a 10-storey building with two basement levels and 106 parking spaces does not match the current streetscape, which traditionally features low-rise homes with large setbacks and landscaped gardens. Adjacent properties, including the heritage semidetached houses at 36 and 38 Redan Street, would suffer from loss of light, overshadowing, visual disruption, and reduced amenity. Similarly, properties at 50 and 52 Redan Street would be overwhelmed by the massive scale of the new building.

Community View Disruption
Our area offers stunning views of Middle Harbour, Manly, and Sydney Heads, enjoyed by residents, numerous visitors and tourists. The disproportionate scale in terms of height and width of this development will obliterate these views for not only residents but a far greater number of people who visit the area.

Heritage Considerations
Balmoral slopes are recognised for their heritage value and fall within the Mosman Scenic Protection Area, an important part of the Sydney Harbour landscape. Since the 1960s, both state and local authorities have protected Mosman’s foreshore. The Scenic Protection Zone exists for preservation; changing it for one unsuitable development cannot be justified.

Impact on Traffic and Safety
Other developments are also proposed for Redan Street, Redan Lane, Upper Almora Street, and Muston Street. Approving all of these would bring in far more residents and vehicles than Redan Lane could handle—it is already too narrow for two vehicles and lacks a footpath for pedestrians. With 53 new dwellings and increased car numbers, pedestrian safety will be severely compromised. Our property is located immediately adjacent to the dog leg bend in Redan Lane and waste management trucks and other large vehicles struggle to manoeuvre the double bend. Two regular sedans cannot pass this bend and reversing by one vehicle is necessary. Additional traffic would make these movements impossible. Walking or driving we currently exit our garage with extreme care due to poor visibility; a “fish-eye” traffic mirror providing only meagre assistance with visibility. More vehicles, pedestrians, and construction activity would create serious safety risks that must not be ignored.

Exploitation of Affordable Housing Guidelines
The inclusion of eleven so-called affordable housing components should be called out as a blatant and cynical exploitation of guidelines to expand the scope and scale of the development. I understand the NSW Infill Affordable Housing pathway allows a 30% height increase if 15% of apartments can be deemed "affordable" for a minimum of 15 years. This equates to 11 of the 53 apartments. After 15 years, those units can be reassigned by the developer to whatever category they want.

Excavation, Sandstone, and Groundwater Risks
The proposal calls for deep excavation for two basement parking levels (106 spaces), raising concerns about altered water flow, especially given existing stormwater runoff issues in Redan Lane and a nearby sinkhole. Rainfall already increases runoff, and the planned excavation could make this problem worse.

In summary, the proposed development for 40-48 Redan Street should be rejected. I appreciate the opportunity to submit my objections.

I have lived in Mosman on Balmoral slopes since 1980 and I have a strong attachment to this suburb because of its village feel and mix of architectural styles and green space, including its green canopy and gardens. I do not live near the proposed development 40-48 Redan Street, Mosman, however I object to the development due to its:
- unsuitable bulk and scale for this residental street
- increased traffic flow in this residential street and the Mosman LGA
- increased pressure on infrastructure across the Mosman LGA
Redan Street is a leafy suburban street with low-rise properties on Balmoral slopes. As this 10 storey development proposal is to build on the hill, the bulk and scale of this proposal makes it completely out of character with the street and will result in a significant excessive visual intrusion on the slopes. Also, in times of climate change, surely losing plantings and soil cover is a threat to our ongoing amenity.
Mosman already has a huge traffic problem, with one main road going in and out of the suburb. Military Rd has 65,000 cars per day. Adding more traffic to this already gridlocked area is unsustainable. Also, parking in Mosman is currently very limited, and a development of this size will only add to this existing problem.
I have no objection to developments, however I believe these should be on the ridge line running along Military Rd and the immediate surrounding streets, close to public transport. Redan St is a long way from this area. I also support affordable housing, however this development creates an upstaris/downstairs precedent, where those in the 'affordable' apartments are required to enter via the back lane. I find this extremely offensive, socially divisive and discriminatory. I also find the temporary nature of the 'affordable' housing does not meet the government's objective for increased supply.
I believe the NSW government has reacted to the housing crisis rather than responded in an way that really helps those who need truly affordable housing. In my opinion, those who benefit from this new legislation are property developers, real estate agents, lawyers and investors such as, in this case, James Packer.
In summary, I do not think this proposed development is suitable for such a quiet residential area. While changing the streetscape of Redan St, it will also reduce the amenity of all who live in Mosman and certainly is not in the public interest. It also creates a dangerous precedent for future proposals, which is not in the long term interest of our local area.

To Whom It May Concern,

I am writing to formally object to the proposed State Significant Development at 40–48 Redan Street, Mosman.

We are a young family living locally in Mosman, with two small children who attend school and daycare in the area. We chose to live in Mosman specifically for its village character, heritage streetscape, and family-friendly environment. Our home is located within a heritage conservation area, and we are deeply invested in preserving the unique character and liveability of this community.

While we understand the need for thoughtful housing development, we have significant concerns regarding the scale, impact, and appropriateness of this proposal.

1. Incompatibility with Local Character and Heritage Conservation

Mosman is defined by its low-rise built form, heritage homes, and cohesive streetscapes. A development of this scale represents a fundamental departure from the established character of the area.

The proposed density and building form risk overwhelming the surrounding neighbourhood and undermining the heritage conservation values that residents rely on and have actively chosen to protect. Once lost, this character cannot be recovered.

2. Excessive Scale and Density

As a State Significant Development, this proposal bypasses typical local planning controls and introduces a level of density that is not consistent with the existing urban fabric. Mosman is not designed to accommodate high-rise or large-scale apartment living of this nature.

Developments of this scale set a concerning precedent for further overdevelopment in the area.

3. Traffic, Congestion and Safety Concerns

Redan Street and surrounding roads are narrow, steep, and already experience congestion, particularly during school drop-off and pick-up times.

An increase in residents, vehicles, and construction activity will:
- Significantly increase traffic volumes
- Reduce street safety for pedestrians, particularly children
- Exacerbate parking shortages
- Increase risks for cyclists and families navigating the area

For families like ours, who walk children to school and daycare daily, this presents a very real and immediate safety concern.

4. Inadequate Infrastructure to Support Growth

There is limited public transport servicing this immediate area, meaning additional residents will be heavily reliant on private vehicles. Existing infrastructure, including roads, parking, and pedestrian pathways, does not have the capacity to absorb the increased demand.

Without meaningful infrastructure upgrades, this development will place undue strain on the local community.

5. Impact on Residential Amenity and Liveability

The proposal will likely result in:
- Increased noise and disruption, both during and after construction
- Reduced privacy for neighbouring properties
- Increased overshadowing and loss of outlook
- A permanent change to the quiet, residential nature of the area

These impacts directly affect the daily lives of local families and diminish the qualities that make Mosman such a desirable place to live.

6. Cumulative Impact of Ongoing Development

This proposal must be considered in the context of broader planning changes and increased development activity across Mosman. The cumulative effect of multiple large developments risks fundamentally altering the suburb beyond recognition.

Incremental change of this scale, without appropriate planning and infrastructure, is not sustainable.

Conclusion

We strongly urge the Department to reconsider the scale and appropriateness of this proposal. Development in Mosman should be:
- Sensitive to heritage character
- Consistent with existing low-rise built form
- Supported by adequate infrastructure
- Designed with community safety and liveability as a priority

This proposal, in its current form, does not meet these principles.

As a local family, we ask that our concerns, and the long-term wellbeing of the Mosman community, be given genuine consideration in the assessment of this application.

Yours sincerely,
Kate
+61 413 014 684
94 Shadforth St, Mosman 2088

Objection to Development Application SSD-93020230 at 40 – 48 Redan Street, Mosman

Summary

I refer to State Significant Development Application SSD-93020230, which seeks consent for the “[d]emolition of existing dwellings; [c]onstruction of a 10-storey residential flat building comprising: 53 apartments (including 11 in-fill affordable housing apartments), two basement levels with parking for 106 cars, communal open space; and [a]ssociated works including site preparation, excavation, earthworks, landscaping and installation of services” at 40-48 Redan Street, Mosman (Site) (Development Application)

We are the owners and long-term residents of 59 Muston Street. We have lived on this site for 33 years. Our property, while further South down Redan Lane from this proposed Development Proposal would most definitely affect the enjoyment of our home. The sheer mass of this proposal will most certainly affect all homeowners in the vicinity. It will most certainly affect Northern Light to us, let alone those closer. It will most certainly change the whole character of the streetscape, which until recently was preserved by construction restraints in order to preserve the beauty of Balmoral Slopes. This is one of many proposed construction fires we will need to put out before our environment becomes unrecognisable. Further South of our property we have already put up with a sizeable construction at 22 Redan Lane. This has caused no end of disruption to our small Laneway and constant noise over the past two years. In fact the house across the laneway from that construction has lost considerable value due to the loss of view. While this may not, be now an acceptable argument (as it was in the past), it is a consideration, which should not be ignored. Many people living along the upper side of Balmoral Slopes saved and bought and yes, occasionally developed within the parameters of pre-existing Development Laws kept in place to protect the rights of all existing landowners in this area. Now, are we to lose all say over what was previously a Right?

We object most vehemently to this application, because, in our view, it represents an excessive departure from development rules that have for many years been in place to preserve the beauty and cohesiveness of Mosman Slopes. People travel from afar to enjoy this special Bay and the sheer mass of the proposed excavation raise serious questions about Site suitability, scenic impact, local character heritage settings, amenity and the public interest.

Many pages of ‘experts advice’, paid for indeed by the Developers themselves, are given as ‘so called proof of rightness’ for the proposed development. That the consent authority can honestly take this into account would be laughable if it were not so serious. Is acceptance of such advice (paid for by the Developers) even legal?

In the time available, we have not been able to retain advisors to analyse the proposal and provide us with appropriate advice. We do not have a bottomless pocket unlike some of these developers, James Packer and Time and Place – nor should we have to put up a huge sums of money to protect the relevance of our property and the affect this development will have on it, when previously Our Council did this for us. This process and timing has made an inequitable situation for the people who already reside here. The Council’s inability to ‘put pause’ to any large development proposals, while they formulate an alternative plan is ludicrous.

Height, Bulk, Scale and Suitability of the Site

Redan Street and its surrounding streets are characterised by houses with gardens and small developments that sit congenially together and agree with the area known as Balmoral Slopes. To allow the proposal of a 10 storey building with two basement levels and 106 car spaces within this vicinity and along a small laneway is a total departure from what aesthetically agrees with the surrounds. The extent of excavation and basement form reinforces that conclusion. How do we understand this development application will in anyway meet an affordable housing SSD pathway? If, there is going to be 11 in-fill small, so-called affordable apartments strategically placed in amongst excessively expensive apartments, one can only assume that there will be restrictions of amenities placed on those low-cost affordable apartments that the other apartments will enjoy. This surely will just intensify the patently obvious separation of haves and have-nots! One solution for increased affordable housing, most certainly does not fit all areas in NSW! There should be a measured approach that supports what is appropriate for each area. Mosman already has enough traffic; we would further suggest that the existing road infrastructure here, most certainly would not support another possible 106 cars settling in this small corner of Mosman!

Scenic Protection and Broader Visual Setting

This part of Mosman is not comprised of isolated suburban streets, but rather, directly forms part of the wider harbour landscape. It does in some ways act as a natural amphitheatre that surrounds the beautiful bay of Balmoral. The fall down to Balmoral Beach is gradual and rooflines are softened by a lot of green vegetation, including some very mature trees. This is something we need to preserve rather than tear down. We are not in the situation of Hong Kong Harbour yet, where land has to be reclaimed and multi storey buildings have to be built everywhere to the destruction of our existing natural harbour beauty. Once done, it cannot be taken back and future generations will wonder why we did not speak out louder!

Development in this setting should preserve the visual qualities of the foreshore slopes. The general public visit this very special area to enjoy the beach and surrounds, because it is so beautiful; it is also there to be enjoyed from the sea. It would be a catastrophe to allow such a mass, dominating and alien from what already exists.

Josephine and Greg Baker

I am writing to provide a submission regarding the proposed residential development at 40–48 Redan Street, Mosman.

I support the broader objective of increasing housing supply across Sydney. However, this proposal raises several concerns regarding scale, location, visual impact and whether it genuinely contributes to housing affordability. In its current form, the development appears inconsistent with the character of the surrounding residential area and risks creating significant impacts on neighbouring properties and local streets.

Affordable housing outcome
The project has been framed partly as delivering affordable housing. However, given the location and likely pricing of new apartments in Mosman, there is a legitimate concern that the majority of dwellings will effectively operate as luxury housing rather than meaningfully addressing housing affordability.

If the development proceeds, stronger safeguards should ensure that a meaningful proportion of dwellings are delivered as genuine affordable housing with clear eligibility criteria and long-term affordability commitments. Without these safeguards, the project risks using affordable housing provisions to justify a large development that primarily delivers high-value apartments.

Scale and neighbourhood character
Redan Street is a quiet residential street characterised predominantly by detached houses and relatively low-scale built form. Introducing a large apartment development in this location represents a significant departure from the existing streetscape and neighbourhood character.

Planning principles generally encourage higher density development to be located in areas with appropriate infrastructure capacity, strong public transport access and established higher-density development patterns. Quiet residential streets are typically not the most appropriate locations for large apartment buildings.

Approving a development of this scale in a predominantly low-density residential area risks setting an undesirable precedent and undermining the existing character of the neighbourhood.

Visual and view impacts
The site sits within a topographically sensitive part of Mosman where many surrounding properties enjoy established harbour and district views. Development on sloping sites can have disproportionate visual impacts, particularly when buildings increase in height and bulk.

A development of the scale proposed risks significantly affecting existing views, as well as creating visual dominance on the hillside. Protecting reasonable view sharing and maintaining the visual amenity of the area should be important considerations in assessing this proposal.

Traffic and local road impacts
Redan Street and surrounding streets are local residential roads designed primarily for low traffic volumes associated with detached housing.

A large apartment complex will inevitably increase vehicle movements, visitor parking demand and general activity within the street. This has the potential to increase congestion, create additional parking pressure and reduce residential amenity for existing residents.

Higher density development is more appropriate along major roads or within established centres where traffic capacity, transport access and urban design outcomes can better support increased density.

Need for reduced height and scale
If redevelopment of the site is considered appropriate, the proposal should be significantly revised to better respond to its residential context.

In particular, the development should:

– reduce building height
– reduce overall building bulk and scale
– minimise view impacts to neighbouring properties
– provide greater setbacks and landscaping
– better integrate with the existing streetscape

A lower-scale development would achieve a more appropriate transition within the neighbourhood and reduce the impacts on surrounding properties.

Conclusion
While additional housing supply is important, this proposal appears to prioritise development yield over appropriate urban design outcomes for the area. The scale, visual impact and location of the development raise legitimate concerns for the surrounding community.

I respectfully request that the NSW Planning reviews this proposal and requests amendments to the proposal, particularly relating to building height, scale and genuine affordable housing delivery. A reduced and better integrated development would provide a more appropriate balance between housing supply and the protection of neighbourhood amenity.

1. I believe the building is of such bulk and height that it is totally out of character with the environment and low streetscape atmosphere of the Harbourside suburb of Balmoral. Typically the area is made up of single homes many of a traditional Federation style. These need to be saves and cherished.
2. I see the building as an example of a developer taking advantage of the Government’s Affordable Housing. Although the building has a small number of so called affordable units the vast majority of apartments will be sold for upwards of $10 million , possibly some as much as $2O million. I based the assumption on recent sales in the area. Where is the planning to give hard working Australians who give to the community so much a chance to buy a home, the teachers and nurses and others?
3. To have a building divided into a section for the elite and another section for the battlers is unquestionably totally just plain unAustralian.
4. I live in an apartment on Muston Street directly behind the proposed building. It is where I’ve lived for thirty years and at the age of 83 plan to stay. My view of the harbour will be lost but more importantly as I face east the the morning sunrise and sense of the early morning will disappear. I will be in the shadow of eight stories of a building block. I did not have this in mind for the latter years of my life.
5. Should the building come to be I image the value of my apartment to drop by at least a third therefore a considerable financial loss. My apartment will be part of my children’s inheritance which would hopefully go to reducing their continuing struggles with their mortgages.

We are writing this submission to strongly object to the proposed Residential Development with In-Fill Affordable Housing 40-48 Redan Street Mosman SSD-93020230.
As the owners of 61A Muston Street Mosman, we have serious concerns about the massive bulk, the excessive height and the impact that this development would have on our property , our liveability, amenity, privacy, security and safety, as well as for all surrounding residences and the Mosman community as a whole. Our objection is based on the following issues:
INAPPROPRIATE OVERDEVELOPMENT, MASSIVE BULK AND EXCESSIVE HEIGHT:
The proposed development extends through Redan Street to Redan Lane and covers an area of over 3,000 sq metres. It adjoins two heritage houses of significant heritage listing.
Our residence is located four houses to the south of the development on the western side of Redan Lane. Due to the height of the proposed 10-12 storey building, it would be a towering edifice overlooking our living areas, main bedroom and garden terrace, compromising our privacy, sense of security and wellbeing as we go about our daily lives.
The size and bulk is extreme and totally contrary to the aims of the Mosman Council Local Environment Plane (LEP)2012. The LEP aims to provide for the housing needs of the community within a medium density residential environment. The LEP also provides for character protection. The proposal does not blend with nearby architecture or support local character in any respect. It does in fact propose to destroy five residence of superb character.
The increase in height to 10-12 storeys is due to the inclusion of so-called affordable housing units. It is questionable whether this development will be a genuine contribution to affordable housing.
While appreciating the need for increasing housing supply this type of development is best suited to a major multi-lane transport corridor such as the ridge along Military Road and Spit Road, rather than a relatively narrow residential street some two streets below the ridgeline down the Balmoral slopes.
LIVEABILITY AND AMENITY:
The proposal is contrary to many of the aims of the Mosman Council's LEP 2012 and their objectives when assessing development applications.
The extreme height and bulk will cause overshadowing severely impacting surrounding properties causing loss of sunlight, natural light and privacy. In turn this will have a detrimental effect on the liveability and amenity for everyone affected. The proposal will directly affect our liveability and amenity but even more so for many of our neighbours and in particular the Heritage houses, 36 and 38 Redan Street due to their close proximity to this massive development.
VIEW LOSS:
The aims of Mosman Council when considering development applications have always been that views, particularly harbour views, are to be shared. This requirement is also included in the State Environment Planning Policy (Housing) which states that residential development is to have regard to local amenity, and in particular, public and private views.
The proposal will totally block a portion of our north easterly harbour view which we currently enjoy from our living areas. It will be absolutely catastrophic for numerous residences on both sides of Muston Street who will have their harbour views either totally obliterated or severely impacted.
This would be a devastating loss which will reduce the amenity and inherent value of ours and all affected properties.
TRAFFIC AND ROAD SAFETY:
Our property has a street frontage on Muston Street and also on Redan Lane. Our garage is accessed via Redan Lane along which we travel daily. Redan Lane which borders the western side of the development is a narrow service lane barely wide enough for two cars to pass each other and for one car to pass a parked car. It is often blocked by large delivery, construction or trade vehicles. Furthermore it has a difficult dog-leg corner with restricted visibility just to the south of the proposal.
The additional traffic as a result of this 53 apartment multi storey development, eg service vehicles, delivery and waste service trucks as well as cars, will further affect traffic flow along the lane and be detrimental to the safety of all road users in the vicinity of this problematic laneway.
The laneway has very limited on street parking and no continuous designated footpaths. The safety of pedestrians who use this lane is at risk. This would particularly apply to the residents of the so-called 'Affordable Housing Units' who have their direct pedestrian access via Redan Lane.
When entering or leaving the Balmoral Slopes of Mosman, road traffic has limited options. The majority of vehicles must either cross Military or Spit Roads where there is already major congestion particularly during peak times and School drop-offs /pickups.
Accessing Military Road from Upper Almora Street, the closest uphill intersection to the development, at any time of day is problematic and pedestrian safety is of major concern. The additional traffic movements due to this proposed development, with parking for 106 vehicles, more than ten times that of the five houses the development proposes to replace , will adversely affect traffic flow and safety at this intersection and in all nearby streets.
Redan Lane has residential garages along both sides from Raglan to Upper Almora Streets which hold in excess of 130 carspaces. There is already limited visibility for vehicles exiting at either end of the lane. The increase in road and pedestrian traffic due to the occupiers of the his multi storey building will further compromise safety at either end of the Lane.
IN CONCLUSION:If this development is approved it will set a precedent to destroy the character, inherent value, amenity and privacy of existing homes without consideration or compensation. It will have negative consequences for the ethos of Mosman Village which has always been protected by Mosman Council and cherished by its residents. Once lost it will be gone forever.
This type of large scale multi storey development is best suited to a major multi lane transport thoroughfare such as the ridge line along Military and Spit Roads rather than a two lane residential street.
The present height of the buildings along Military Road from Neutral Bay to Spit Junction is mostly two to four storeys with only an occasional one perhaps approaching the size of this proposal. There is huge scope for this type of development along Military Road which would also be better suited to multi storey apartment buildings and more affordable to the wider community rather than the highly priced super luxury apartments proposed by the developers of this project.

MARGARET AND PETER TITLEY
61A MUSTON STREET, MOSMAN