It has come to my attention that the developer Level 33 intends to start developing the site at 300 Burns Bay Road Lane Cove 2066 before they have planning permission.
This seems to be putting the cart before the horses and may lead to the site becoming derelict if they do not get permission. Which would be detrimental to the area.
if you give permission to start please could the attached conditions be applied to the process.

1. All built form to be removed, other than the removal of the lowest level of slabs/hard surfaces across the subject site, to ensure exposed soils do not create a dust bowl affect until permanent works begin.
2. No removal of soil.
3. No removal of trees until permanent works approved.
4. Site to be continually swept and watered until permanent works are approved to reduce dust and annoyance.

Prior to commencement of demolition works the following are to be developed:
1.Construction environment management plan.
2. Construction traffic and pedestrian management plan.
3. Construction noise and vibration management plan.
4. Air quality management plan.
5.Construction waste management plan. Including Asbestos.
6. Soil and water management plan.
7. Remediation action plan. Disposal of seepage and storm water. Erosion and sediment control
8. Utilities and services action plan.
9. Uncovering of relics or aboriginal objects plan.

Which are supported by:
A. Survey certificate.
B. Pre-construction dilapidation reports.
C. Protection of public infrastructure and trees.
D. Unexpected finds protocol.
E. Notification of commencement of works .
F. Dial before you dig services.
G. Water access licence.
H . If non compliance occurs ,notification notice to be broadcast to the public.

During construction including demolition the following to posted on site and online:
Hours of construction.
Management plans implementation outline.
Construction noise and vibration limits.
Air quality ( small particle limits from diesel use and dust from demolition { quite a lot of medical evidence that they are detrimental to health} ) ? use of battery powered equipment on site)
Contact telephone number or email address.
Yours faithfully R Bailey-Smith

No early works should be done at all.
The D.A. needs to be approved with all environment impact plans also approved.
If the development does not go ahead, and early works are approved, we are left with a mutilated area, taking away from the character of our lovely area.
Why isn't it illegal to do early works when something hasn't even been approved.

To whomever it may concern
I'm writing as a resident of 290 Burns Bay Road to object to the early works application for 300 Burns Bay Road.
The application is still being assessed, with significant revisions requested and major issues still outstanding.
It makes no sense to approve demolition and site clearing while that process is still playing out.
Early works should simply not go ahead until there's a final decision on the main proposal.
Knocking down the building, removing trees and clearing the site are all things that can't be undone.
If the main development is later refused or scaled back, the site will have already been permanently changed for nothing.
That's not a reasonable outcome for the local community to accept.
The existing trees and vegetation are part of what makes this area what it is.
Removing them before anyone has actually approved a development here would be a real and lasting loss to the area, one that benefits nobody at this stage except the developer.
If it is approved, I'd ask that strong conditions be attached, no tree or vegetation removal, no soil removal, no earthworks beyond what's needed for basic demolition safety, no dust, and all management plans signed off before anything starts.
We're honestly still waiting for the initial decision to be made in terms of directions for the site and what can be built here.
All the best
Dori and Lara Adler

Please see the attached letter

I am a resident living immediately adjacent to the site, located to the north‑west of the proposal (south‑west of my building complex).

I have concerns about the impacts of the proposed early works, including demolition, excavation, tree removal, and remediation.

Key Concerns:
- Noise and vibration:
Demolition and excavation will generate significant noise and vibration impacting nearby residents. I also have two domestic cats that are sensitive to prolonged disturbance.
I request strict construction hours, and real-time noise and vibration monitoring with enforceable limits.

- Property and structural risk:
Given the proximity of works, I request pre- and post-construction dilapidation surveys, independent monitoring, and clear responsibility for any damage.

- Tree removal and wildlife:
Tree loss will reduce amenity and affect local fauna, including possums observed on site.
I request a fauna management plan, pre-clearing surveys, and appropriate relocation measures, along with replacement planting.

- Dust and remediation:
Remediation and earthworks may impact air quality.
I request effective dust suppression, air quality monitoring, and transparent reporting.

- Traffic and access:
Construction traffic should be managed to minimise disruption, including restrictions on heavy vehicle timing and provision of on-site worker parking.

Conclusion:
Given my immediate proximity to the site, with my bedroom located approximately 3 metres from the site boundary, I am likely to experience direct and significant impacts from the proposed works. I therefore request that strict and enforceable conditions be imposed to minimise impacts on neighbouring residents and the surrounding environment.

One of the key reasons my family chose to live in Lane Cove was its green, leafy character and strong connection to nature. The existing trees and vegetation are an important part of what makes this neighbourhood special. They provide habitat for wildlife, improve the local environment, and contribute significantly to the amenity and wellbeing of residents.

I am concerned that approving early works which involve clearing vegetation or altering the site before the main proposal has been fully assessed could permanently damage the character of the area. Once trees and vegetation are removed, they cannot be easily replaced. I believe the site should remain in its current state until the planning process has been completed and all impacts have been properly considered.

Early works before the full details of the project are agreed have the potential to cause more damage to the natural environment than is necessary. The site is home to native wildlife, and removal of their habitat before the final development outcome will potentially unnecessarily harm and kill native wildlife. Excavating, removing trees, and leaving the ground uncovered for potentially months and months leaves problems with runoff and dust that aren't necessary at this early stage. Works will mean the movement of heavy machinery through the site, surrounding roads, etc causing disruption to traffic and potential danger to residents; attempting to negotiate the roads again is not necessary at this early stage. Our previous planning advice was that strict controls would need to be in place for traffic, dust, noise, and restrictions on soil and tree removal, and these controls are not yet in place.
For all of these reasons I object strongly to the early works application for this site.