There is no provision for compensating 2nd neighbouring farmers for potential losses due to the project.

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

I object to the above as renewable energy is hazardous and will contaminate regional environments and may catch fire and cause toxic smoke and asthma and asthma-like health hazards in that event.

It is a myth that “renewable” energy is better. It is NOT better or CHEAPER than coal-fired base-load power by any stretch. This is also a national security issue when our services and assets are owned offshore. This is not in Australia’s best interests and anyone thinking or pushing that has a loyalty to somewhere other than Australia and should be held accountable.

The Environmental Impact Study does not include a comprehensive assessment of the project’s impact on local agriculture.

This terrible plan is all about Control & Destruction of Rural Identity!
I object to this destructive company industrialising our precious agricultural heritage and landscapes under a false banner of "sustainability."

I object to Predatory Developers like greedy, deceitful Spark Renewables - who exploit weak planning laws and local communities for private profit—leaving irreversible public damage.

See attachment

There is no clear plan to protect local water resources from potential contamination.

Potential leaks pose a risk of soil contamination, affecting agricultural productivity. What is the mitigation for this?

The development may disrupt local systems, affecting stock grazing yields.