Skip to main content
DAVID Smith
Object
BAYVIEW , New South Wales
Message
very concerned about location of entrances . on a step hill near a crest which will be very dangerous .
extra sewage flow on an already overloaded catchment ... Sydney water Warriewood is at capacity and have refused requests from Bayview Golf Club to Sewer Mine reducing this and all local volumes flowing onto pumping station in Darley St West and onto warriewood treatment plant .
Name Withheld
Object
BAYVIEW , New South Wales
Message
The project would cause significant disruption to the sewage treatment plant as the one in warriewood is already over capacity, additionally increased traffic flow through recognised black spots increases risk not just for residents in the area but for other people travelling through. Consequently it must be decided whether this development is worth the risk of mortality due to the heightened conflict between motorists, cyclists and pedestrians. The implementation of this development would also further undermine recent safety improvements to the area and cause further money to be spent on continually updating traffic regulation and precaution measures. Therefore, this small area is undeniably unsuitable for a development of this scale due to the increase in likelihood of fatalities, unsuitable sewage treatment options and the ongoing upkeep needed to attempt to maintain a safe and healthy environment for both residents and biodiversity.
Name Withheld
Object
BAYVIEW , New South Wales
Message
I am objecting to the developement for the following reasons.:
Impact on the local community,
- Increase in traffic , not only exacerbating the already growing congestion issue but also greatly increasing risk of further fatal accidents (there have been multiple fatalaties over the years within 100 meters of the proposed developement.)
- The already limited parking will be streteched to breaking point both during the proposed construction , and with the increase in staff and patient numbers (ie visitors of the patients).
-We have been advised that the warriewood sewage treatment plant is already struggling to meet existing requirements . During significant rain events (that have been increasing) the plant has been unable to cope with raw to partially treated sewage ending up on the local beaches
- We have pair of kites that have been here for years and recently had offspring, whose habitat will be dramatically affected by the proposed developement
- The noise and light pollution from the proposed development will impact the local environment
Name Withheld
Object
BAYVIEW , New South Wales
Message
This development will have a significant impact on our local community
1.Parking is a premuim at the best of times with the extra workers and visitors to the facility where are they to park!
2.During a smaller build recently in Utingu place we could not get to our property and at times were significantly held up leaving the street,as the construction parking had blocked access- hopefully no one required emergency services at those times
3.We have a beautiful eagle family (Square-Tailed Kites) that have been around for years - their habitat will be impacted greatly
4.The ambiant light will change as this development will be a 24hr facility,also the noise will increase with the staff changing shifts
5.The local road-Cabbage Tree Road has had some major and fatal accidents in the past, whilst improvements have been made to the black spot area -More traffic will undermine these safey issues
6.The construction time over several years on smaller residential streets will cause absolute havoc
7.The warriewood sewage treatment plant is at capicity and will not cope with the extra demand and we will see more leakge !!
I reserve the right to add an addendumto my submission at a later date
Name Withheld
Object
BAYVIEW , New South Wales
Message
I object to this project as I have major traffic and pollution concerns. I currently live on a culdesac on the corner of Cabbage Tree Road and the traffic on Cabbage Tree Road is already busy and getting busier. It's very dangerous for any car on Cabbage Tree Road to exit their driveways and it's even difficult to drive out of streets and access Cabbage Tree Road these days. On top of that, there is no street parking anywhere on Cabbage Tree Road despite their being ample space between the road and the golf course. As there is no parking, our street is constantly full of cars from people living on Cabbage Tree Road. This will only get worse with a large development on Annam Road. It's a dangerous concern as the cul-de-sac gets so full that cars park very close to the corner which severely impacts safety when pulling in and out.
I am also concerned about the amount of pollution from this development. Any single item that gets blown onto the street typically ends up in the drains or in the creek at Bayview Golf Course. There is no gutter on Cabbage Tree Road south side which means water and pollution flows straight into the creek and straight into Pittwater. How the council can currently allow that is beyond me, let alone with a huge new development.
Please put a stop to this. The area is busy enough and can't handle any more large infrastructure.
Northern Beaches Council
Object
DEE WHY , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
BAYVIEW , New South Wales
Message
This is already a busy area and there are already 2 aged care facilities on cabbage tree road, and one in Minkara Avenue. Bayview doesn’t need another one. This is a residential area!
Name Withheld
Object
BAYVIEW , New South Wales
Message
Submission — Objection
Name of Resident: George Gomez
Address: 24 Utingu Pl, Bayview, 2104, NSW
Project: Opal Healthcare Bayview — SSD-77240466
Location: 36–42 Cabbage Tree Road, Bayview
Proposal summary (as exhibited): demolition and redevelopment for a three-
storey residential care facility (177 beds) with basement parking, cross-title driveway
works and subdivision from the Aveo Bayview Gardens Retirement Living site.


I am a local resident and I object to the proposal because some key matters required by the Housing SEARs are not demonstrated to an assessment-ready standard in the exhibited EIS, and because the proposal relies on cross-title arrangements that must be shown to be legally enforceable and operationally safe for the life of the development.
I am particularly worried that the EIS construction program (demolition 3 weeks, excavation 4 weeks, construction 50 weeks, fit out 10 weeks) still represents a long disruption period for close by residents and must be assessed and mitigated as a cumulative social impact, not treated as a short-term inconvenience.
During resident engagement call with the ‘Opal Engagement team’ concern was raised that delivery may extend closer to three years once contingencies and staging constraints are accounted for, and this potential extended duration should also be assessed.
I have also noted that the EIS does not demonstrate to an assessment-ready standard the cumulative impacts of the proposal across transport and access safety, tree removal and biodiversity risk, and others as shown below, and that enforceable mitigation and monitoring is required across these matters for the full duration of works and ongoing operation.
This submission is purely related to planning assessment matters and evidence-based concerns and is provided in accordance with the Department’s exhibition process and publication requirements.
Key isk issues requiring resolution before any consent is granted are provided in the attchment.
Attachments

Pagination

Subscribe to