I agree that RAID Moorebank is also acting on my behalf and that of the community
I object to this application and the entire project at this location.

I agree that RAID Moorebank is also acting on my behalf and that of the community
I object to this application and the entire project at this location.
This will have a negative impact on the environment, traffic and health of the people living in the area

I agree that RAID Moorebank is also acting on my behalf and that of the community
I object to this application and the entire project at this location.
I agree that RAID Moorebank is also acting on my behalf and that of the community
I object to this application and the entire project at this location.
There is too much at risk in this community for this application to be approved. Numerous schools, aged care facilities, hard working men and women trying to secure there one asset, the family home, their one piece of property to bring up their families in this unique location, where the bush surrounds them and wildlife. This application will destroy this and impact on everyone. The M5 at Moorebank Ave, is a nightmare, risk your life now, with an influx of trucks there is no certainty of going anywhere on the most used road in Sydney. I strongly oppose this application.

I agree that RAID Moorebank is also acting on my behalf and that of the community
I object to this application and the entire project at this location.
It would have a devastating effect on the community, environment, businesses and homeowners.

I agree that RAID Moorebank is also acting on my behalf and that of the community
I object to this application and the entire project at this location.
This project will effect the M5 which i travel on daily. Its congested enough now and the funds would be better spent on upgrading the highway

I agree that RAID Moorebank is also acting on my behalf and that of the community
I object to this application and the entire project at this location.
We don't want this in our backyard it should have been at the crossroads from day one,

I agree that RAID Moorebank is also acting on my behalf and that of the community
I object to this application and the entire project at this location.
To place this type of infrastructure within the dormitory suburbs of Liverpool shows a total disregard for the well being of the residents of the area. We and our children are NOT expendable!

I agree that RAID Moorebank is also acting on my behalf and that of the community
I object to this application and the entire project at this location.

The SIMTA Proposal is to place a major transport hub within close proximity to an established housing estate at Wattle Grove NSW 2173 to justify the proposal the consortium has engaged professional services of consultants whom have assessed the proposal as benign.
I am a land holder resident of Wattle Grove NSW 2173 therefore am entitled to take issue with the proposal by this corporate entity which has the potential to introduce toxic materials in great quantity causing risk of exposure of my family and property to great danger or damage to health in a fire incident and even in normal operations not involving fire incident.
I do not believe containment of pollution emissions from introduced heavy vehicle traffic and rail diesel locomotives can be achieved. The community would bear the cost of health damage to the benefit of the SIMTA without recourse to recover funds not involving complex legal action and risk of failure in the courts. In addition the SIMTA proposal may produce the requirement for double glazing of Brick Veneer Homes which are more readily noise affected by unwanted emissions. Outdoor activities would be affected for residents reducing fitness of the community overall.
I believe the proposed Retrofitting of such a proposed land use with so many residents to be put at risk is an irresponsible proposition and as such should not be accepted by responsible government or officials.

My name is Allan Corben of 13 Woolmers Court Wattle Grove 2173. I wish to submit the following submission on MPE Stage 2 application - SSD 7628, document 3 of 3. My objections are noted below in red font.
Table 20-18 Page 146. Potential operational impacts and mitigation on surrounding properties The noise modeling has predicted that operation of the warehousing and freight village and road traffic associated with the Proposal would not exceed the relevant noise assessment criteria, hence additional measures to mitigate noise impacts associated with these components of the Proposal are not proposed. Again I object to the wording "additional measures to mitigates noise are not proposed" Additional noise mitigation will need to be installed due to the fact that the southern area (Refer attached map) of Wattle Grove does not have any proposed mitigation to protect the residents from rail wheel squeal, Locomotive and rail wagon noise and as previously stated, noise wall installed along the full length of the eastern boundary of the MPE site should Moorebank ave be diverted.
We already have the situation at Port Botany where people living within a radius of three kilometres of the terminal are suffering sleep disturbance. In the case of Moorebank, we have many people living as close as 390 metres from the MPE site. What has happened at Botany must not in any circumstances be repeated at Moorebank, and to allow it to happen would be a failure of NSW Planning and PAC'S dereliction of duty.
My contact details are as follows, Email: [email protected] , Phone: 0451 998 774
Yours Sincerely,
Allan Corben