Dear Sir/Madam,

Objection to the proposed new Harbourside Shopping Centre

Whereas I understand that the existing building could do with updating, I object to the huge increase in mass and height of the proposed new shopping centre.

The harbour forseshore would be hemmed in by these new big buildings and the new proposal seems to be right on top of Pyrmont Bridge. All buildings so close to the water should be low rise and stepped back to allow as much light and space so that pedestrians can enjoy walking around the promenade and not feel overshadowed. The bridge should be separate and be seen by all around Darling Harbour.

There is no need for the new development to be so big and high, it looks like it is double the height of the existing shopping centre. There are already so many new retail centres so close, do we need another one so huge?

Pyrmont is not the CBD and it seems to be the aim of the developers to destroy the charm and heritage of the Pyrmont area and the historic Pyrmont Bridge.

Please give Darling Harbour back to the people of Sydney and not to the developers

Yours faithfully,

Name withheld

Dear Sir/Madam,

Objection to Harbourside Shopping Centre redevelopment - northern podium in particular

I bought my apartment in "One Darling Harbour" 50 Murray Street on a lower level 3 in 2007, and I strongly object to the dramatically increased height of the proposed northern podium and the closeness of this development to the historic Pyrmont Bridge

The impact that the new much higher proposed development will have a devastating negative impact on my apartment which enjoyed far ranging views to the east and south east of the city sky line and view into Cockle Bay itself. It will cause significant, unreasonable and unjustified view loss contrary to the requirements of the Tenacity principle and those expressed by the Independent Urban Design Review.

The proposed northern podium is 6 storeys, practically double the height of the existing shopping centre and there is no justification for this dramatic increase. The northern podium structure potentially will totally dominate the historic Pyrmont Bridge, and is way too close to the actual bridge.

This heritage pedestrian bridge which is the busiest in the southern hemisphere should be seen as a separate structure from all view points in Darling Harbour and not be overwhelmed and encroached upon by an oversized new building

The proposal's new height and closeness to Pyrmont Bridge detracts from the values associated with it's State heritage listing, and it entirely inconsistent with the aims and principals of the SREP relating to forseshore and waterway scenic qualities, enhancement and protection of views and Heritage Conservation.

The increased height proposal and resultant significant view loss in excess of what is caused by the existing shopping centre is unnecessary and unreasonable and there is no justification for the proposed dramatic height increase and increased massing of the northern podium.

I hope that you will curb the greed of the Harbourside developer and consider the people who actually live in Darling Harbour and all those who enjoy the Darling Harbour foreshore and the air and space around the historic Pyrmont Bridge.

Yours faithfully,

Name Withheld

I acknowledge that the current proposal from Mirvac for the redevelopment of Harbourside shopping centre responds to many of the objections raised heretofore. The relocation of the tower away from Pyrmont Bridge and the lowering of the podium in its vicinity have eased the assault on its heritage value that previous proposals had made. It is still an obtrusive and insensitive neighbour. Whatever the vaunted Guardian Square is guarding, it is certainly not heritage values.

I object to the crowding of our foreshore by overlarge developments. Cockle Bay is a very small inlet and has been kindly treated in the past by low lying buildings and wide public promenades. These enabled a little passenger train to run around the bay to the delight of visitors but this has of course been cast aside and the little winding pool now has a huge building looming over it. The current proposal would multiply the disadvantages already suffered.

In regard to my own situation I see that the effect on my views is regarded as ‘serious’ but not, thank heavens, as ‘devastating’.

It is acknowledged that I will still be able to see the sky and the top of Centrepoint Tower. The proposal is incorrect in its description of my present view as being half composed of Darling Driveway and the shopping centre with minor glimpses of water and Pyrmont Bridge with the remaining view predominantly consisting of the skyline. If this were the case, the proposed changes would have little effect and would not have been classified as ‘serious’.

I cannot see Darling Drive at all from my unit. I see the roof of Harbourside, the water and marina with its boats on the far side, the promenade and cafes with people strolling and pennants waving and the full extent of the Bridge except for its westernmost exit. I have the delightful scene at night of the city buildings’ windows alight, the neon signs blazing above and the ferris wheel twirling in its kaleidoscope of colour. I can see Gowings sign, the dome above the QVB Tearooms, and even the trees in Hyde Park at the top of Market St. All of this would be taken from me and my Level 2 neighbours by the gross extension of the shopping centre’s height.

harbourside shopping centre locate on the water edge. any high rise building shouln't build on this location.but the redevopment proposal keep try put a super high residental building on as we already objected before. this time they in accordance with the draft pyrmont peninsula place special consideration as excuse. the draft pyrmont peninsula place against public interest. try put tall high rise into pyrmont .special in land approach to the water. as pyrmont community members. we strong objected the draft considerations.
we wish any building develop on the water edge should be dedicated all rules and strict control on low rise limit.

As a long term Pyrmont resident, it is refreshing to see the next iteration of this development proposal. I am pleased to see the previous concerns addressed, including moving the tower away from Pyrmont Bridge. I also very much support the overall look of the development, extension of the public walkaway and I really like the greenery to be planted as part of the new building.
I support this proposal and very much hope it is the first step in much overdue revival of Harbourside as well as Pyrmont Peninsula

Size/height of the building is too high, this spoils the character of the area/ side of the harbour which is mostly low rise. (already spoiled by the Hotel!)
The height of the building will shade not only the western side, but also reach the eastern side, its a playground where people like sunshine. this will make it unattractive in winter in particular.
The extra accommodation and office space will increase traffic, both vehicles and foot. The road leading to that side has been reduced to a single lane.
There is already enough tall buildings surrounding this beautiful harbour ...please no more!

29th October 2020

Dr Muddappa Prabhu & Dr Savita Prabhu
Apartment 1003 level 10
50 Murray Street
Pyrmont
NSW 2009
Australia



Re objection to proposed Harbour side tower and podium Development
Ref: Application No SSD-7874

Dear sir
We are resident of an apartment 1003 50 Murray street One Darling Harbour
I bought the property with good intention of enjoying the Darling Harbour vista view and the heritage view of the beautiful Pyrmont bridge

Recent submission changes of modified development application of Harbourside by Mirvac group undertaken very small part of podium level changes on the northern side close to the Pyrmont Bridge compare to previous proposal
I have to bring your kind notice changes made to recent application by Mirvac only eye washing reducing the podium height to very small portion of northern side close to Pyrmont Bridge, where as bulk of the podium height still maintained without any changes

Please note main views of the northern side apartment residents of the 50 Murray Street is not towards the main side of the Darling Harbour
Main views of the Darling Harbour is for eastern side apartments of Murray street residents like our apartment
The new limited height reduction of northern section of podium is not addresses the issue which has been raised in our previous objection letter

In fact Mirvac new proposal gaining more height to the tower ignoring the main bulk of objection to the Murray street residents appears corporate money grabbing proposal

As we have pointed out in our previous application the height of podium which is equivalent to 7 story (25 to 30 meter) should also be reduced to the same level proposed northern podium height giving the residents of Murray street view of the Darling Harbour which we feel are entitled after spending considerable investment in the Murray street properties to enjoy the beautiful view of the Darling Harbour

We strongly object to new Mirvac proposal claiming they have taken into consideration of Murray street residents objection while reducing podium height by meager part at the northern side

Pyrmont Bridge is listed as state Heritage registered key feature of the Darling Harbour
Over development of buildings would diminish the heritage context of the bridge
Any Development with in this area should serve to enhance the tourism and entertainment attractions keeping in mind over development like Mirvac proposals May result in clusters of buildings loosing the open feeling of Darling Harbour

It is also my understanding a Pyrmont precinct Master plan is under development.
Taking this view into consideration the current Mirvac proposal is premature
Like all Development in the Pyrmont precinct, redevelopment of Harbourside shopping Centre should be undertaken in accordance with unified, contemporary and transparent system of planning controls that has been developed in consultation with community

It is with above information I strongly object to the Mirvac current proposals more so with Podium height which is in excess, should be limited to 15 to 16 meter giving the 50 Murray street residential to enjoy the view of not only Heritage Pyrmont Bridge but also the Darling Harbour views

Kind regards

Dr Muddappa Prabhu

Dr Savita Prabhu

There needs to be cohesion for this development to be of benefit for the community. It seems like there is no real public space it’s become a private residence at the expense of our shopping centre

The building should be restricted to a height of neighbouring Sofitel Hotel that is 132metres and should be for commercial use not residential. This is a commercial precinct and there is ample residential accommodation within the city limits. Also the height will most certainly create overshadowing issues within Darling Harbour ruining the recreational experiences of the community as a whole in the precinct.