Skip to main content
Pam Maegdefrau
Object
Montville , Queensland
Message
I would like to object to the Santos proposal to drill to mine in the Pilliga Region. Australia is currently one of the biggest producers of Natural Gas in the world. Despite the dishonesty from politiciaans who support more and more mining, for this Nation more extractive industries are NOT essential. What is more essential is that we focus on developing sustainable energy sources, an industry that can create many desireabl;e jobs in new technologies that could lead the world.

The policies of present Governments to continue in old world thinking; supporting and implementing new extractive, dangerous and destructive activities is sheer madness. We need to work towards a country that creates sustainable activities, protect our agricultural industries and focus on developing an energy policy that is sustainable and non destructive. A policy that acknowledges and embraces the scientific evidence that human activity is creating global warming.

Without acceptance that the behaviour that we have embraced is completely catastrophic for the future of this Nation, we cannot go forward and save our animals, our reef and the environment.

We do NOT need to keep mining extractive industries, we need to be smarter that that to give our future generations a healthy future.
Stephen Swayne
Object
Maleny , Queensland
Message
1. The Narrabri Gas Project risks precious water sources, including the Great Australian Basin--Australia's largest groundwater aquifer.

The Narrabri gasfield poses a real risk to our two most precious water resources: the Great Artesian Basin and the Murray-Darling Basin. The area of the Great Artesian Basin with the highest recharge rates is almost entirely contained within the Pilliga East forest. In a worst-case scenario, the water removed for CSG extraction could reduce water pressure in the recharge areas--potentially stopping the free flow of waters to the surface at springs and bores across the whole Great Artesian Basin.

Creeks in the Pilliga run into the Namoi River--a part of the Murray Darling Basin. This system is vulnerable to contamination from drilling fluid spills and the salty treated water produced from the proposed 850 wells.

2. The Gamilaraay Traditional Custodians are opposed.

There are hundreds of cultural sites as well as songlines and stories connecting the Gamilaraay to the forest and to the groundwater beneath. Gamilaraay people are deeply involved in the battle against CSG, and have told Santos they do not want their country sacrificed for a coal seam gas field.

3. Farmers and other local community reject the project.

Extensive community surveys have shown an average of 96% opposition to CSG. This stretches across a massive 3.2 million hectares of country surrounding the Pilliga forest, including 99 communities. Hundreds of farmers have participated in protest actions unlike any previously seen in the region.

4. The Narrabri Gas Project has a long history of spills and leaks of toxic CSG water--Santos cannot be trusted to manage the project safely.

Santos has already contaminated a freshwater aquifer in the Pilliga with uranium at levels 20 times higher than safe drinking water guidelines, as well as lead, aluminium, arsenic and barium². In addition, there have been over 20 reported spills and leaks of toxic CSG water from storage ponds, pipes and well heads. Santos cannot be trusted.

5. The Pilliga is a haven for threatened wildlife.

The Pilliga is one of 15 nationally listed `biodiversity hotspots' and is vital to the survival of threatened species like the Koala, Spotted-tailed Quoll, Black-striped Wallaby, Eastern Pygmy-possum, Pilliga Mouse and South-eastern Long-eared Bat. The forest is home to over 200 bird species and is internationally recognised as an Important Bird Area². The Santos gasfield would fragment 95,000 hectares of the Pilliga with well pads, roads, and water and gas pipelines--damaging vital habitat and threatening the survival of endangered species.

6. Coal seam gas fuels dangerous climate change.

Methane is by far the major component of natural gas, and is a greenhouse gas 72 times more powerful than CO². CSG fields contribute to climate change through the leakage of methane during the production, transport, processing and use of coal seam gas.

7. Human health is compromised by coal seam gas.

A range of hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds can be released into the air from coal seam gas operations, including flaring of gas wells. The effects of volatile organic compounds vary, but can cause eye, nose and airway irritation, headache, nausea, dizziness and loss of coordination⁴. These impacts have been documented in human populations nearby to existing gasfields in Queensland, Sydney and in America.

8. The nation's premier optical astronomical observatory is at risk.

The Siding Springs Observatory, situated in the Warrumbungles and adjacent to the Pilliga, is under threat from the Narrabri Gas Project due to light and dust pollution⁵. The area has been internationally recognised as a `dark sky park'⁶ and the 50m high gas flares proposed by Santos threaten the viability of the facility.

9. Thousands of tonnes of salt waste will result from the project.

Santos has no solution for disposing of the hundreds of thousands of tonnes of salt that will be produced. Between 17,000 and 42,000 tonnes of salt waste would be produced each year. This industry would leave a toxic legacy in NSW.

10. Risk of fires would increase throughout the Pilliga's tinder-box conditions.

Methane flare stacks up to 50m high would be running day and night, even on total fire ban days. The Pilliga is prone to severe bushfires. The project would increase ignition sources as well as extracting, transporting and storing a highly flammable gas right within this extremely fire-prone forest.
Name Withheld
Object
Whitfield , Queensland
Message
1. The Narrabri Gas Project risks precious water sources, including the Great Australian Basin--Australia's largest groundwater aquifer
The Narrabri gasfield poses a real risk to our two most precious water resources: the Great Artesian Basin and the Murray-Darling Basin. The area of the Great Artesian Basin with the highest recharge rates is almost entirely contained within the Pilliga East forest. In a worst-case scenario, the water removed for CSG extraction could reduce water pressure in the recharge areas--potentially stopping the free flow of waters to the surface at springs and bores across the whole Great Artesian Basin.¹

Creeks in the Pilliga run into the Namoi River--a part of the Murray Darling Basin. This system is vulnerable to contamination from drilling fluid spills and the salty treated water produced from the proposed 850 wells.

2. The Gamilaraay Traditional Custodians are opposed
There are hundreds of cultural sites as well as songlines and stories connecting the Gamilaraay to the forest and to the groundwater beneath. Gamilaraay people are deeply involved in the battle against CSG, and have told Santos they do not want their country sacrificed for a coal seam gas field.

3. Farmers and other local community reject the project
Extensive community surveys have shown an average of 96% opposition to CSG. This stretches across a massive 3.2 million hectares of country surrounding the Pilliga forest, including 99 communities. Hundreds of farmers have participated in protest actions unlike any previously seen in the region.

4. The Narrabri Gas Project has a long history of spills and leaks of toxic CSG water--Santos cannot be trusted to manage the project safely
Santos has already contaminated a freshwater aquifer in the Pilliga with uranium at levels 20 times higher than safe drinking water guidelines, as well as lead, aluminium, arsenic and barium². In addition, there have been over 20 reported spills and leaks of toxic CSG water from storage ponds, pipes and well heads. Santos cannot be trusted.

5. The Pilliga is a haven for threatened wildlife
The Pilliga is one of 15 nationally listed `biodiversity hotspots' and is vital to the survival of threatened species like the Koala, Spotted-tailed Quoll, Black-striped Wallaby, Eastern Pygmy-possum, Pilliga Mouse and South-eastern Long-eared Bat. The forest is home to over 200 bird species and is internationally recognised as an Important Bird Area². The Santos gasfield would fragment 95,000 hectares of the Pilliga with well pads, roads, and water and gas pipelines--damaging vital habitat and threatening the survival of endangered species.

6. Coal seam gas fuels dangerous climate change
Methane is by far the major component of natural gas, and is a greenhouse gas 72 times more powerful than CO². CSG fields contribute to climate change through the leakage of methane during the production, transport, processing and use of coal seam gas.

7. Human health is compromised by coal seam gas
A range of hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds can be released into the air from coal seam gas operations, including flaring of gas wells. The effects of volatile organic compounds vary, but can cause eye, nose and airway irritation, headache, nausea, dizziness and loss of coordination⁴. These impacts have been documented in human populations nearby to existing gasfields in Queensland, Sydney and in America.

8. The nation's premier optical astronomical observatory is at risk
The Siding Springs Observatory, situated in the Warrumbungles and adjacent to the Pilliga, is under threat from the Narrabri Gas Project due to light and dust pollution⁵. The area has been internationally recognised as a `dark sky park'⁶ and the 50m high gas flares proposed by Santos threaten the viability of the facility.

9. Thousands of tonnes of salt waste will result from the project
Santos has no solution for disposing of the hundreds of thousands of tonnes of salt that will be produced. Between 17,000 and 42,000 tonnes of salt waste would be produced each year. This industry would leave a toxic legacy in NSW.

10. Risk of fires would increase throughout the Pilliga's tinder-box conditions
Methane flare stacks up to 50m high would be running day and night, even on total fire ban days. The Pilliga is prone to severe bushfires. The project would increase ignition sources as well as extracting, transporting and storing a highly flammable gas right within this extremely fire-prone forest.
Prue Grieve
Object
St Kilda East , Victoria
Message
I stand with the local community in the Pilliga Forest in sincere opposition to Coal Seam Gas extraction in that area.
There is evidence enough to demonstrate that harm is caused to the environment by this process.
Australia is well supplied with gas...enough to export a-plenty.
Preserve the natural forest for the benefit of all Australians.

Yours Faithfully
Prue Grieve
Joseph Earl
Object
Oxford Falls , New South Wales
Message
My son recently completed a thesis on the flow of water underground. I was astonished about how little is known about underground water flows and the fact that we currently have no means to predict where, when and how water flows underground.
I strongly object to the Narrabri gas project as we currently have no way of knowing how it will affect underground aquifers.
There should be no more projects like this allowed unless we can definitively prove that it will not have long term negative impacts.
Name Withheld
Object
Donvale , Victoria
Message
I do not agree with the environmental effects in the local and surrounding areas. I also have family living in NSW.
Name Withheld
Object
Ashfield , New South Wales
Message
The Santos CSG proposal for the Pilliga is of benefit to nobody except for Santos. The already-demonstrated damage to the water table should be sufficient in itself to have the project halted. It is amusing in a twisted kind of way that the material above refers to the "produced water"; the more correct term would be "poisoned water". The permanent damage to the forest and to the water table, to farms and populations for quite some distance, will be very long-term if not permanent, whereas the benefit is going to be short-term (20 years maximum), almost no benefit will adhere to the region, much less the district, minimal income will come to the state or the country for permanently taking away OUR resource, and the corporation will roll on in pursuit of its next victim. And all this is in response to a spurious "gas shortage". We alone of gas-producing nations export it all. We are so generous! Best practice would reserve a significant proportion at set price for our use. If this is approved the government which approves it will be guilty of fundamental disloyalty to the people it supposedly represents.
Jerome Pearce
Object
St Andrews , Victoria
Message
The science is clear. There are alternate forms of energy production that we must move to in order to protect the planet for future generations.
The science is also clear on the effects of CSG on ground water and habitat.
Richelle Donohue
Object
Stapylton , Queensland
Message
The Narrabri gasfield poses a real risk to our two most precious water resources: the Great Artesian Basin and the Murray-Darling Basin. The area of the Great Artesian Basin with the highest recharge rates is almost entirely contained within the Pilliga East forest. In a worst-case scenario, the water removed for CSG extraction could reduce water pressure in the recharge areas--potentially stopping the free flow of waters to the surface at springs and bores across the whole Great Artesian Basin.¹

Creeks in the Pilliga run into the Namoi River--a part of the Murray Darling Basin. This system is vulnerable to contamination from drilling fluid spills and the salty treated water produced from the proposed 850 wells. The damaged caused by these types of gas fields have already occured in other parts of Australia and overseas, and the companies then just close up shop and leave it to the government to clean up.

We live in the driest continent in the world and to think of damaging our ability to access water from the Great Artesian Basin begs belief.
Sophie McGrath
Object
Koah , Queensland
Message
Let us look to renewable resources rather than coal and gas and progressively develop in this way.

The use of non renewable energies is outdated, and it is destroying our planet, it is not progressive or the way logical way forward.

Please stop destroying our lands, our forests, our water... you can find both profits and energy without destruction.

This is truly the progressive way forward for our generation, the next generations and our planet.

Pagination

Subscribe to