I strongly object to the Powerhouse Parramatta Project.
I declare that I have not made any political donations.
The Powerhouse Museum should remain where it is in Sydney for all to enjoy. Tourists will not travel to Parramatta to visit the Museum. The cost of 1.5 million dollars to the Berejiklian Government is absolutely ludicrous for this project.
The demolition of heritage buildings is disgraceful. Parramatta needs to keep the beautiful Victorian era Italianate Willow Grove and St George Terraces in order to keep their sense of place.
The Powerhouse Museum's proposed site is on a river that is known to flood!
Please listen to the objections and do not let this controversial project go ahead.

Yours Sincerely
Leonie Van der Meer

Dear Sir,
I, like hundreds of others, object to this "vandalism" which the NSW government is determined to go ahead with and demolish a beautiful and dignified 19th Century property Willowgrove in Parramatta for the sake of erecting an inferior and smaller fake museum instead of leaving the Power House Museum where it is at present - Ultimo.
In your heart of hearts, you and the rest of the NSW government know that what you are doing is wrong and you also know that developers are out to demolish even the Pyramids of Egypt if they could just for a few coins of silver.
Leave things as they are, Sydney already has I am for sale reputation, so please leave alone whatever bit of dignity still remains in this city which belongs to the people and not the government to toy with it when it's running short of funds.

Greetings,

My name is Benedict Kennedy-Cox, a proud GWS resident and, emphatically, I object to the Powerhouse Parramatta Project.

I am aware you a professional doing you job and I respect that. Additionally, I respect the perspective and knowledge you would have on the situation, I would like to share mine with you.

My reasons for objecting to the Powerhouse Parramatta Project are as follows:
1. Loss of the heritage sites Willow Grove Villa and St Georges Terraces. They are of significant cultural heritage to the recent inhabitants of Parramatta.
2. The $1.2 billion price tag and loss of educational resources involved in relocating the Powerhouse museum are disappointing considering it can not even be called a museum when it is moved.
The bill for the taxpayers is too high for the loss of the knowledge from the Powerhouse Museum that cannot be transferred to the new site and certainly not worth the loss of the heritage-listed sites.

Kind regards,
Benedict Kennedy-Cox

Dear Sir,

I object to the Powerhouse Parramatta project. I object to the proposed demolition of the property, Willow Grove and other heritage properties of Parramatta in order to make way for the proposed construction of new Powerhouse Museum and other facilities.

I have not made any reportable political donations and I'm not a member of, or aligned with, any political party.

I have been a regular visitor to the Parramatta business district more than 45 years having lived and worked in the area. I continue to visit the Parramatta business district regularly as part of my occupation. It is a sad fact that Parramatta has over the past several decades lost an enormous number of its significant historical buildings and homes. The historical properties currently marked for demolition in order to make way for the Powerhouse Parramatta Project should be retained. Willow Grove and St Georges Terraces are rare examples of architecture that no longer exist in Parramatta CBD and should be retained.

Yours faithfully,

Danny Bricknell

Sir,

I OBJECT to the Powerhouse Museum being relocated to Parramatta.

I OBJECT to the current world class Powerhouse Museum at Ultimo being closed and inaccessible to the community. It is within easy access for the community from the whole of the State as it is located near the Sydney CBD with transport links. As not all the citizens in New South Wales live in Western Sydney, the current Powerhouse Museum serves the citizens.
The Government speaks of using community transport, but non Western Sydney citizens would have to travel to Central Railway Station change their mode of transport and then travel another 30 mins approximately to Parramatta Railway Station and then onto the proposed Museum. I for one would certainly not spend 2-3 hours travel time each way to access a Museum by public transport.

I OBJECT to the proposal as it will be constructed on a known floodplain. Who would construct a building on a known floodplain?

I OBJECT to the 1870s Willow Grove and 1880s St Georges Terrace being demolished. Parramatta's heritage being again destroyed. These are state and local heritage significant sites. With the construction of the light rail throughout Parramatta, the Government has destroyed the Royal Oak Hotel, destroyed the ambiance of The Female Factory site by having the light rail route through the site.

I OBJECT to there being no permanent displays in the museum. This is what a Museum is : permanent displays of our heritage, culture and lifestyle.

I OBJECT to there being no significant storage areas on the site. Even if there is to be basement storage areas, concerns about the building being water-tight need to be addressed.

DO WE NEED more coffee shops and temporary display spaces? NO, we don't as there are plenty of refreshment shops/cafes in Parramatta, particularly in Church Street.

INSTEAD of funding and potential blowout in the proposed budget for a new Museum,
THE FUNDING SHOULD BE SPENT ON RESTORATION OF THE ROXY THEATRE which will provide the community of Western Sydney with a potential 2000 seat world class theatre and permanent performance space.

I object to the Powerhouse Parramatta on the following grounds:
• That the total building size of the proposed Parramatta Powerhouse at 24,830 sqm will be only 58% of the existing Ultimo Powerhouse. Furthermore, the spatial analysis in the EIS architectural plans shows the total Presentation Space is just 12,644sqm1.
• That an estimated $1 billion or more will be spent to close the existing Powerhouse Museum, build a new facility and then have a building that is vastly inferior to the current Powerhouse Museum.
• That without adequate exhibition space, a significant number of the current exhibits will not be displayed.
• That a facility forecast to host 2 million visitors a year has no provision for car parking spaces.
• That the relocation of the Powerhouse would be to a site known to flood, such as in August 1986 and 10 February 2020.
• That working steam engines in the current Powerhouse will in future become only static displays.
• That former trustee of the Powerhouse Museum, Leo Schofield, describes it as, “one of the most shameful acts of cultural vandalism in the history of this country.”2
• That the 1870s-built Italianate villa, WillowGrove, considered to be worthy of heritage listing, would be demolished. This would be the loss of a unique building and a further loss of connection with Parramatta’s history.
On economic, cultural and common-sense grounds, I would ask that the NSW government re-consider the viability of the proposal for the Powerhouse Parramatta.