Dear Planning & Environment,

I would like to object to the distance of only 6 metres to the boundry
fence for buildings B1.1, B1.2 and B2. This distance is to close to
buidings on the otherside of the boundry, especially for a 5 storey
buiding.

Regards,

Em

5. It seems all buildings are very close to neighbouring buildings, are
they non-compliant with setback rules? The most important questions
are how they can both remove endangered trees and build even closer to
neighbors simultaneously?

6. The consultation period is rather tight, because it's holiday. I
can't even have enough time to discuss thoroughly with my friends who
are planning and development background. I think the process is a mess
and bad one.

7. What social infrastructure would be provided by Ivanhoe to the
whole area, especially along Herring Road? It doesn't make sense just
provide infrastructure and facilities into their own site, they should
benefit the whole Herring Road area / Macquarie Park Priority Precinct
and the whole area.

1. As Ivanhoe is a hugely significant development affecting the whole
area, I'm not sure if the notification letters were distributed to all
residents and land owners in the surrounding area, not only Herring
Road Precinct, but the whole Macquarie park Priority Precinct as well.
2. Both the intersection of Herring Road of Epping Road and the
Herring Road are largely congested. Also the potential signalising of
the intersections would be even worse by causing more waiting time. We
don't think any measures could alleviate the increasingly traffic
congestion along Herring Road, but Ivanhoe is adding more traffic
flow.
In addition, it should not only consider the Ivanhoe itself,
consenting authorities should take into all Herring Road's (all even
whole Macquarie Park's) future development into consideration and
analysis as a whole, because we are the end user of this area and we
can't object on project by project.
The fact is that we already realized that sites were sold and being
sold by various agents which could potentially provide 1000+ units,
how come Land and Housing Corporation as a Government simply thinks on
behalf of himself, instead of investigating all surrounding area's
existing and potential traffic congestion?
Ivanhoe's developers and consenting authorities should take into
account of all future Herring Road's development sites into analysis,
it seems that the Herring Road are the only access in and out of their
projects which will be killing us residents.
3.We see the advantage of the whole area as having so many nice big
and tall endangered trees, but very unfortunately, it seems they will
remove almost all of them. This is a rural tranquil area, but the
developer is turning it into an urban centre. We think it will break
up the endangered forest community.
4.Seems the street parking will be eliminated during construction
period, where I usually park there.
5.Seems buildings are very close to neighboring buildings, can they
remove endangered trees and break setback and privacy rules
simultaneously?

Dear Planning and Environment NSW,

I would like to object the proximity of sites B 1.1, B 1.2, B2 to lots
1, 3, 5 and 7 Peach Tree Road; only 6 metres in some sections to a
forty five metre building.

There should be more open space in between the sites.

Kind regards,

Duncan Tomlinson

too high

Too close to my unit

I believe the transitions between the public areas and lots 3, 5 and 7
Peach tree road are too close. There should be more green areas as a
transition. The pool is also too close to the boundary. I also have
concerns of privacy of the highschool overlooking the residential
area. Please consider that GFAs and height controls of the adjoining
lots are the lowest in the area

No clear information on heght controls and if the project complies to
the height restrictions in the area.

Regards,

I object to this proposal. It is not in my best interested for this
project to be built just 6 meters from the current back fence of our
block.
Go build somewhere else

My concern is that the proposed Ivanhoe building is only setback 6 to 10
meters from the 1 Peach Tree Road property line but should be at least
12 meters from the property line. The Ivanhoe buildings should be set
back further to allow for future development of Peach Tree Road. The
proposal has the orientation of the buildings along the eastern
boundary which will result in a loss of privacy, resulting in further
restrictions to future Peach tree Road development.

Proposed building of the Ivanhoe property along the property boundary
and the orientation of the buildings should be reconsidered to protect
the amenity of the residents on Peach Tree Road.

Thank you in advance.

i object