I strongly oppose the Concrete facility on Glebe Island as it kills long
term planning for one of the last development areas in the Heart of
the City. White Bay / Glebe Island should be used to add value to our
city in a sustainable way. A concrete facility does generate cement
dust which is toxic and does affect humans. There is no room for such
an industry in the heart of the city, not around dense population.
nobody wants to live beside a concrete manufacturing facility. The
Cruise Ship terminal is bad enough and evicently affecting health of
the residents, this is a similar issue.

I am writing to object to the 24/7 nature of the concrete batching
facility proposed to be built at Glebe Island. As a working port I
have no objection to the facility being built but cannot see the need
for it to operate 24/7. The building sites requiring the concrete will
not be operation 24/7 and the location of this site is in close
proximity to multiple dwellings. The operation of the plant 24/7 will
severely impact on the lives of many residents in an area the state
government targeted for development.

I object to the above development because:
1 .a very noticeable increase in noise from trucks and ships
(motors will run 24 h day and night.
2. a major increase in dangerous exhaust air pollution from ships and
trucks
3. increase in bay water pollution
4. onsite night lighting disturbs our sleep
5. the increase in traffic in the waterways by heavy industrial
vessels may result in safety issues for the recreational boats like
kayaking, dragon boats,rowing boats, small sailing ships.
6. health issues for all people breathing in contaminated air day
and night (specially the elderly, asthma sufferer)

I object to this submission. I live within a couple of hundred metres of
the proposed site, and my child's school (amongst others) is also
nearby. I am concerned about noise and particle pollution and the
effects on our sleep, concentration levels, respiratory function, and
potential long term health effects. It is too close to residential
areas, it should be moved to a less populated area (e.g. ports area).

We are object this DA because we live opposite this Glebe site and our
community--Jacksons Landing will be heavily impact by the noise, dust,
and also with visual impact. It's not not appropriate to consider this
site as concrete batching facility, hope government can consider
another better option. Thanks for your attention.

We are object this DA because we live opposite this Glebe site and our
community--Jacksons Landing will be heavily impact by the noise, dust,
and also with visual impact. It's not not appropriate to consider this
site as concrete batching facility, hope government can consider
another better option. Thanks for your attention.

We are object this DA because we live opposite this Glebe site and our
community--Jacksons Landing will be heavily impact by the noise, dust,
and also with visual impact. It's not not appropriate to consider this
site as concrete batching facility, hope government can consider
another better option. Thanks for your attention.

We are object this DA because we live opposite this Glebe site and our
community--Jacksons Landing will be heavily impact by the noise, dust,
and also with visual impact. It's not not appropriate to consider this
site as concrete batching facility, hope government can consider
another better option. Thanks for your attention.

I support Hanson's Glebe Island concrete plant for the following reasons:
- The Glebe concrete plant will allow Hanson to continue its supply of
concrete after the closure of the Blackwattle Bay concrete plant
- Aggregates can be delivered by ship from the Hanson Bass Point
Quarry which will minimise tipper truck movements

I support this project - the facility will be vital to supply concrete to
the upcoming infrastructure projects and developments for Sydney. Use
of marine transport will reduce truck movements. This project will
also be in keeping with the history of Sydney Harbour being a working
Port.