Skip to main content
neil schafer
Object
CREMORNE , New South Wales
Message
I object to:
1. Demolition of a dwelling in a Heritage Conservation area Zoned R2 and subsequent change in zoning to
Education
2. The scale of bulk of the proposed development is out of character with the local area and will adversely
affect the character of Roseville and in particular the Roseville Conservation Area
3. The increased noise and volume of traffic during and after construction
Danielle Stephenson
Object
CAMMERAY , New South Wales
Message
Due to the proximity of this project to many houses, especially the house directly adjacent, this project not only impedes vision and privacy but will make living in their home a living nightmare. The windows of the next door house will be directly in line with windows of girls and teachers looking in.
Name Withheld
Object
WILLOUGHBY , New South Wales
Message
I object to this development on the following grounds:
1. Demolition of a building in a Heritage Conservation area zoned R2 and subsequent change in zoning to Education
2. The scale of bulk of the proposed development is out of character with the local area and will adversely affect the character of Roseville and in particular the Roseville Conservation Area
3. The increased noise and volume of traffic during and after the construction

I think it would be reckless to approve rezoning of a Heritage Conservation area. With our ever increasing hot days and climate change we need more of these zones not less. It would be a dangerous precedent and not acceptable.

I am also a user of the existing Roseville College swimming pool and its is a lovely outdoor pool with natural light and airflow which is quite unique in the area. It should be preserved.

I object strongly to this development proposal.
Name Withheld
Object
RED HILL , Queensland
Message
I object this submission
Name Withheld
Object
KILLARA , New South Wales
Message
The proposed changes are unnecessary and will lead to unforeseen chaos around the area for local residents, parents, staff and the community as a whole. The current facilities are more than adequate. I object to the plans for this centre as they far too drastic and do not consider the consequences of such a development.
Name Withheld
Object
ROSEVILLE , New South Wales
Message
There will be a significantly increased noise and volume of traffic in my local area during and after the project. The scale of bulk of the proposed development is out of character with my local area and will adversely affect the character of Roseville and in particular the Roseville conservation area. Moreover, a dwelling in a Heritage Conservation area Zoned R2 and subsequent change in zoning to education will occur.
Jacqueline Hayes
Object
ROSEVILLE , New South Wales
Message
I object to the development application, with particular regard to:
1. Demolition of a dwelling in a Heritage Conservation area zoned R2 and subsequent change in zoning to Education
2. The scale of the bulk of the proposed development is (completely) out of area with the local area and will adversely affect the character of Roseville and in particular the Roseville Conservation Area
3. The increased noise and volume of traffic during and after construction.
The area around Roseville College, and specifically Bancroft, Glencroft and Wandella Avenues comprises narrow residential streets. Construction of a multi-level building will detrimentally affect traffic flow, noise level and importantly the safety of residents. The residential area is not equipped to cope with the size of such a project nor support its ongoing maintenance.
Bert Oosterhoff
Object
ROSEVILLE , New South Wales
Message
I wish to object to this project on the basis of its size and that there will be an additional heritage area building demolished for it to be built.
The eastern wall of the proposed project will tower above the residence at 39 Bancroft Avenue and be totally out of character with this area.
Also the additional traffic that will use Victoria Avenue and Recreation Avenue will severely impact on the traffic using Hill Street. During the morning peak (8am to 9:30am) it takes several minutes for the parents to access Chatswood CBD due to the turning restriction at Wandella Avenue and all along Boundary Street. At present,during that time, it can take up to 15 minutes to make a left hand turn from Hill Street to Boundary Street and then right into Archer Street.
Name Withheld
Object
NORTHWOOD , New South Wales
Message
This project will result in the demolition of a house in a Heritage Conservation Area area zoned R2 which is completely unacceptable. Furthermore, this development is of great disadvantage to the residents of Roseville and only seeks to benefit those who attend the school. For example, the increased noise to the area will be of great disadvantage to the residents and will also increase traffic in the area. The size of the project is also uncharacteristic of the local Roseville area and thus adversely impact the character of Roseville. This project also seems not to consider the effect on the residents immediately adjacent to the centre, such as lack of privacy, sunlight and the impact of construction on local wildlife.
Stuart Sneyd
Object
ROSEVILLE , New South Wales
Message
I strongly object to the proposed development on the following grounds:

1) The proposal includes demolition of the dwelling 37 Bancroft Ave which is in a Heritage Conservation Area and zoned R2. The demolition of this property would see an unequal and unfair application of zoning and development laws as many residents immediately adjacent to the school have had severe restrictions placed on their own modest renovations and alterations to their properties.

2) The scale and bulk of the proposed development is in severe conflict in with the current character of the Heritage Conservation Area. The intent of the Heritage Conservation Area will adversely diminished with a detrimental affect to the character of the Roseville Heritage conservation area as a currently cohesive precinct of cultural significance.

3) The increase in noise, traffic volume and disruption arising from the major scale of the work deprives the local residents their right to enjoyment of the suburb especially as Heritage Conservation Area. The proposal will see an increase in traffic that is already approaching gridlock daily and is at a dangerous volume with no systematic traffic management in place and the school having no accountability for the problems associated with the volume. The Heritage Conservation Area is not designed as a high traffic area and the proposal will only make this situation worse.

In summary the proposal is a clear abuse of the spirit and the intent of the Heritage Conservation Area which should be equally applied to all residents of Roseville including local Business.

Pagination

Subscribe to