1. the buildings will block the views of my property on level 20 of 183 kent st. I purchased the unit on the basis that the planned development at that time was less than 2 floors in front of my building, and now my place will be substantially diminished in value.

2. I object to the fact that the developers don't give Australians a fair chance to purchase the property on our own shores - they sell all the good property offshore and we are left with the rubbish. the government needs to crack down on this.

3. there is not enough infrastructure in the area

The three new buildings on Barangaroo South already overcrowd the area and by their black ugliness, cast a blight on the neighbourhood.

The proposal to develop three more even bigger buildings next door fills me with despair. Rapacity has become the guiding principle of Sydney's developers, hand in hand with the Government which proclaims it is 'Open for Business'. Never a truer slogan.

This proposed barrier of buildings, adjacent to the harbourside, will destroy what remains of the view from the water in this precinct and the view of Sydney and it's suburbs from the water is what all tourists want to see. It will also destroy the views of the neighbourhood to its east which had been part of the low rise protocols developed by an environmentally sensitive council.

The overcrowding of the site which will be vastly increased if such a development goes ahead would be breathtaking,. The pedestrian and vehicular traffic generated would clog such a restricted site.

I can see no justification for the spoliation of this waterside site except the generation of profit. It is sad for Sydney that such people are in charge.

While the building, above, may be in accord with the approved plan, it is not in accord with the URBAN environment of Darling Harbour and the City. The successful buildings in the Barangaroo / King Street Wharf Area are those built in accordance with the original architectural competition winner which foresaw buildings of about 6-8 storeys. The front rank of buildings in Barangaroo / King Street Wharf are in accordance with this concept and provide a pleasant environment for the foreshore. The second rank of buildings is up to 70 storeys and effect a crippling load on the environment of Darling Harbour and the City.

As per my original submission regarding the development of the Coraki quarry. I have concerns regarding the condition of the Woodburn-Coraki Road. The road is in poor condition with numerous uneven surfaces and potholes, the increase in truck movements will make this worse.
One of our cars has on two occasions been impacted by loose rock from trucks, increased movements may result in increased vehicle damage.
Noise from current truck movements has impacted on our quality of life, this will only diminish further.
If we are required to work through the night it is difficult to get reasonable rest due to noise and vibration from heavy vehicle movements past the house.

There is a huge privacy concern now that there are southern facing windows on the Western tower. These windows will look directly into the north-western apartments of the Deicota building located at 157 Redfern Street. The original plans did not have any southern facing windows and these revised plans have many bedroom, living room and kitchen windows staring straight into the bedrooms and living rooms of the Deicota building.

The modification request to put windows on the southern side of the western tower must be denied. As a minimum, a condition should be imposed requiring the windows to be frosted glass. Louvers are not enough to ensure privacy between residence in the opposing buildings.

1. Do not agree to the median strip. This will impact all house residents along all Streets of Rooty Hill South RD.
2. Traffic light will cause major traffic blocking up on the main inter section of great western highway. As Cars are travelling in high speed from 70km to 60km to 40km in school hours.
3. liquor store - not agree near school.

Regarding the relocation of visitor bike parking to the public domain:
No, this should not be allowed to happen.
Public land is for the benefit of the public - not commercial interests. It's not rocket science.
The amount of public space at Darling Harbour has already been reduced by recent and ongoing developments, and needs to stop.
If this request is approved, it will go against the purpose and necessity of Darling Harbour as a PUBLIC SPACE. Where will it end??

I believe that storing asbestos at the site is unfair to a community that has had enough carcinogenic waste to deal with for decades.
Is there a guarantee that this facility would not become a storage facility for asbestos waste from greater Sydney and beyond?
The tornado last December proved how susceptible our little suburb is to the industries we are surrounded by and the damage they an cause. If a severe storm where to damage this cell, or trucks on the road, or the immediate vicinity of the site Kurnell residents could be severely impacted.
Asbestos contamination would deem our homes unlivable, aside from the horrific health implications and loss of value in our properties.
Just for once could council, our government and industry put the health and well being of the residents of Kurnell ahead of the needs of industry.

I believe that storing asbestos at the site is unfair to a community that has had enough carcinogenic waste to deal with for decades.
Is there a guarantee that this facility would not become a storage facility for asbestos waste from greater Sydney and beyond?
The tornado last December proved how susceptible our little suburb is to the industries we are surrounded by and the damage they an cause. If a severe storm where to damage this cell, or trucks on the road, or the immediate vicinity of the site Kurnell residents could be severely impacted.
Asbestos contamination would deem our homes unlivable, aside from the horrific health implications and loss of value in our properties.
Just for once could council, our government and industry put the health and well being of the residents of Kurnell ahead of the needs of industry.

I absolutely object to the further polluting of the area so close to my home and where my children are growing up, especially with such toxic material as asbestos. Asbestos kills! Go away Caltex! Do us a favour, dispose of your polluted soil in the proper means like everyone else and just build us a world class golf course and move on.. your time here has expired, find land away from waterways, marine life and humans. We put up with enough already, you've made Botany Bay one of the most dangerous places to live and I already fear what will happen if one day a terrorist decides to drop a bomb here. It will cripple our ports, no airport, no fuel, no transport. Give it up and just move on!