I object to the visual effects on the landscape, the possibility of soil erosion on all slopes, particularly those over 18% and the apparent disregard of the Senate Enquiry report on the health risks to neighbouring residents to turbines. I reserve the right to add further objections.

I strongly support the Rye Park Wind Farm project. Large scale renewable energy projects such as this wind farm are essential in the transition away from fossil fuels to renewable energy - which is required to happen quickly and efficiently if we are to avoid ongoing climate change.

Climate change has been described by leading medical bodies as the greatest health threat of the 21st century. It threatens the health and wellbeing of Australians, both current and future generations, and vulnerable populations around the world.

Wind farms are an ideal alternative to fossil fuels for energy generation, and also have the benefit of not harming the health of local communities. Fossil fuels have many documented harms to health including increases in cardiovascular disease, respiratory illness and cancer. In contrast, wind farms have no credible scientific evidence showing risks to the health of local communities.

I strongly support this project and look forward to many more projects such as this in Australia.

My Granma owns a property at Rye Park and I visit regularly.
I am upset that the Rye Park Wind Farm is even called a `farm' as there is nothing about these large machines that resembles farming.
I understand that a large amount of money is to be given to the company that owns this development and I cannot see why this money can't be given to the owners of all the houses in the Rye Park area so they can put solar panels on their roofs. I haven't done the maths but I reckon this could produce as much power as 109 turbines could, do it without destroying the Rye Park hills, and produce electricity 90% of the time instead of only 34% of the time.
I would never consider following in my grandparent's footsteps by owning property in the Rye Park area if this development goes ahead. I cannot see any future for a village that is surrounded by wind turbines.
Yours Sincerely,
Tristan Pollard

I object to this project application.
My family lives just north of Rye Park and in Boorowa. My husband, children and I are regular visitors to the farm, and to Boorowa, and we have always enjoyed the peacefulness of the area and the friendliness of the community. As I also grew up on the farm visits are always a pleasant escape from the city life I now live.
The proposed `wind farms' of Rugby, Rye Park and Bango have been a concern to my family for many years, but the Rye Park WF is of particular concern to me.
Living in the Goulburn area, and travelling through Crookwell or via the Hume Highway to visit my family, I have had regular encounters with the visual destruction of the landscape along the way. I can no longer visit my family without seeing wind turbines but can drive past and then they are gone. To think that my family will have to live with wind turbines for the rest of their lives, and not be able to just drive away, is a distressing thought. And to think of the destruction of those beautiful Rye Park hills that have been so caringly preserved over many generations is also distressing.
I have seen the building of the Gunning WF and the Gullen Range WF. The scouring of roads over the landscape, the blasting of the land to make massive holes and the building of towers and power lines that can be seen for many kilometres away.
I do not believe that the majority of the local residents of Rye Park and Boorowa would be in favour of this development. Any of the promotional material that I have seen for `wind farms' is of bare rolling hills or fields of pasture, and what I have seen of the Trustpower promotional material on their website is no different. Rye Park is not bare rolling hills or vast, expansive fields but is that what it will look like after construction?
I understand the Rye Park area is a haven for many rare or endangered birds, reptiles, plants and fish that have been quietly and lovingly guarded for a very long time. I have no doubt that much of this country would still be as our First Australians would have seen it. How can this proposal be considered in any way?
Katie Addison and Family

I Object to the Rye Park Road development as it will have significant negative visual impact on the property of my family, at Residence 50 at Blakney Creek.
I do not believe that the economic benefits outweight the environmental damage during constructions, nor the negative social impacts on the local community.
I do not believe that the wind farm technology is as effective as solar technology which could generate the same power over a smaller footprint.
I believe that conservation should be further encouraged for the greater good, rather than promoting the creation of more infrastructure, a great distance from the sites that demand the energy needs.
I do not believe that wind farms should be constructed anywhere.

As a resident in the Bannister area I live amongst the Gullen Range Wind Farm. I love seeing the turbines in action creating power from the wind and constantly think to myself what a great idea. As I also think about the alternatives I would much rather have turbines next to my place than a coal mine. I would like to support the Rye Park Windfarm on behalf of the silent majority that support wind power generation. There is a definite vocal opposition to windfarms in Australia and in our local area and their views are respected and warranted however there are a lot more people both locally and generally who support these projects or aren't too fussed about them. I wanted to make a submission to the powers that be on behalf of this silent majority. Regardless of the local financial benefits wind power brings to a community, I believe wind to be a much better power source than the traditional alternatives.

I object to this wind farm on the grounds that it will affect too many neighbouring non-hosting households.
As a family currently living within close proximity of a wind farm, and not having a say to its development and now having another new wind farm proposed for an adjoining property we understand the difficulty in making people understand the problems associated with wind farms.
Noise and visual aspects, as well as environmental concerns and the inability to sell an affected property are all points of concern and should be considered before any new wind farms are approved.
The developers may have reduced the number of wind turbines and changed some aspects of the application regarding the location of turbines and the access tracks etc. but will these changes be added to the next modification.

To whom it may concern

This letter is regarding the proposed Rye Park Wind farm.
My main concern for this wind farm is that it may affect mine and my families' health in the
future.
Another concern I have is, as I am only a P plater (provisional 1 licence holder) I am worried about the impact these turbines will have on traffic, as there will be a lot more vehicles and no doubt big trucks on our roads during their construction. This traffic will affect the road and we do not need that, as our road is already crap enough!
If these turbines do go ahead we will be able to see them from every angle of our house
and it will be taking away what is already a beautiful sight.
I certainly hope they don't go ahead!

I have been a resident in the Rye Park district all my life and I can honestly say that there has never been a proposal that has concerned me more, than the development of the Rye Park Wind Farm. I reside on the Rye Park-Dalton Rd, approximately 3kms from some of the turbines themselves. Living on the land and being wool producers is not only a form of income for us but also a lifestyle choice for my family and generations before me. I am concerned the proposed wind farms are going to have a major impact on the valuation of our land and therefore affect our retirement in the future.
Another point that concerns me is the health implications that may be associated with the turbines. There are so many `stories' as to the impact the turbines have on health and lifestyle, that I don't think there is enough evidence out there to ensure that there will be no impact at all. This concerns me greatly, not only for myself but also my family and friends. How can it be said there will be no problems, when there have been many reported problems.
There are so many people in neighbouring towns that wonder what we are complaining about and that we should be pleased there is a greener source of energy being generated. All well and good for them to say that when the only time they will see or hear them is when they come to visit...not having to see them whenever they look through their kitchen window (or lounge room window if the Bango Wind Farm goes ahead too). That is what we are facing - every corner of our farm being in view of turbines!
The Rye Park wind farm is located amongst an area that is actually quite highly populated, with many residents living within 2-3km of the turbines. Many of the proponents have `land' in the area, but don't actually `live' there, leaving the existing residents having to put up with them instead. Is that not something that that Department of Planning & Environment is concerned about? If not, it should be.
Surely Australia, being such a vast area, has many other options of non-populated land that could be used just as easily, without impacting on so many people's lives.
I do wonder how these wind farms are so financially viable, when the Government is having to invest so much money into them. Surely health and education should be where any surplus money is going to protect the most important assets we have - our children...the future!

To whom it should concern,
I am writing this submission opposing the Rye Park wind farm, number SSD6693.
As a 5th generation grazier living within the area of the proposed wind farm, it gravely concerns me how this industrial factory will impact on me and my family.
Our farm is situated 3km west of the Rye Park factory of 109 turbines (reduced from 126) and 3km east of the Bango factory (approx. 122 turbines). I do wonder whether this situation exists anywhere else in the world, where our Federal, State and Local Governments are willing to subject their voters and rate payers to this accumulative amount of visual and infrasound saturation.
While we are talking about Local Government, as you would no doubt be aware, the Local Councils of Boorowa, Harden and Young are now amalgamated. I would like to know how this proposal from Trustpower can even be considered now, knowing that Young Council had rejected any wind factories in their jurisdiction, as well as having no actual councilors representing rate payers at the moment.
It also concerns me why Trustpower feels it is necessary to offer neighbouring properties (within 2kms of the turbines) $2,500 - $5,000 compensation, as well as having a clause in the contract that requires them to keep quiet about any negative issues that may be a result of the turbines. WouldnÂ't this be termed as Â`hush moneyÂ' elsewhere? Is this money being offered because Trustpower themselves are concerned about the impact the turbines will have on our community, which it doesnÂ't want the general public to know about?
I do hope NSW Planning & Environment starts to consider the number of submissions that are opposed to these factories and think about the majority NOT the minority of the residents LIVING in the area that will be directly impacted by this proposal.