Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Casula
,
New South Wales
Message
See attached
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Paul van den Bos
Object
Paul van den Bos
Object
Chipping Norton
,
New South Wales
Message
We believe that this development is wrong. We believe that the NSW Department of Planning made a big mistake in recommending this development.
We have provided proof that the decision was based on wrong and misleading information.
We have provided proof that the decision was based on wrong and misleading information.
Attachments
Tracey McDonald
Object
Tracey McDonald
Object
Wattle Grove
,
New South Wales
Message
The concerns and health of the local community and our local council have only been given lip service by the proponent. They constantly dismiss the concerns of residents and minimise the negative impacts of this development while never the substance of the concerns people address and overstating its potential benefits.
The Moorebank precinct is not the main area of need for the output of this development. The proponent's own documentation highlights this. It would be better to locate this development closer to the intended destination of the warehouses needing the containers which is the Eastern Creek area and further, towards the center of the intended catchment area.
Approving this development would place an unfair impact on the residents of Wattle Grove, Moorebank, Casula and surrounding areas. The terminal is recommended by the proponent for its positive outcomes for NSW but the terminal's many neighbouring residents would have to shoulder an unfair share of the state's traffic, pollution, degradation of the natural environment and the loss of nationally significant historical sites.
This development will turn the area around it into an industrial black hole, destroying all the hard work of our local government in developing Liverpool as a livable city with room for both development and a healthy family friendly lifestyle.
The proponents make a big deal that their development will ease traffic on the M5 between Botany and Moorebank. They also claim that those same trucks as they leave the Intermodal Terminal will not adversely impact the roads of Western Sydney. It is inconceivable that trucks that are causing great impact on the M5 in one area will have little or no impact in another. Residence have a right to expect honesty in the EIS.
Now that SIMTA is behind both projects it would be appropriate for them to resubmit their EIS with one comprehensive document that covers the impact and scale of the project on both sides of Moorebank Avenue.
The Moorebank precinct is not the main area of need for the output of this development. The proponent's own documentation highlights this. It would be better to locate this development closer to the intended destination of the warehouses needing the containers which is the Eastern Creek area and further, towards the center of the intended catchment area.
Approving this development would place an unfair impact on the residents of Wattle Grove, Moorebank, Casula and surrounding areas. The terminal is recommended by the proponent for its positive outcomes for NSW but the terminal's many neighbouring residents would have to shoulder an unfair share of the state's traffic, pollution, degradation of the natural environment and the loss of nationally significant historical sites.
This development will turn the area around it into an industrial black hole, destroying all the hard work of our local government in developing Liverpool as a livable city with room for both development and a healthy family friendly lifestyle.
The proponents make a big deal that their development will ease traffic on the M5 between Botany and Moorebank. They also claim that those same trucks as they leave the Intermodal Terminal will not adversely impact the roads of Western Sydney. It is inconceivable that trucks that are causing great impact on the M5 in one area will have little or no impact in another. Residence have a right to expect honesty in the EIS.
Now that SIMTA is behind both projects it would be appropriate for them to resubmit their EIS with one comprehensive document that covers the impact and scale of the project on both sides of Moorebank Avenue.
Attachments
Ned Ticic
Object
Ned Ticic
Object
Casula
,
New South Wales
Message
My issue as per the attached PDF is about the noise pollution associated with the freight liners on the nearby residents of Casula Links NSW 2170. Noise from freight trains on the SSFL as well as movements across the rivier to and from the MIC site. At this point there are NO NOISE WALLS/BARRIERS along the SSFL, despite houses located within 20m of the SSFL.
Also, the Noise Pollution to Casula residents coming off the M5 Georges River Bridge which is government owned ie. RMS. The only stretch of road on the entire orbital road network in Sydney Metro with no noise walls/barriers. The truck compression braking and constant traffic, which will only get worse between Hume Highway and Moorebank Avenue is a total disgrace. No noise testing and no noise monitoring from Liverpool Links and Casula Links has been undertaken. There are houses 50m from the bridge. Add to that the SSFL this is a nightmare. Noise Barriers on the M5 Bridge and SSFL are a necessity not an option.
Also, the Noise Pollution to Casula residents coming off the M5 Georges River Bridge which is government owned ie. RMS. The only stretch of road on the entire orbital road network in Sydney Metro with no noise walls/barriers. The truck compression braking and constant traffic, which will only get worse between Hume Highway and Moorebank Avenue is a total disgrace. No noise testing and no noise monitoring from Liverpool Links and Casula Links has been undertaken. There are houses 50m from the bridge. Add to that the SSFL this is a nightmare. Noise Barriers on the M5 Bridge and SSFL are a necessity not an option.