I’m an owner of 4 apartments at Peppers Kingscliff the property next door to the proposed development.

I am concerned with the proposal for the following reasons

1. Building height of 21m is excessive and will over shadow adjacent properties . It’s also not in compliance with the zoning for the property. There are no properties in the immediate area of that height.

2. The traffic flow into the area is by one main street that already services 3 resorts and locals that enjoy the Salt dining precinct. The development puts unnecessary pressure on the current very serene area. There is a lack of infrastructure including public open space and amenities to support a 5 storey development.

3. The area is predominantly a tourist area that attracts visitors all year around. Including a large residential development will be detrimental to the area attracting tourists as it will destroy the holiday/ recreational feel of the area. Kingscliff community and the Tweed council currently benefit greatly financially and this area is know as a premium destination for tourists.

4. Its likely the development will not assist with the residential housing lack of supply and the pricing will be well beyond affordable for most as can be seen from the developments at Casuarina with 2br units priced over $15m . It will be a situation where the units will be purchased as holiday homes and rented out as short stay accommodation/ Airbnb. Essentially exacerbating the current situation.

5. We support the previous proposal of low rise mix of houses and duplexes.

6. Any future development should blend in with the streetscape and character of the surrounding resorts. Beachside feel , low rise and not densely populated. We don’t want the area turning into a Gold Coast high rise style . If this is approved it sets a dangerous precedent for the area with a large risk of over pricing and high density development.

7. Government should adhere to the planning controls set by council for the site

I object to this development proposal because it impacts the whole status of the salt village scene.
Peppers & Mantra apartments have historically provided a scenic tourist venue set around park & beach setting with accompanying ocean or hinterland views.
Development that removes these views because of a height increase should NOT be considered.
I purchased my Mantra apartment knowing that council zoning restricted the height of adjoining development that may take away my hinterland views of Mt warning and block afternoon sunshine onto mine and other Manta apartment balconies.
The proposed increase in height on the existing zoning would block views and create a canyon effect between Mantra apartments and the proposed structure providing a wind tunnel effect.
Any structure over the existing three storey height would suffer significantly more from the aircraft flight path noise that plagues the Mantra apartments.
No increase in height standard should be allowed.

I support the proposed Stage 3 development at Bells Boulevard as a well-considered addition to Salt Village. The mixed-use approach will help strengthen the precinct by combining housing, local activity, and employment opportunities in one walkable location. Importantly, the inclusion of a range of dwelling types, including more affordable options, will help maintain diversity in the community. The way the building heights transition across the site also appears carefully designed to respond to the surrounding neighbourhood, creating a development that feels balanced, appropriate, and supportive of Kingscliff’s coastal character.

I am the owner of Lot 145 in the Class 3 residential apartment building located at 9 Gunnamatta Ave, Kingscliff (registered as Strata Plan 73905) known as Mantra on Salt Beach.

My objections to this project are as follows:

1. Height of the proposed building:
. I support enforcement of the current TSC 3 storey height planning policy, for the reasons set out in that policy document, an
a. The original DA consents of 23 April 2003 for the Salt Beach Precinct envisaged that the site in question could be developed for Class 2 residential apartments, with a 3-storey height limitation
b. The current views to the west of our Resort, Mantra on Salt Beach would be seriously impacted by adding two storeys to the current height limit of 3 storeys.
c. We do not want this 5 story building proposal to set a precedence for other future developments to encourage multistorey buildings. We do not want another Surfers Paradise here!

2. Parking. The proposed development should comply with the ‘retail’ parking issues raised in the Tweed Shire Council submission, as well as the parking over-flow implications for the ‘residential’ parking area owned by SP 73905

a. I think Tweed Shire Council’s estimated parking shortfall is way under estimated.

3. Enforcement Of Use Intent. Conditions should be added to any DA consent to give formal effect to the intent that the apartments would be used for normal residential purposes only and that there be a restriction placed on that intent to prohibit short term lettings such as Air BnB and Stayz holiday lettings. That should be done by requiring the Developer to place negative covenants on the title registration to prohibit short term residential accommodation. The intent is clear but would be unenforceable without the negative covenants. Higher Courts have always upheld Torrens title indefeasibility.

4. Completion Deadline. There should be a fixed deadline for completion of the Development because the derelict site has been an eye-sore for locals for over 20 years.

By way of general comment, I do not support the TSC objection to the proponent’s preference to construct a residential flat building (rather than shop-top housing). Both options are compatible with the basic planning objective. As the Developer would have its capital at risk, it should have the right to choose between the two options.

The Kingscliff and Casuarina precincts have typically been restricted to a 3-storey building height, which has controlled the density level as well as ensured the level of facility in the area is balanced (e.g. parking). The height restriction has also meant that the natural environment can be enjoyed by all and avoids the Gold Coast look and feel of ruining the natural environment. Any increase to the current height limit will detract from the area as it will create precedence for future development. I am whole-heartedly opposed to this development.

There is a 3 storey height limit in place, and this should be adhered to.
The Tweed Coast differentiates itself from the Gold Coast by being low rise, not a high rise jungle.
Keep the area low rise forever.

I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed Stage 3 development at Bells Boulevard in Salt Village. This is a thoughtful and well-planned mixed-use project that responds to Kingscliff’s growing needs while respecting its established coastal character. The inclusion of a diverse range of housing — including affordable options — is particularly important in ensuring that people of varying ages, incomes, and household types can continue to live and contribute locally. The proposed MU1 zoning appropriately enables this balanced outcome, and the modest height increase in the northern portion of the site appears reasonable when considered alongside the significant community and public benefits the project will deliver.

The design demonstrates a genuine focus on creating a vibrant, connected precinct rather than simply delivering buildings. Features such as the central courtyard, shared open spaces, wellness and recreational facilities, active street frontages, and generous landscaping will help foster social interaction, encourage active lifestyles, and enhance the overall public realm. The development also makes efficient use of one of the last undeveloped sites in Salt Village, supporting local employment and nearby businesses while maintaining a scale and form that sits comfortably within the neighbourhood. For these reasons, I fully support the proposal and encourage its approval.

I broadly support the project. I believe it is mostly consistent with the existing and future profile of the village. In fact I support all elements of the project except the proposed height. I believe both 21m and/or 4 floors is too high. I suggest at 15-18m and perhaps 3 floors it would blend into the local environment better. This would have a slight positive impact on other concerns raised around infrastructure, traffic and parking.

My objection is to Stage 3 – Mixed Use Development Bells Boulevard Kingscliff Application No SSD -83069459 Location 4-8 Bells Boulevard, Kingscliff and specifically to the application for a five -storey building permitting the buildings to be a maximum of 21 m.
1. This application is inconsistent with Existing Zoning & Planning Intent that myself and others living in the area bought into and undermines community expectations built around existing planning controls. The 5 story 21 m structure represents a significant departure from existing height and scale allowances in the area.
2. Approval of this application will set a precedent for further applications allowing for increased height in the general areas of Kingscliff and Casuarina. This is in effect rezoning by stealth and not in the interest of residents in the area.
3. This development will be is excessive in bulk, height, and visual dominance relative to its surroundings.
4. The introduction of a 5 story building creates a loss of privacy for nearby properties.
5. The development is inconsistent with the current neighbourhood coastal village and suburban nature.
6. The knock on change of nature of the area will negatively impact the value of nearby properties.

I object to 5 levels, this is outside the LC standard 3 x levels