The Pilliga Forest is the "lung" of NW NSW. The last remaining large forested area in north western NSW.
I object to the Narrabri Gas Project as it will cause a massive incursion and disturbance to the Pilliga. It will cut the Pilliga up in a matrix of well sites, roads, treatment plants, fire breaks, pipelines, caustic dams, drains, and gas burn off. It will cause air pollution, noise pollution from 24 hour drilling rigs, generators and general industrial traffic. Imagine the impact on the wildlife and plants of the Pilliga, the serenity of the area, and the quiet enjoyment by others.
Why would we allow one of the last remaining forested areas, a unique area, and a haven for birdlife, to be attacked and raped by such a proposal.

As a property owner I am a stakeholder in any precedent set by the NSW government. This cash grab for a dwindling, costly resource which uses mega-litres to tera-litres, of precious water is shameful. From what I have read, the NSW government has been negligent in ensuring that wells do not leak in the past and cannot ensure that wells will not leak in the future. In fact, all wells will leak eventually. Companies have been required to have no public transparency as to the chemicals used in production or to accurately report leakages. Produced water storage ponds have flowed into water ways due to negligence or extreme weather events. CSG is Costly, Shortsighted and Generational theft.

I strongly object to the Narrabri Gas Project. After completing much research into the Coal Seam Gas industry I am compelled to support those working towards its removal from all communities across Australia. The extraction of this resource provides short term benefits only. The long term effects to the Australian community and the Australian environment is catastrophic. We need to support alternative options.

The Narrabri Gas project should not go ahead for many reasons that i will not cover here. The key objections I make are founded on a good understanding of the project and my experience as a regional development professional and Engineer. The project is not viable for the following reasons:

1. Companies (like AGL) and institutions such as CSIRO have proven that Gas is not a transition fuel in the transformation of the Australian energy sector towards renewables. This gas is not needed for the Australian market. The current Gas debacle has shown the true intention of companies such as Santo and their pursuit of unconventional gas. There is no doubt that the Narrabri gas project is being developed so that Santos can sell it on the overseas market. This makes no sense for NSW nor Australia. Because the few jobs that this project will create and provide ongoing are minuscule compared to the ongoing jobs that could be generated through other development mechanisms for the Narrabri (as well as other regional NSW) area(s). This project is squarely about Santos ripping off the Narrabri region to make profits for multi-national shareholders.

2. The proven impacts of unconventional gas are devastating. These are not just risks, they are real impacts that have already effected the Pilliga forest and will present hazards well into the future. This future would be one in which the company is removed from responsibility and will leave the tax payers and people of the North West to clean up the mess. Unconventional Gas is fraught with risks: to the environment, our ground and surface waters, the workers, the public, the

3. The future of Australia is at stake. The biggest issue facing Narrabri and regional Australia is how to transition beyond coal and gas. The Narrabri gas project will perpetuate Australia's global impact on the climate which will have immense impacts on Newcastle into the future. But most of all this project (and any further gas projects across Australia) will perpetuate Australia's backward march into the ground. Many of our professionals and other workforces are caught in the mining trap. A trap that means they are not able to get the skills and experience necessary to transition to a renewable energy and innovative services or productive future. If we keep drilling into the ground we are missing the opportunities that are above it. Australia's position as a world leading nation is at stake. The world is turning to renewable energy and if we don't transition (as companies like AGL and other leaders are suggesting we should) then we will be left competing against 2nd and 3rd world countries in a fossil free economy, whilst the world leaders like German and China, reap the benefits of competitive advantage by being early adopters to renewables. Australian engineers, technicians and professionals should be working towards improving the Agricultural, high-tech and services sectors, not an industry that will be finished within the next 20 years. When not only these professionals will be without relevant skills, but we will be left trying to clean up the mess the industry has left.

4. The people have spoken. It's time government listened. Unconventional gas is not feasible, workable or wanted. Across NSW professionals, organisations, communities and businesses have confronted proposed CSG projects to stop them in their tracks. The only projects still going are ones that were started before people realised what they were dealing with. It's time the government gave up on the fruitless industry and moved onto long-term, sustainable and productive developments that are in the interest of all Australians.

I OBJECT TO THIS PROJECT because:

The lack of detail: Santos' EIS is very short on detail. It does not provide maps indicating
where these 850 wells and the lines and infrastructure that run between and around them
will go. Santos is seeking a blank cheque consent for this gasfield on the promise that it will
decide where the wells will go afterward using a "Field Development Protocol." No project
has ever been assessed this way before in NSW and the constraints Santos propose are
weak and subject to change later on. This is not an appropriate way to assess the largest
development project ever undertaken under the Environmental Planning and Assessment
Act and the Government must insist that Santos release details to the public about the
placement of its wells, pipelines and some other infrastructure.
There's no justification: The significant harm on the social, environmental and economic
values of the Narrabri Shire and New South Wales that this project will inflict needs to be
weighed against the economic justification for the project, but there is no such economic
justification. Santos is one of several large gas companies that threw the east coast gas
market and the industries that rely on it into turmoil by opening up CSG fields in Queensland
and contracting to sell more gas than those fields can produce to overseas customers. They
drove up the price of gas and are plundering supplies previously available to manufacturers
and power stations.
The gas produced at Narrabri might be as little as 4.9% of the volume contracted for sale out
of Gladstone. It's not going to bring down prices. In fact, it will force prices up, because
unconventional gas like CSG is so expensive to produce and yields are so low. Research
undertaken by gas company AGL shows that gas from the Pilliga would be the most
expensive gas of anywhere in the current east coast gas market. The number of jobs the
project will support once the construction is over is just 145. Weighed against damage to
the land, and the Great Artesian Basin, this makes no sense. We need sustainable jobs, not
plunder for profit.
Groundwater and the Great Artesian Basin: Santos' project is expected to remove 37.5GL
of groundwater over the life of the gasfield, mostly in the early years. The coal seam needs
to be dewatered to release the gas, but this aquifer lies beneath the Pilliga Sandstone, part
of the Great Artesian Basin recharge. Santos' EIS admits that the project will result in a loss
of water from the GAB recharge aquifer over time. CSG in Queensland has drawn down GAB
aquifers already. We can't afford to risk this crucial resource.
Salt: The water removed from the ground by Santos will be treated, but this creates another
problem: what to do with the salt? Peak salt production at Narrabri CSG will be 115 tonnes
per day, or two and a half B-double truckloads per day. In the peak year, this would mean
the creation of 41,900 tonnes of salt for disposal, which Santos says will take place in
landfill.
Cultural heritage and the Pilliga: The Pilliga is a spiritual, cultural and social icon for
Gomeroi/Gamilaraay people. Fragmentation and industrialisation cuts people off from their
heritage and connection to country.
Biodiversity and the Pilliga: The Pilliga is also the largest temperate woodland in New South
Wales. Santos propose clearing nearly 1,000ha of the Pilliga, including habitat for critically
endangered Regent honeyeater and for koalas, which are already in decline in the Pilliga.
Spread across the whole forest, this clearing will fragment much larger areas of habitat. The
gasfield will clear breeding habitat for Pilliga Mouse, which lives nowhere else, and breeding
habitat for other wildlife. It will fragment and degrade the forest. Without specific
information about where the wells and lines will be located, a proper ecological impact
assessment can't be completed. Regardless, the Pilliga is a cherished natural and cultural
icon and must be protected from becoming an industrial gasfield.
Social and health impacts: Santos' social impact assessment is three years old and utterly
inadequate. The compendium of health studies produced by the Concerned Health
Professionals of New York shows mounting evidence for health damage by unconventional
gas operations, including water contamination and respiratory illness. The Government
must insist that Santos conduct a proper health impact assessment including modelling
exposure pathways, reviewing literature and engagement with the Narrabri community. In
Narrabri, this project will have negative impacts on cost-of-living, the labour and housing
markets. The latter is cited in as a benefit of the project but it will not benefit low-income
renters. The effect of the project on cost-of-living in the Shire needs to be modelled,
assessed and considered, as do the labour dynamics of the project. The project entirely
surrounds Yarrie Lake, and Santos propose that wells might come as close as 200m from the
Lake.
Air quality: The air quality assessment fails to include health-damaging fine particulate
pollution with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less (known as PM2.5). With diesel generators at
each well pad and at the water treatment and gas compression plants, there will be
significant PM2.5 emissions. The air quality assessment and greenhouse section also fail to
model the likely substantial escape of fugitive methane emissions.
Dark sky: light pollution from flares, compressor stations and the water treatment plant will
ruin the dark sky needed by the internationally renowned Siding Spring Observatory.
Climate change: recent research by the Melbourne Energy Institute shows that Australia
may be dramatically under-estimating the fugitive methane emissions from unconventional
gas, including coal seam gas. It's not needed or useful as a source of energy: we have the
technology we need to replace gas with renewable energy sources.

I am totally against doing any more harm to our precious environment. There are alternative and more environmentally friendly ways to generate power.

As an environmental chemist I am opposed to Santos' plans for the north west of NSW, especially the Pilliga Forest & surrounding farms.
The risks to some of the best farming land in the state cannot be ignored. Then there is the risk to the Great Artesian Basin recharge.
There are also a significant risks for the National Party in NSW if Santos is allowed to proceed.
I refer you to articles in the Sydney Morning Herald. Sean Nicholls' article titled"Aquifer poisoned" mentioned how Santos was fined $1500 by the NSWEPA. Frankly Santos can not be trusted.
I have also published a major study on the Coxs River and the many sources of contamination feeding into this river. Water is a major resource for our country. Pollution to our waters, as well as degradation of forest and tree areas are both significant issues.
The fracking methods together with the chance of fractures to pipes that run through underground water sources is a very significant risk - only one mistake could be one mistake too many.
The use of water for fracking is also considerable and too much for the water table level for many farmers' bores and no one knows the impact on reducing the Great Artesian Basin. It is considered by scientists as a significant asset not to be risked. Would you condone such a major risk to one of Australia's biggest assets?
The secretiveness of Santos' current explorations, etc. is a major concern.
Yours faithfully
Mr Chris Owens FRACI CChem
Santos was fined $1500 by the NSWEPA. Frankly Santos can not be trusted.
I have also published a major study on the Coxs River and the many sources of contamination feeding into this river. Water is a major resource for our country. Pollution to our waters, as well as degradation of forest and tree areas are both significant issues.
The fracking methods together with the chance of fractures to pipes through underground water sources is a very significant risk - only one mistake could be one mistake too many.
The use of water for fracking is also considerable and too much for the water table level for many farmers' bores and no one knows the impact on reducing the Great Artesian Basin. It is considered by scientists as a significant asset not to be risked. Would you condone such a major risk to one of Australia's biggest assets?
The secretiveness of Santos' current explorations, etc. is a major concern.
Yours faithfully
Mr Chris Owens FRACI CChem

I support the Narrabri Gas Project.
The location of the project in the Pilliga is the best option for gas development in NSW at this time, and Santos is a company with the resources, reputation and capability to ensure the project meets the highest standards and conditions imposed by govt.
The expansive CSG industry in Qld developed by Santos and others is evidence that the industry can favourably co-exist with agriculture and the environment.
To delay or reject gas project will negative impacts on the long term energy requirements of NSW.

Coal seam gas does not have a good environmental record.
This is folly.

The environmental degradation proposed is unacceptable.