Skip to main content
Tracie Crockford
Object
Mullumbimby , New South Wales
Message
Santos CSG project will compromise the viability of the Piliga as a healthy ecosystem and poses a serious risk to the Great Artesian Basin and the Murray Darling basin.

Santos has already allowed a fresh water aquifier in the Piliga to be contaminated with toxic CSG water and it is clear that there has been spills and leaks from storage ponds. Santos is not interested in looking after the community and its right to a healthy future. The long term health and integrity of the land and its' people must come before Santos profit.

For our children and our childrens' children and on behalf of my family I stand with the people of Narrabri, the Australian farming community and the Gamilaraay Traditional custodians in strong opposition the Narrabri Gas Project.
Anne Forsythe
Object
Ainslie , Australian Capital Territory
Message
I object to the proposed Santos CSG wells.This project is inadvisable on many grounds:
- too much water is used in fracking, and Australia is a semi-arid to arid country which cannot afford to endanger our few water resources
-- toxic leakages could occur into our precious artesian basins
-- methane will escape from the wells, and this is a very potent greenhouse gas
-- thousands of tonnes of salt waste will be produced, and Santos has no way of disposing of it
-- the Pilliga is home to many threatened species
-- neither the local community nor the Aboriginal custodians want this project to go ahead.
Please do not allow this project to proceed.
pierre debisscop
Object
coffs harbour , New South Wales
Message
when we will have cut the last tree we will realise we can t eat money
RECC
Comment
Parkside , South Australia
Message
We are very disappointed at the dictatorial approach of tboth he Federal and many State governments towards residents and communities submissions. They are jconstantly just ignored and it appears the "consultation" process is just a token and an excuse to "legitimise" a foregone conclusion.
The bias against Communities is astonishing and the bias towards big corporations is tantamount to ecological suicide..
Fraking is dangerous. It pollutes the artesian waters and has been proven to trigger earthquakes. Many European countries have banned it for that reason.
Listen to science, communities and REASON
Stop the devastation of this beautiful land.
Yours sincerely
Laura Pieraccini
Coordinator
Residents for Environment and Character Conservation
Sharnee Lee
Object
Chapel Hill , Queensland
Message
It is sad to think that the government would allow such a mass scale CSG development in an area known for its contribution to the artesian basin. There has been trouble already in QLD with their CSG projects. Farmers who have farmed the land for generations are having to deal with the toxic fumes which leak out day in and day out. They can set fire to this gas. The water basin underneath is being affected. Water is spilling out from the cracks they have caused in the earth, slowly but surely draining away precious water for farming. With the drought situation being seemingly ever present, why would the government allow such a risky development? More than 90% of the Pilliga community oppose this development and thousands more around Australia are there to back them up.
Jane Brownrigg
Object
Fairfield , Victoria
Message
I am lodging a submission against Santos' Narrabri Gas Project to help end CSG in NSW once and for all. I am proud that Victoria has said 'No' to CSG already.
Gas is a finite fossil fuel. Its exploitation is redundant in a time of wind, solar and pumped hydro power generation.
The risks CSG pose to the environment, food production and the water table all indicate that it has no place and should be outlawed.
I personally had my gas meter abolished this year. My rooftop solar generates more power than I use. I have put my money where my ethics are and it feels very good to know I am minimising my carbon footprint.
sandra johnson
Object
yass , New South Wales
Message
CSG operations have already been shown to be a disastrous process in this country and in the USA where there is a longer history of this practice.
I can't understand why there is still any discussion about allowing fracking anywhere!
Name Withheld
Object
Verrierdale , Queensland
Message
1. Human health is compromised by coal seam gas
A range of hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds can be released into the air from coal seam gas operations, including flaring of gas wells. The effects of volatile organic compounds vary, but can cause eye, nose and airway irritation, headache, nausea, dizziness and loss of coordination⁴. These impacts have been documented in human populations nearby to existing gasfields in Queensland, Sydney and in America.

2. The Narrabri Gas Project has a long history of spills and leaks of toxic CSG water--Santos cannot be trusted to manage the project safely
Santos has already contaminated a freshwater aquifer in the Pilliga with uranium at levels 20 times higher than safe drinking water guidelines, as well as lead, aluminium, arsenic and barium². In addition, there have been over 20 reported spills and leaks of toxic CSG water from storage ponds, pipes and well heads. Santos cannot be trusted.

3. Coal seam gas fuels dangerous climate change
Methane is by far the major component of natural gas, and is a greenhouse gas 72 times more powerful than CO². CSG fields contribute to climate change through the leakage of methane during the production, transport, processing and use of coal seam gas.

4. The Gamilaraay Traditional Custodians are opposed
There are hundreds of cultural sites as well as songlines and stories connecting the Gamilaraay to the forest and to the groundwater beneath. Gamilaraay people are deeply involved in the battle against CSG, and have told Santos they do not want their country sacrificed for a coal seam gas field.

5. The Pilliga is a haven for threatened wildlife
The Pilliga is one of 15 nationally listed `biodiversity hotspots' and is vital to the survival of threatened species like the Koala, Spotted-tailed Quoll, Black-striped Wallaby, Eastern Pygmy-possum, Pilliga Mouse and South-eastern Long-eared Bat. The forest is home to over 200 bird species and is internationally recognised as an Important Bird Area². The Santos gasfield would fragment 95,000 hectares of the Pilliga with well pads, roads, and water and gas pipelines--damaging vital habitat and threatening the survival of endangered species.

6. Farmers and other local community reject the project
Extensive community surveys have shown an average of 96% opposition to CSG. This stretches across a massive 3.2 million hectares of country surrounding the Pilliga forest, including 99 communities. Hundreds of farmers have participated in protest actions unlike any previously seen in the region.

7. The Narrabri Gas Project risks precious water sources, including the Great Australian Basin--Australia's largest groundwater aquifer
The Narrabri gasfield poses a real risk to our two most precious water resources: the Great Artesian Basin and the Murray-Darling Basin. The area of the Great Artesian Basin with the highest recharge rates is almost entirely contained within the Pilliga East forest. In a worst-case scenario, the water removed for CSG extraction could reduce water pressure in the recharge areas--potentially stopping the free flow of waters to the surface at springs and bores across the whole Great Artesian Basin.¹

Creeks in the Pilliga run into the Namoi River--a part of the Murray Darling Basin. This system is vulnerable to contamination from drilling fluid spills and the salty treated water produced from the proposed 850 wells.

8. Risk of fires would increase throughout the Pilliga's tinder-box conditions
Methane flare stacks up to 50m high would be running day and night, even on total fire ban days. The Pilliga is prone to severe bushfires. The project would increase ignition sources as well as extracting, transporting and storing a highly flammable gas right within this extremely fire-prone forest.

9. Thousands of tonnes of salt waste will result from the project
Santos has no solution for disposing of the hundreds of thousands of tonnes of salt that will be produced. Between 17,000 and 42,000 tonnes of salt waste would be produced each year. This industry would leave a toxic legacy in NSW.

10. The nation's premier optical astronomical observatory is at risk
The Siding Springs Observatory, situated in the Warrumbungles and adjacent to the Pilliga, is under threat from the Narrabri Gas Project due to light and dust pollution⁵. The area has been internationally recognised as a `dark sky park'⁶ and the 50m high gas flares proposed by Santos threaten the viability of the facility.

¹SoilFutures Consulting 2014, Great Artesian Basin Recharge Systems and Extent of Petroleum and Gas Leases. http://www.gabpg.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/GAB-Report1.pdf

²http://www.smh.com.au/environment/santos-coal-seam-gas-project-contaminates-aquifer-20140307-34csb.html

³BirdLife International (2017) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Pilliga http://www.birdlife.org

⁴Marion Carey Doctors for the Environment Australia (DEA), Air pollution from coal seam gas may put public health at risk The Conversation, November 20, 2012

⁵https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/oct/21/siding-spring-observatory-threat-coal-seam-gas-light-pollution

⁶http://darksky.org/first-dark-sky-park-in-australia-designated/
PETER CARROLL
Object
Hazelbrook , New South Wales
Message
I wish to object very strongly to the proposal by Santos to establish some 850 wells for coal seam gas in the Piliga, NSW.
Under the pretext of a looming gas supply crisis, Santos seeks to undo the work of many local and other people to protect this unique remaining forest in north west NSW. No such crisis exists, Australia is now the leading exporter of gas in the world and could easily supply itself but our governments have chosen (in order to benefit the profits of companies like Santos) to not require a local supply benchmark. This is contrary to the national interest. As we transition away from fossil fuels the use of gas is necessary. Its own polluting effects should limit this to a minimum but instead the greed of some appears to exceed the need of the community and the environment. Gas extraction (particularly fracking) has been shown to be extremely damaging to water supplies and the environment more generally. While it may burn less carbon intensively than coal it still emits high levels of greenhouse gas and is generally polluting and overall less safe than any renewable form of energy generation. All these factors make it frankly insane for any government to approve such an expansion of gas drilling anywhere but especially in this invaluable habit called the Pilliga. I call on you to refute the EIS of Santos and disallow this environmental vandalism posing as economic development.
angela bennett
Object
Miriam Vale , Queensland
Message
No more wells

Pagination

Subscribe to