I object to AGL's proposed extension of time for the commencement of work on the proposed gas fired power plant project at Dalton (DPP), NSW.

AGL has not provided sufficient cause for extension.

A dishonest and illegal failure to declare political donations, particularly in light of the call-in powers under which this project were approved, make this impossible, at an ethical level, to approve. It must not be extended.

AGL's wish to `modify' the initial plan in an `open ended fashion' smacks of arrogance that we, the Australian people, should oppose. There is no reason AGL should not have their proposal scrutinised as per the normal process of approval. They are asking for an open ended "modification" option.
AGL are not working with the community, are not fulfilling the conditions of the initial approval and must not be allowed to extend approval of this project.

This approval impacts me because it is well known that the time for burning fossil fuels has well and truly passed. The effects of global warming are already evident, they will continue to escalate even with the current concentration of Green House Gasses. It is essential that we now only develop renewable energy, otherwise my children and grandchildren will suffer the consequences of catastrophic global warming, as will everyone on the planet.

- I understand the initial approval was not for a baseload facility. As such, this is actually a new proposal and needs a new assessment;
_A baseload thermal power plant, with thermal storage can fulfill this task.
- I understand that the original approval was granted amid allegations that undeclared political donations influenced the decision. This should be addressed in the documentation for this application for extension, but does not appear to have been;
- this application covers prime agricultural land for what is essentially an `industrial' purpose. Any power plant of this nature should be located at existing `brownfield' sites;
- construction of a power station at this site would have a very significant negative impact on a successful, `best practice' agricultural operation;
- the extension requested is for two years. The pace of development of battery and other renewable technologies is such that in two years this gas-fired plant is highly likely to be obsolete and, if built, potentially a stranded asset. A more responsible approach for government would be to require power generators to develop proposals that embrace available and emerging renewable technologies that will ensure consistency and security of supply.

I object to AGL's request for a two year extension of time for the commencement of work on the proposed gas fired power plant project at Dalton (DPP), NSW. AGL was given approval for a peaking gas power station for a period of 5 years, ending in June 2017.
AGL is now asking for a two year extension to allow them time to develop a new proposal for a baseload power plant. I object to the proposed extension on the following grounds:
1. The initial approval was not for a baseload facility. Therefore this is a new proposal that needs a completely new approval process.
2. This proposed change represents a massive increase in adverse impacts of the Dalton community. From a facility that would operate at times of peak load for between 2% and 15% of any year (7.3 - 55 days per year) to a facility that would be in continual operation.
3. The change of scope from a peak load to a baseload facility represents an up to 50 fold increase in the noise, pollution and operational risk to the local communities. The impact will be even greater if the capacity of the facility is increased beyond the currently approved 1500MW.
4. The amount and geographical impact of the air pollution created by a continually operating base load facility will also be increased. A new approval process should consider the impact on nearby population centres of Bungendore (downwind) and Canberra (large population) in winter, spring, autumn as well as summer.
5. Given the pace of development of battery and other renewable technologies is such that in two years this gas-fired plant is highly likely to be obsolete and, if built, a stranded asset. It is better to abandon the proposal now and invest in an up-to-date facility that incorporates renewable sources and energy storage.

I object to the AGL Dalton power project on the grounds that it will be detrimental to the local environment's flora and fauna and to the local people who have made this place their home.

I object to the proposal to extend the lapsing date of the approval for the Dalton Power Project by 2 years.

Grounds:

1. Due process
1a. The initial approval was not for a baseload facility.
1b. This is a new proposal and needs a new assessment.
1c. I understand that AGL received its original approval under legislation repealed in 2011 after a corruption scandal that brought down the then NSW government.
1d. By repealing this legislation, the NSW Government acknowledged corrupt and unfair practices, such as undisclosed political donations allegedly made during the assessment of the original Dalton proposal.
1e. Hence it may be argued that the original assessment and approval were made under a defective head of authority which does not provide a legitimate basis for the project.

2. Changing Electricity Market and Technologies
2a. The South Australian government is strongly supporting renewables on a large scale, and is making a significant taxpayer-funded investment in them.
2b. The rate of development of battery and alternative generating technologies is such that in two years' time a gas-fired generator may well be obsolete and, if built, a stranded asset. For example, the Department of Defence is assessing molten salt batteries among other technologies to reduce its $6 billion annual expense for diesel fuel.
2c. Opinion is growing that the National Electricity Market is a failure, for instance that "...the current system is unreliable and untenable. That's not because of renewables as has been spuriously claimed, but because the private market has failed to deliver on any front - lower prices, greater system reliability or environmental sustainability." (Flinders University, 3 March 2017) AGL would appear to be pursuing a flawed and obsolescent if not obsolete business model.

The community is very unhappy with the proposed Gas Fired Power Station and I am very much with the community. My wife and I have recently moved into the area and would hate to see a wonderful community harmed by the introduction of this power station. My view is that if a community says no, big companies have a duty to listen these are people's homes and their lives.

Stop the proposal of the Power Plant.

Matt.

I object to any extension to the approval lapse as it unreasonably extends uncertainty for the community.
Any application should involve an entirely new process and application with the associated cost to the proponent in order to dissuade the idea of holding a community to ransom, awaiting changes that make it favourable for the proponent.

Having purchased a block of grazing land on Darbys Rd in 2014 I cannot recall ever being informed of this development during the purchase, I would suggest that AGL look into a more enviromently friendly development such as solar, I believe that this development will have a terrible effect on my grazing property, stock and local community. The land AGL wish to develop should remain as grazing land, why cannot AGL develop land for this project in a more remote area away from local communities.

My wife and I purchased a 120 acre block at the Lachlan Hills Estate on Darbys Rd (also known as Dowlings Rd) which runs off Walshes Rd Dalton, and backs on to the AGL land where this proposal is planned.We chose to purchase this land as it offered a opportunity to own our own small piece of rural land for the peaceful enjoyment in our retirement years.The proposed power plant will have a significant adverse effect on our life and have a significant negative impact on our property value and health and well being.Our Lot no. is 265 Darbys Rd. Our solicitors undertook extensive searches prior to buying this property and none showed any proposed development of a Power Station nearby.

I wish to lodge my objection to AGL's proposed extension of time for the commencement of work on the proposed gas fired power plant project at Dalton (DPP), NSW. AGL have not provided sufficient cause for extension. Their dishonest and illegal failure to declare Political donations, particularly in light of the call-in powers under which this project were approved, make this impossible at an ethical level to approve. It must not be extended. AGL's wish to `modify' the initial plan in an `open ended fashion' smacks of arrogance that we, the Australian people, should oppose. There is no reason AGL should not have their proposal scrutinised as per the normal process of approval. They are asking for an open ended "modification" option. AGL are not working with the community, are not fulfilling the conditions of the initial approval and must not be allowed to extend approval of this project. This objection is lodged as the extension does not meet the philosophy of 'good, clean and fair' as dictated by the Slow Food movement.

I am writing to object to the Dalton Power Project Application Number MP 10_0035 MOD 1.

A gas fired power station such as this, should not be seen in isolation as such a solution, without considering the impacts on the communities which will be subjected to it. An open cycle gas power station like the one proposed for Dalton, produces 85% of the emissions of a black coal fired power station.

The cumulative impact of highly persistent pollutants in harvested rainwater used locally for domestic drinking water are of critical concern to the community.

Those that choose not to subject themselves and their children to industrial noise and chemical exposure by relocating will not be compensated, yet AGL will generate profits for their shareholders out of the hardship and health risks they impose on the residents and tourism industry of the area.

If people are forced to sell their homes and properties to AGL, we will lose the volume of population necessary to continue our businesses, schools, trade and tourism in the district; the socio/economic fabric of our towns will be irreparably damaged. The possible construction of the Power Station poses a significant threat to the value of properties and business in the region. Any actual construction will be devastating.

AGL received their original approval under highly questionable legislation that was repealed in 2011 after a corruption scandal that brought down the then NSW government. This loophole legislation affords our communities little say in how our towns and lives will be affected.

By repealing it, the NSW Government has acknowledged the corrupt and unfair practices that had resulted from Part 3A. Corrupt and unfair practices such as AGL's undisclosed political donations during the assessment of the Dalton Power Project. The "transitional" provisions are also soon to be repealed. We need our elected representatives to not simply allow AGL to avail themselves of the processes under Part 3A, in order to be seen as doing something about energy security.

The impacts on the community are not acceptable. We urge our politicians to acknowledge the severity of the impact that this proposal has already had on the communities of Dalton and Gunning, and the devastating consequences for us if it ever proceeds. We do not believe the contribution to energy market security that such a peaking facility would make, justifies the harm that would be inflicted upon us.

AGL have also been found guilty of giving unlawful political donations to the NSW government during a period when this project was initially being considered.

For these reasons I object to AGL being granted a 2 year extension to consider this project.

Kind regards