Carol-Ann Fletcher
Object
Carol-Ann Fletcher
Object
Somerset
,
Tasmania
Message
I object and do NOT consent to this project for the following reasons:
The fact that this project and other similar renewable projects are connected to potentially flammable and dangerous high voltage transmission lines and towers. For example:
Just over sixteen years ago, on the 7th of February 2009, 6 out of the 11 Black Saturday fires that took 173 lives and did untold damage to property, livestock and wildlife, were started by high voltage transmission lines. This was such a devastating, large scale catastrophe that a Royal Commission was called to investigate why these fires happened and how they could be prevented in the future - VBRC_Summary_PF.pdf, Remembering Black Saturday - 15th anniversary | Emergency Victoria.
Cameron Stuart of Brittanica.com on the 20th of January 2025 (Black Saturday bushfires | Causes, Deaths, Map, & Location | Britannica), described the horrific, catastrophic, devastating Black Saturday fires in detail:
"On February 7 Victorians were told to brace for the “worst day” in the state’s history: weather forecasters warned of a record heat wave with temperatures soaring to 115.5 °F (46.4 °C), combined with gale-force winds of up to 56 miles (90 km) per hour. That day more than 47 major fires erupted across the state, 14 of them claiming lives or causing significant damage. The most deadly conflagration, known as the Kilmore East fire, which claimed 121 lives, was sparked by a faulty power pole near the township of Kilmore East, 37 miles (60 km) north of Melbourne. The flames quickly jumped a major highway and roared into a forest, where they turned into a giant fireball, dwarfing the resources of local firefighters, who could only flee in its path. Aided by steep slopes and powerful winds, this fire raced through a series of townships, including Kinglake (where 38 people died), Strathewen (27 perished), and St. Andrews (12 were killed), catching residents by surprise and trapping many in their homes. Some sought to escape by car as the fires approached, but dozens died on the roads as they were overtaken by the fire, which leapt 330 feet (100 metres) above the tree line and was powerful enough to kill with radiant heat from nearly 1,000 feet
Late in the afternoon a sudden change in wind direction pushed the fire to the northeast, bringing new towns into its path. A parallel fire, known as the Murrindindi fire, also blew to the northeast, swallowing the unsuspecting tourist town of Marysville, where 34 people lost their lives. Fire experts said that these two fires alone released energy equivalent to that of 1,500 atomic bombs like the one dropped on Hiroshima, Japan."
Fire experts said that these two fires alone released energy equivalent to that of 1,500 atomic bombs like the one dropped on Hiroshima, Japan."
Not only are lithium battery factories extremely dangerous, but they are also deadly Lithium battery factory fire kills 22 in South Korea.
In California, it was reported that it was PG&E's powerlines that had sparked the recent horrific and deeply devastating fires - , How Did The California Wildfires Start? Officials Weigh Power Lines, Fireworks—And Arson (forbes.com), PG&E’s Lengthy Record of Starting Wildfires, and What the Company Is Doing to Change It (californialocal.com) and in fact, PG$E was found to be responsible for the worst fire in California history - the Camp Fire (Customers of PG&E, other utilities pay billions for wildfire prevention- CalMatters)
"POWER LINES AND ELECTRIC INFRASTRUCTURE
----------------------------------------
Multiple residents of Altadena sued Southern California Edison on Monday, alleging the Eaton Fire was started by the company’s electrical equipment. The lawsuits cite eyewitness reports of sparking power lines. The company has pushed back against the theory, saying in a statement Sunday its “analysis shows no interruptions or operational/electrical anomalies in the 12 hours prior to the fire’s reported start time until more than one hour after the reported start time of the fire.” One of the filed complaints reportedly alleged, “there is clear evidence from video footage, photographs, and witness accounts that the fire was caused by electrical equipment operated by Defendants Edison International and Southern California Edison.” Power infrastructure has been a leading cause of fires in California in the past—with eight of the state’s 20 most destructive fires having power-related causes—and the amount of fires started by equipment has grown recently, The New York Times reported."
Interestingly enough,, prior to the recent wildfires in California, PG&E had a mitigation plan, which as you can very plainly see did NOT stop the extremely horrific, deadly and destructive California Wildfires from happening, much less actually put them out, and so now, what will happen to all the taxpayers who lost their homes, livelihoods, pets, etc because of PG&E's powerlines sparking the tremendously fast moving fires throughout Southern California, doing untold damage, along with taking lives? (TN13803_20240402T112956_PGE's_2025_Wildfire_Mitigation_Plan_Update.pdf).
And then there is the astronomical and, in my opinion, completely irresponsible and unjustifiable cost of these renewables:
Stated in the 2025 SUBMISSION TO CSIRO'S DRAFT 2024-25 GENCOST REPORT.pdf
"3.0 Capital Cost Factors GenCost defines future capital cost factors 6 for various generation and storage technologies. It observes recent years when freight and raw materials rapidly increased costs. Its use of a 2006 to 2009 price bubble to show prices returned to previous expectations is not entirely realistic since the industry was much smaller at that time and basic power costs affecting manufacturing have been recently escalating much more rapidly. GenCost’s contention that “…inflationary pressures for most technologies and the cost of some…such as solar PV and batteries are falling again” is contestable. We believe this is only a small part of the story. In our view: • Renewables are now relatively mature technologies after 30 years of intensive development, thus making assumptions of substantial future cost decreases too optimistic. • Labour costs have been hit with high inflation recently; these costs are not going to go down. • The dominance of one country, China, in the entire supply chain for renewables makes higher future prices likely as competition is stifled and hence deserves more careful analysis. • Increasing demand in global markets may cause price rises. • Shipping costs are being hit by increasing fuel costs. • Operating costs of renewables are greater than anticipated, as the UK and Germany have found. • Subsidies for the cheapest form of electricity generation, which surely should not still be necessary) could be reduced, adding to manufacturing costs. Compounding the uncertainties in predicting future costs are: a. realisation that the extraordinary costs involved are not affordable nor sustainable, b. the negative impact on national economies from unreliable intermittent power, c. many countries, including the largest, doing nothing or very little, to meet Net Zero goals, d. the withdrawal of the US from the Paris Accord, e. the mounting market failure of EVs, f. recognition that the science of climate catastrophism is overstated and overhyped, and g. the severe environmental impacts of solar and wind generation installations being regarded as unacceptable. 6 GenCost Section 5 P3"
This report/submission was written by 19 independent engineers and professionals who are all well qualified to comment on the true costs of implementing the government’s Net Zero 2050 policy for the National Electricity Market (NEM):
Professor Michael Asten, PhD, BSc (Hon), BLitt, FRAS Ben Beattie, BE(Elec), CPEng RPEQ Jeremy Barlow, BE, MBA, FAIMM William Bourke, BSc, BEng (Aero), MEng Sc. Michael Bowden IEng (Electronics-UK); CPL; CQP Rafe Champion, MSc (History and Philosophy of Science), B.Ag.Sc. (Hons) Arthur Day, PhD, BSc (Hon) Paul R C Goard, BSc, Physicist, M.A.I.P., M.I.of P., M.A.I.E., M.A.M.O.S. Peter J F Harris, BEng, Dipl. Prod Eng. Professor Emeritus Aynsley Kellow, BA(Hons) PhD Bryan Leyland, MSc (Power systems) DistFEngNZ, FIMechE, FIEE (rtd) John McBratney, B. Tech (Electronic Engineering), formerly MIE Aust, MIEEE John McLean, PhD Paul Miskelly, BE MEngSc Electrical Engineering Grant Piper, BE Aero UNSW, FRAeS, Chair NREN Peter Ridd, PhD, BSc James R (Jim) Simpson, (Ret., former business unit manager, OTC & Telstra) Bill Stinson, Dip.Tech(Building), B.AppSc.(Building), Dip Labour Relations & Law, Cert. Design Sc. (Facilities) James Taylor, PhD, MSc, BEng Elect (Hon), PEng, FCASI
In addition, developers, NOT landowners, farmers or people who host renewables should be made to not only pay full decommission costs of these renewables, they also should be held solely responsible, along with the planning commission and government to ensure that no electrical bushfires breaks out of the renewables, high voltage transmission lines and towers, wind turbines, Battery storage units, solar "farms" (farms is a misnomer indeed) and any other energy infrastructure, NOT landowners, farmers or people who host renewables. https://braddonbeagle.com/do-we-have-a-do-as-i-do-or-do-as-i-say-government-you-decide/
The fact that this project and other similar renewable projects are connected to potentially flammable and dangerous high voltage transmission lines and towers. For example:
Just over sixteen years ago, on the 7th of February 2009, 6 out of the 11 Black Saturday fires that took 173 lives and did untold damage to property, livestock and wildlife, were started by high voltage transmission lines. This was such a devastating, large scale catastrophe that a Royal Commission was called to investigate why these fires happened and how they could be prevented in the future - VBRC_Summary_PF.pdf, Remembering Black Saturday - 15th anniversary | Emergency Victoria.
Cameron Stuart of Brittanica.com on the 20th of January 2025 (Black Saturday bushfires | Causes, Deaths, Map, & Location | Britannica), described the horrific, catastrophic, devastating Black Saturday fires in detail:
"On February 7 Victorians were told to brace for the “worst day” in the state’s history: weather forecasters warned of a record heat wave with temperatures soaring to 115.5 °F (46.4 °C), combined with gale-force winds of up to 56 miles (90 km) per hour. That day more than 47 major fires erupted across the state, 14 of them claiming lives or causing significant damage. The most deadly conflagration, known as the Kilmore East fire, which claimed 121 lives, was sparked by a faulty power pole near the township of Kilmore East, 37 miles (60 km) north of Melbourne. The flames quickly jumped a major highway and roared into a forest, where they turned into a giant fireball, dwarfing the resources of local firefighters, who could only flee in its path. Aided by steep slopes and powerful winds, this fire raced through a series of townships, including Kinglake (where 38 people died), Strathewen (27 perished), and St. Andrews (12 were killed), catching residents by surprise and trapping many in their homes. Some sought to escape by car as the fires approached, but dozens died on the roads as they were overtaken by the fire, which leapt 330 feet (100 metres) above the tree line and was powerful enough to kill with radiant heat from nearly 1,000 feet
Late in the afternoon a sudden change in wind direction pushed the fire to the northeast, bringing new towns into its path. A parallel fire, known as the Murrindindi fire, also blew to the northeast, swallowing the unsuspecting tourist town of Marysville, where 34 people lost their lives. Fire experts said that these two fires alone released energy equivalent to that of 1,500 atomic bombs like the one dropped on Hiroshima, Japan."
Fire experts said that these two fires alone released energy equivalent to that of 1,500 atomic bombs like the one dropped on Hiroshima, Japan."
Not only are lithium battery factories extremely dangerous, but they are also deadly Lithium battery factory fire kills 22 in South Korea.
In California, it was reported that it was PG&E's powerlines that had sparked the recent horrific and deeply devastating fires - , How Did The California Wildfires Start? Officials Weigh Power Lines, Fireworks—And Arson (forbes.com), PG&E’s Lengthy Record of Starting Wildfires, and What the Company Is Doing to Change It (californialocal.com) and in fact, PG$E was found to be responsible for the worst fire in California history - the Camp Fire (Customers of PG&E, other utilities pay billions for wildfire prevention- CalMatters)
"POWER LINES AND ELECTRIC INFRASTRUCTURE
----------------------------------------
Multiple residents of Altadena sued Southern California Edison on Monday, alleging the Eaton Fire was started by the company’s electrical equipment. The lawsuits cite eyewitness reports of sparking power lines. The company has pushed back against the theory, saying in a statement Sunday its “analysis shows no interruptions or operational/electrical anomalies in the 12 hours prior to the fire’s reported start time until more than one hour after the reported start time of the fire.” One of the filed complaints reportedly alleged, “there is clear evidence from video footage, photographs, and witness accounts that the fire was caused by electrical equipment operated by Defendants Edison International and Southern California Edison.” Power infrastructure has been a leading cause of fires in California in the past—with eight of the state’s 20 most destructive fires having power-related causes—and the amount of fires started by equipment has grown recently, The New York Times reported."
Interestingly enough,, prior to the recent wildfires in California, PG&E had a mitigation plan, which as you can very plainly see did NOT stop the extremely horrific, deadly and destructive California Wildfires from happening, much less actually put them out, and so now, what will happen to all the taxpayers who lost their homes, livelihoods, pets, etc because of PG&E's powerlines sparking the tremendously fast moving fires throughout Southern California, doing untold damage, along with taking lives? (TN13803_20240402T112956_PGE's_2025_Wildfire_Mitigation_Plan_Update.pdf).
And then there is the astronomical and, in my opinion, completely irresponsible and unjustifiable cost of these renewables:
Stated in the 2025 SUBMISSION TO CSIRO'S DRAFT 2024-25 GENCOST REPORT.pdf
"3.0 Capital Cost Factors GenCost defines future capital cost factors 6 for various generation and storage technologies. It observes recent years when freight and raw materials rapidly increased costs. Its use of a 2006 to 2009 price bubble to show prices returned to previous expectations is not entirely realistic since the industry was much smaller at that time and basic power costs affecting manufacturing have been recently escalating much more rapidly. GenCost’s contention that “…inflationary pressures for most technologies and the cost of some…such as solar PV and batteries are falling again” is contestable. We believe this is only a small part of the story. In our view: • Renewables are now relatively mature technologies after 30 years of intensive development, thus making assumptions of substantial future cost decreases too optimistic. • Labour costs have been hit with high inflation recently; these costs are not going to go down. • The dominance of one country, China, in the entire supply chain for renewables makes higher future prices likely as competition is stifled and hence deserves more careful analysis. • Increasing demand in global markets may cause price rises. • Shipping costs are being hit by increasing fuel costs. • Operating costs of renewables are greater than anticipated, as the UK and Germany have found. • Subsidies for the cheapest form of electricity generation, which surely should not still be necessary) could be reduced, adding to manufacturing costs. Compounding the uncertainties in predicting future costs are: a. realisation that the extraordinary costs involved are not affordable nor sustainable, b. the negative impact on national economies from unreliable intermittent power, c. many countries, including the largest, doing nothing or very little, to meet Net Zero goals, d. the withdrawal of the US from the Paris Accord, e. the mounting market failure of EVs, f. recognition that the science of climate catastrophism is overstated and overhyped, and g. the severe environmental impacts of solar and wind generation installations being regarded as unacceptable. 6 GenCost Section 5 P3"
This report/submission was written by 19 independent engineers and professionals who are all well qualified to comment on the true costs of implementing the government’s Net Zero 2050 policy for the National Electricity Market (NEM):
Professor Michael Asten, PhD, BSc (Hon), BLitt, FRAS Ben Beattie, BE(Elec), CPEng RPEQ Jeremy Barlow, BE, MBA, FAIMM William Bourke, BSc, BEng (Aero), MEng Sc. Michael Bowden IEng (Electronics-UK); CPL; CQP Rafe Champion, MSc (History and Philosophy of Science), B.Ag.Sc. (Hons) Arthur Day, PhD, BSc (Hon) Paul R C Goard, BSc, Physicist, M.A.I.P., M.I.of P., M.A.I.E., M.A.M.O.S. Peter J F Harris, BEng, Dipl. Prod Eng. Professor Emeritus Aynsley Kellow, BA(Hons) PhD Bryan Leyland, MSc (Power systems) DistFEngNZ, FIMechE, FIEE (rtd) John McBratney, B. Tech (Electronic Engineering), formerly MIE Aust, MIEEE John McLean, PhD Paul Miskelly, BE MEngSc Electrical Engineering Grant Piper, BE Aero UNSW, FRAeS, Chair NREN Peter Ridd, PhD, BSc James R (Jim) Simpson, (Ret., former business unit manager, OTC & Telstra) Bill Stinson, Dip.Tech(Building), B.AppSc.(Building), Dip Labour Relations & Law, Cert. Design Sc. (Facilities) James Taylor, PhD, MSc, BEng Elect (Hon), PEng, FCASI
In addition, developers, NOT landowners, farmers or people who host renewables should be made to not only pay full decommission costs of these renewables, they also should be held solely responsible, along with the planning commission and government to ensure that no electrical bushfires breaks out of the renewables, high voltage transmission lines and towers, wind turbines, Battery storage units, solar "farms" (farms is a misnomer indeed) and any other energy infrastructure, NOT landowners, farmers or people who host renewables. https://braddonbeagle.com/do-we-have-a-do-as-i-do-or-do-as-i-say-government-you-decide/
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Coolah
,
New South Wales
Message
Goldwind is a Chinese company that has already imported Asbestos into Australia in its Wind turbines and now they want to install shipping containers of lithium ion batteries. What toxic legacy will this leave? STOP destroying our environment. STOP using taxpayers funds in order to enhance the profit of Goldwind. The result of this project will be increased fire risk, increased diesel generator use, increased land fill, increased envrionmental damage and increased cost of electricity for consumers.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Swan Hill
,
Victoria
Message
The parasitic crooks pedalling and approving Intermittent, weather dependent Solar/Wind generation with bankruptingly costly BESS are completely failing the Australian people & irresponsibly destroying our country - which is blessed with far superior, natural energy resources that they are cruelly depriving us of.
Who is the enabler of this torturous prioritisation of CCP control of our electricity system and the deliberate sacrificing of our once energy independent, secure country?
Who is the enabler of this torturous prioritisation of CCP control of our electricity system and the deliberate sacrificing of our once energy independent, secure country?
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
LEETON
,
New South Wales
Message
There are no benefits whatsoever from this ruinable junk that’s a poisonous curse to the public, our essential energy security, food security, our economy and sovereignty.
The predatory vested interests are manipulating the market - profiteering at our expense - while we all suffering the Government inflicted Cost of Living Crisis - caused by intermittent RenewaBULLs and BESS that profits from price volatility and arbitrage, distorting electricity markets and increasing costs for consumers.
The predatory vested interests are manipulating the market - profiteering at our expense - while we all suffering the Government inflicted Cost of Living Crisis - caused by intermittent RenewaBULLs and BESS that profits from price volatility and arbitrage, distorting electricity markets and increasing costs for consumers.
Save Our Surroundings Swan Hill
Object
Save Our Surroundings Swan Hill
Object
Swan Hill
,
New South Wales
Message
This CCP reliant, filthy, rip-off BESS plan’s ridiculously short 10 year life span and endless replacement makes no sense!
It defies all aspects of the National Electricity Law Objective regarding:-
(a) price, quality, safety, reliability and security of supply of electricity;
and
(b) the reliability, safety and security of the national electricity system
This BESS creates a cycle of constant replacement, contamination, ever escalating toxic waste and austerity from rising costs.
It defies all aspects of the National Electricity Law Objective regarding:-
(a) price, quality, safety, reliability and security of supply of electricity;
and
(b) the reliability, safety and security of the national electricity system
This BESS creates a cycle of constant replacement, contamination, ever escalating toxic waste and austerity from rising costs.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
GUYRA
,
New South Wales
Message
OBJECT to Applicant: Goldwind - who want an addition of battery, Coppabella Wind, Yass, Murrumbidgee Vital Upper Tributary Catchments.
Halt All Further progress of Coppabella Wind. Goldwind should be in an Inquiry shouldn't they. Illegal entry of asbestos reasons.
Goldwind are surely Under investigation aren't they? Aren't they? They are (?) for asbestos issues as in ILLEGAL ENTRY of asbestos into Australia. How did that happen? How? How? How did it happen? Who breached the law?
It is up to the goodwill of the owner, developer, gov.au, nsw.gov.au, vic.gov.au, sa.gov.au, councils mayors councillors planners to develop in a way that does not pose a safety risk to human health or the environment.
Do you, nsw.gov.au, gov.au, councils NSW,, engage a building engineer or surveyor to sign off on the build, and if so, are they covered for liability insurance for the construction of BESS? (Add Wind Turbines?)
You - gov.au, qld.gov.au, .gov.au, vic.gov.au, sa.gov.au- have a General Environmental Duty (GED) under Section 25(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 2017, to minimise the risk of harm to human health and the environment from pollution, so far as reasonably practicable. In Victoria, it is a criminal offence to breach one's GED. Are you complying with your GED obligations in the construction of BESS and or wind farms? The answer is NO. You have Breached GED toward your Fellow Australians eating Off Murray Darling Basin Food Production Catchments nb. You should All be Charged - all of you because for too long you have Breached GED obligations toward your Fellow Australians state and federal.
Mayors and Councillors will be included of course for breaching GED obligations towards their Fellow Australians, how dare they.
Ban BESS Now, Right Now, in Australia.
Hold those Responsible fully Accountable and Charged. Risk to the public, Innocent, reasons.
Um.....how DOES gov.au, nsw.gov.au, vic.gov.au, sa.gov.au get away with it ? Goldwind? They Always do. I do Not want them to you see. How are they Doing it is a Question isn't it.
Lithium-ion batteries pose a safety risk to human health and environment. As do BESS Now planned All over Australia???? Who Is Responsible For That ?? Find out will ya. Hurry Up. Rapid Approval rates SOMEHOW forBESS and Lithium Ion batteries by by by who who who? Name and Shame the who someone. Cease and Desist BESS and Lithium Ion batteries in on upon Australia Immediately.
Has to be you, Ngunnawal peoples. You claim you are the Custodians. Act. Stop BESS Now. Or you ain't a Custodian you see. Custodians Care for Country All On Country Hey. You aren't. How dare you. How Dare You Ngunnawal peoples who do Not Care for Country Sacred Always for All prior to 187 years ago.
Mob are ? No Care.
The Ngunnawal people are the Traditional Custodians of the Canberra region. Ohh c'mon. No such thing. You people Disgust me. You ain't Custodians. You No Care.
You No Care You No Care I know you don't.
Murray Darling Basin region be very Aware is Aboriginal Cultural Heritage region from the Sacred ever so Sacred Mountains dividing east flow from west flow to the seas they reach or Did once upon a time but no more due to Disgraceful Inappropriate Cumulative Anthropogenic Changes To the Entire Murray Darling Basin.
Who's fault is that? Yours, gov.au, qld.gov.au nsw.gov.au, vic.gov.au, sa.gov.au. Stop blaming Climate change. Gov.au is at fault. Stop this transition IMMEDIATELY because WATER IS PRECIOUS Always Was until Filthy White man changed all that in under 187 years of occupation of an InHabited Land they took away from the Original Inhabitants living simply in Honour and Respect toward Country a Cultural Heritage passed on over century after century back to 67,843 years or so ago.
Filthy white man ways Cease Now on in over through the Lands Sacred to the All Here Now, Elders Past Present All.
Ban BESS Now, Immediately Now. Too Risky in Australia, Yes.
Search Assist says:- first description in Search,nb:-
"Lithium-ion batteries can be toxic due to the chemicals they contain, which can be harmful if released into the environment or if the battery is damaged. Additionally, when these batteries catch fire, they can release hazardous gases that pose health risks to nearby individuals".
https://www.fire.qld.gov.au/safety-education/battery-and-charging-safety/lithium-ion-battery-safety Be aware of the risks related to damaged lithium-ion batteries, including electric shock, secondary fire risks, and exposure to toxic, corrosive, and flammable vapours and substances.
https://www.alsym.com/blog/lithium-based-batteries-are-toxic-from-start-to-finish/ How do we make lithium-ion batteries less toxic? Making lithium-ion batteries less toxic will be difficult. Lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP / LiFePO4) batteries that eliminate the need for cobalt are a step in the right direction, but remain problematic. The only true option is to move away from lithium-based
https://thebatterytips.com/battery-specifications/is-lithium-ion-battery-toxic/ Lithium ion batteries can be toxic. They contain harmful materials like metals (copper, nickel, lead) and dangerous organic chemicals (flammable electrolytes). Improper disposal poses health risks and environmental hazards. To minimize toxicity, it's important to handle and recycle these
https://www.ri.se/sites/default/files/2020-10/Toxicity%20risk%20report_18%20June%202020_0.pdf Most currently used lithium-ion battery electrolytes on exposure to the environment are toxic, irritant or harmful in addition to being flammable
https://teex.org/wp-content/uploads/LITHIUM-ION-BATTERY-FIRES-AND-EMISSIONS-CHARACTERIZATION.pdf The tests concluded that: Li-ion battery thermal runaway fires are an extreme emissions event, releasing highly toxic gases and particles that exceed the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)-permissible exposure limits (PEL)
https://www.frv.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-11/Battery-Safety-for-Consumers.pdf Risk: Lithium-ion Batteries can be a fire risk. Occasionally, if a Lithium-ion Battery is improperly charged, handled, stored or disposed of there is a risk of overheating, catching fire or explosion. This also increases the risk of a house fire, garage fire or personal injury.
Halt All Further processing of Li-ion batteries in Australia Immediately!
Protect Our Air, Soil, Lands, Water, Waterways Australian and Murray Darling Basin Food Production Catchments nb, nb, nb, nb, nb, nb, nb from Heavy Metals.
https://sfstandard.com/2025/02/06/erin-brockovich-lawsuit-moss-landing-power-plant-fire/
Halt All Further progress of Coppabella Wind. Goldwind should be in an Inquiry shouldn't they. Illegal entry of asbestos reasons.
Goldwind are surely Under investigation aren't they? Aren't they? They are (?) for asbestos issues as in ILLEGAL ENTRY of asbestos into Australia. How did that happen? How? How? How did it happen? Who breached the law?
It is up to the goodwill of the owner, developer, gov.au, nsw.gov.au, vic.gov.au, sa.gov.au, councils mayors councillors planners to develop in a way that does not pose a safety risk to human health or the environment.
Do you, nsw.gov.au, gov.au, councils NSW,, engage a building engineer or surveyor to sign off on the build, and if so, are they covered for liability insurance for the construction of BESS? (Add Wind Turbines?)
You - gov.au, qld.gov.au, .gov.au, vic.gov.au, sa.gov.au- have a General Environmental Duty (GED) under Section 25(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 2017, to minimise the risk of harm to human health and the environment from pollution, so far as reasonably practicable. In Victoria, it is a criminal offence to breach one's GED. Are you complying with your GED obligations in the construction of BESS and or wind farms? The answer is NO. You have Breached GED toward your Fellow Australians eating Off Murray Darling Basin Food Production Catchments nb. You should All be Charged - all of you because for too long you have Breached GED obligations toward your Fellow Australians state and federal.
Mayors and Councillors will be included of course for breaching GED obligations towards their Fellow Australians, how dare they.
Ban BESS Now, Right Now, in Australia.
Hold those Responsible fully Accountable and Charged. Risk to the public, Innocent, reasons.
Um.....how DOES gov.au, nsw.gov.au, vic.gov.au, sa.gov.au get away with it ? Goldwind? They Always do. I do Not want them to you see. How are they Doing it is a Question isn't it.
Lithium-ion batteries pose a safety risk to human health and environment. As do BESS Now planned All over Australia???? Who Is Responsible For That ?? Find out will ya. Hurry Up. Rapid Approval rates SOMEHOW forBESS and Lithium Ion batteries by by by who who who? Name and Shame the who someone. Cease and Desist BESS and Lithium Ion batteries in on upon Australia Immediately.
Has to be you, Ngunnawal peoples. You claim you are the Custodians. Act. Stop BESS Now. Or you ain't a Custodian you see. Custodians Care for Country All On Country Hey. You aren't. How dare you. How Dare You Ngunnawal peoples who do Not Care for Country Sacred Always for All prior to 187 years ago.
Mob are ? No Care.
The Ngunnawal people are the Traditional Custodians of the Canberra region. Ohh c'mon. No such thing. You people Disgust me. You ain't Custodians. You No Care.
You No Care You No Care I know you don't.
Murray Darling Basin region be very Aware is Aboriginal Cultural Heritage region from the Sacred ever so Sacred Mountains dividing east flow from west flow to the seas they reach or Did once upon a time but no more due to Disgraceful Inappropriate Cumulative Anthropogenic Changes To the Entire Murray Darling Basin.
Who's fault is that? Yours, gov.au, qld.gov.au nsw.gov.au, vic.gov.au, sa.gov.au. Stop blaming Climate change. Gov.au is at fault. Stop this transition IMMEDIATELY because WATER IS PRECIOUS Always Was until Filthy White man changed all that in under 187 years of occupation of an InHabited Land they took away from the Original Inhabitants living simply in Honour and Respect toward Country a Cultural Heritage passed on over century after century back to 67,843 years or so ago.
Filthy white man ways Cease Now on in over through the Lands Sacred to the All Here Now, Elders Past Present All.
Ban BESS Now, Immediately Now. Too Risky in Australia, Yes.
Search Assist says:- first description in Search,nb:-
"Lithium-ion batteries can be toxic due to the chemicals they contain, which can be harmful if released into the environment or if the battery is damaged. Additionally, when these batteries catch fire, they can release hazardous gases that pose health risks to nearby individuals".
https://www.fire.qld.gov.au/safety-education/battery-and-charging-safety/lithium-ion-battery-safety Be aware of the risks related to damaged lithium-ion batteries, including electric shock, secondary fire risks, and exposure to toxic, corrosive, and flammable vapours and substances.
https://www.alsym.com/blog/lithium-based-batteries-are-toxic-from-start-to-finish/ How do we make lithium-ion batteries less toxic? Making lithium-ion batteries less toxic will be difficult. Lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP / LiFePO4) batteries that eliminate the need for cobalt are a step in the right direction, but remain problematic. The only true option is to move away from lithium-based
https://thebatterytips.com/battery-specifications/is-lithium-ion-battery-toxic/ Lithium ion batteries can be toxic. They contain harmful materials like metals (copper, nickel, lead) and dangerous organic chemicals (flammable electrolytes). Improper disposal poses health risks and environmental hazards. To minimize toxicity, it's important to handle and recycle these
https://www.ri.se/sites/default/files/2020-10/Toxicity%20risk%20report_18%20June%202020_0.pdf Most currently used lithium-ion battery electrolytes on exposure to the environment are toxic, irritant or harmful in addition to being flammable
https://teex.org/wp-content/uploads/LITHIUM-ION-BATTERY-FIRES-AND-EMISSIONS-CHARACTERIZATION.pdf The tests concluded that: Li-ion battery thermal runaway fires are an extreme emissions event, releasing highly toxic gases and particles that exceed the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)-permissible exposure limits (PEL)
https://www.frv.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-11/Battery-Safety-for-Consumers.pdf Risk: Lithium-ion Batteries can be a fire risk. Occasionally, if a Lithium-ion Battery is improperly charged, handled, stored or disposed of there is a risk of overheating, catching fire or explosion. This also increases the risk of a house fire, garage fire or personal injury.
Halt All Further processing of Li-ion batteries in Australia Immediately!
Protect Our Air, Soil, Lands, Water, Waterways Australian and Murray Darling Basin Food Production Catchments nb, nb, nb, nb, nb, nb, nb from Heavy Metals.
https://sfstandard.com/2025/02/06/erin-brockovich-lawsuit-moss-landing-power-plant-fire/
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
GRIFFITH
,
New South Wales
Message
This horrible plan is for toxic pollution that lingers for generations - defying all the Principles of Ecologically Sustainable Development - including the Precautionary Principle and Intergenerational Equity.
Hazardous Battery fires disperse microscopic heavy metals and fluorinated compounds that are highly toxic, bioaccumulate, evade detection, and leave no viable cleanup pathway - resulting in toxic wasteland and public health and safety disasters.
Hazardous Battery fires disperse microscopic heavy metals and fluorinated compounds that are highly toxic, bioaccumulate, evade detection, and leave no viable cleanup pathway - resulting in toxic wasteland and public health and safety disasters.
Save Our Surroundings Murrumbidgee
Object
Save Our Surroundings Murrumbidgee
Object
Griffith
,
New South Wales
Message
Independent research warns that mega-scale BESS fires exceed firefighting capabilities and have life threatening, poisonous impacts for human beings and biodiversity, while the NSW Government is hastily and irresponsibly approving these dangerously volatile projects without doing their due diligence.
This horrific failure in their duty of care to the people of NSW/Australia - in spite of the catastrophic impacts - just to appease vested interests - is outrageous and must be condemned.
“Safety of Grid Scale Lithium-ion Battery Energy Storage Systems”
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352158070_Safety_of_Grid_Scale_Lithium-ion_Battery_Energy_Storage_Systems
This horrific failure in their duty of care to the people of NSW/Australia - in spite of the catastrophic impacts - just to appease vested interests - is outrageous and must be condemned.
“Safety of Grid Scale Lithium-ion Battery Energy Storage Systems”
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352158070_Safety_of_Grid_Scale_Lithium-ion_Battery_Energy_Storage_Systems