Application No: SSD-80211463 July 2026
Project: Mixed-use development with in-fill affordable housing at 164-172 and 174-194 William Street, Woolloomooloo
Position: OBJECT
SUPPLEMENTARY SUBMISSION – AMENDED PROPOSAL

I maintain my objection to the amended proposal and make the following supplementary submission in response to the re-exhibited application for a 19 story block on the site. Whilst I share the needs for increased housing in principle, to obstruct and reduce the living enjoyment of most surrounding residents goes against the shared facility principles.
I am the owner of apartment at 5-15 Farrell Avenue and a long term owner within the building. My apartment is located on Level 4 of the building and enjoys extensive views across to iconic landmarks and water views via garden island . Please see attached photo for reference of the views enjoyed from all aspects of my apartment to the iconic landmarks.

I specifically object to:
1. Increased significant height of application causing even further view construction than was previously considered - above that which is allowable within that part of the street
2. Lack of photo assessment of view affect on my property, which extend to direct landmark views of Opera House, Bridge etc . Lack of verified photomontages and a dwelling-specific view-sharing assessment for apartment levels.

I have owned this apartment since 2006 and chose the apartment primarily for the great outlook and sweeping full views of the Sydney Harbour Bridge and Opera House. I also paid a large premium for an apartment with this view. This has immensely improved the amenity of the apartment and I have spent many happy, sociable hours on the balcony admiring the view. My apartment and its view is something I am proud of and have enjoyed both on my own and with a variety of social situations.

The apartment currently enjoys the amenity of a full, unobstructed view of the Opera House and Bridge from
1. both balconies,
2. kitchen window and
3. both bedroom windows.
4. Sitting / Dining area

The iconic view is visible from standing and seated position and visible both inside living space and outside on the balconies. I also enjoy some water views across William Street to garden Island area.

I am hereby objecting to the proposed development for the following reasons :

1. Devastating obstruction of 100% of the view : from the all areas of the apartment – the development will completely block both the Opera House and Bridge from my view, as well as some water view and associated green aspect of the view .
2. The devastating view obstruction will be present from both balconies, bedrooms, kitchen: both standing and sitting
3. For the development – the request for additional density by way of an ‘envelope’ and not a specific form will have an extreme impact on many residents view
4. Height with the envelope, the maximum height for the site by which I made a decision to buy the apartment has been exceeded.– this being represented by the turret on the nearby Avis building – note that I am not against redevelopment of the block, but wish for the devastating loss of iconic view to be removed from the many apartments in Farrell Avenue and other nearby blocks, caused by additional density request within the envelope.
5. No reference to or allowance for the heritage nature or character of existing buildings in that part of William Street that fronts on to the heritage area of Woolloomooloo

I believe that this is not just a reduction in shared view, but a devastating loss of 100% of view for myself and many of the apartments in the 5-15 Farrell Avenue block and associated blocks located in the surrounding streets .

To support this submission, I enclose the following:

1. A number of photographs from around the apartment. All are from the standing position and are both indoors and outdoors views.

I look forward to the development application being reconsidered and seek to design and protect views in accordance with equitable sharing and equity planning principles so that the view impacts can be properly assessed and impact on the locality amenity is reduced to an acceptable level.

I have concerns about the amount of traffic and congestion that will result. It is currently particularly awkward to access our the Marquis building given how the various road lanes travel and the traffic that builds up, especially turning right onto William Street from Crown Street. The inclusion of a privately owned public car park seems to be excluded from the gross floor space allocation. This seems to give the developers more apartment space and more height by not counting the GFS of the car park.

Traffic is horrendous already. More people, more cars, more pollution, more congestion. William street at the best of times is gridlocked ,by bringing more people into the area will exacerbate the situation. Plus food delivery bikes will increase. It is extremely dangerous for pedestrians now as they ride on the footpaths with no regard for safety. The village atmosphere of Darlinghurst and Woolloomooloo will disappear and it will be a high ghetto. No to the increase of size of the development.

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am a local resident living near Mowbray Park and close to the Lane Cove River. This area is valued for its combination of residential neighbourhoods, parkland, and natural surroundings. I would like to share some concerns regarding the proposed data centre at 6–8 Julius Avenue.

1. Impact on Residential Amenity
As the facility is expected to operate continuously, I am concerned about potential noise from cooling systems, mechanical equipment, and backup generators. While I understand such infrastructure is necessary, it would be helpful to ensure that noise impacts—particularly at night—are carefully managed. The area already experiences a noticeable level of aircraft noise, so any additional noise sources may further affect residents’ amenity.

2. Environmental Considerations
Given the proximity to the Lane Cove River and nearby green spaces, I hope that any potential impacts on water quality, vegetation, and local wildlife are thoroughly assessed and mitigated. Protecting these natural assets is important to the community.

3. Visual and Local Character
The surrounding area includes residential properties and recreational spaces such as Mowbray Park. It would be appreciated if the design and scale of the development are carefully considered to ensure it integrates as well as possible with the existing character.

4. Longer-Term Considerations
I also encourage careful consideration of how this development fits within the broader planning vision for the area, including any potential cumulative impacts over time.

Overall, I respectfully request that these matters be carefully addressed in the assessment process, and that appropriate conditions be applied to minimise impacts on residents and the local environment.

Thank you for taking the time to consider my submission.

Regards,
Jaejun Woo

This data base is a big industrial block which will use too much electricity and water. It takes away from greenspace and public amenity.

From my background as a foundation member of Friends of Lane Cove Natioal Park in 1994; and as a private citizen who has known the area of the DA since 1952; as well as being a retired former part-time Bush Regeneration employee of Lane Cove National Park fro 1997 -2018; as well as a retired teacher of Bush Regeneration at Ryde College TAFE; I make the attached objection to the DA as it has been submitted by BDAR.
As a private citizen and from my private professional knowledge and background and I am well qualified to ask for revisions to the proposed DA.
My own qualifacations are a Diploma in Phys Ed, 1954 at Sydney Teachers College; BA. Macquarie Uni (1971), where I majored in Land Management and Ecology. I also studied Town and Country Planning at Sydney Uni. in 1972-74.

Please find my submission in the attached PDF

As a Bushcare volunteer working with NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, I have a strong interest in the protection and long-term management of local bushland. The amended proposal continues to present unresolved risks in this regard.

The Vegetation Management Plan referenced in the BDAR should be imposed as a condition of consent and developed in consultation with NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service and local Bushcare groups. Ongoing implementation should be subject to regular, transparent reporting to ensure accountability. This also includes the construction period, where clearly defined and enforceable safeguards, including exclusion zones, physical barriers, and independent monitoring will be particularly important.

The Voluntary Planning Agreement currently relies on a financial contribution to Council, with limited demonstrated benefit to the adjoining bushland. Tree plantings should be enforced with a minimum 3:1 replacement ratio. Generally speaking, greater weight should be given to direct, ongoing support for bushland management, including partnerships with NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service and community Bushcare programs. Such commitments should be secured and binding on all future site owners.