The size of this planned build is not in keeping with its surrounds. Not to mention the impact on the surrounding properties and the chaos in terms of parking and traffic doesn’t bear thinking about.
The size of this development needs to be significantly reduced.

This project would damage the lifestyle of which makes Narrabeen and the Northern Beaches so valuable. I object to this project with the aim of protecting the area that locals love and cherish.

This area is low level housing, has no extra traffic in place to facilitate these extra units and the extreme digging for the underground parking is not feasible in the coastal location.

The development is not in keeping with the local area which has 2-3 storey buildings. 6 stories is too high and on such a large development will have a huge impact on local residential streets and add to parking congestion.

Dear Secretary,

I am writing to formally object to the proposed development SSD-76220734 at 156 Ocean Street, Narrabeen. As a resident of North Narrabeen who frequents Ocean Street daily, I have significant concerns about the impacts this development would have on our local community and environment.

Firstly, traffic congestion in the area is already a serious issue, particularly during school hours and weekends. The proposed development would substantially increase vehicle movements along Ocean Street and adjoining roads, worsening bottlenecks and making access for local residents increasingly difficult.

Secondly, the scale and design of the proposal are inconsistent with the existing neighbourhood character. Ocean Street and its surrounding precinct are defined by their coastal village charm and low-rise residential appeal. Introducing a large-scale development of this nature would irreversibly alter the visual and social fabric of the area.

Additionally, the proposed height and massing are likely to cause overshadowing of nearby buildings and public spaces, reducing natural light for surrounding homes and negatively impacting residential amenity.

I am also deeply concerned about pedestrian safety, particularly for students from nearby schools who regularly walk or cycle in this area. Increased traffic volumes and construction activity would create unsafe conditions for these vulnerable road users.

Overall, the proposal would place an unnecessary burden on the entire community; from traffic and infrastructure strain to the loss of the neighbourhood character that makes Narrabeen such a valued and livable part of Sydney’s Northern Beaches.

For these reasons, I strongly urge the Department to refuse the development application SSD-76220734 at 156 Ocean Street, Narrabeen.

Thank you for considering my submission.

Kind Regards,
Brendon Swift

Att: Secretary, DPHI - Objection to SSD-76220734 – 156 Ocean Street Narrabeen.
J
I am a local resident of the Northern Beaches residing in Warriewood and am concerned for the proposed development noted above for the following reasons: 1. Incompatibility to the area - One of the main concerns is the height and scale of the proposed development - it is well above anything else in the immediate area - if you are to drive around the area there is not one other building that reaches above four stories until you get to Waterloo St near the shopping precinct. This proposed development is not unlike building a small Westfield shopping centre in the middle of a residential neighbourhood - completely out of character.
2. The over shadowing on neighbours is also surely outside of the local planning laws. The fact that the ‘cheapest’ apartment is $3 million dollars is also a shock. Who is the target market here ? There is no way this project fits into any kind of affordable housing scheme. With 149 apartments proposed for this site - that would equate to at least 292 cars for that development alone.
3. I also don’t believe that adequate parking has been allowed for. Nor can the local area cater for an influx of humans like that. I am not able to get a park at the local (Narrabeen) Woolworths at midday on a weekday - imagine the weekend !

So to summarise, I believe the development is too big, unfitting for our area, way too tall, overshadows existing residents and prices out future generations within the area. I am not sure at all why it shouldn’t have to abide by the local planning laws and why it should be exempt ?

I am sorry to say but I believe It is a money maker for developers that have no concern whatsoever for the local area and communities they are destroying with their oversized and overpriced developments.

Why are developers / the minority / with deep pockets allowed to mask their project applications with suggestions of affordable living, over 55’s etc in order to get the plans approved yet the families and the community within the area they are destroying - their complaints fall on deaf ears.

All we hear is that government need to meet housing quota’s yet hundreds of thousands of resident entry visa’s are granted each year in Australia and no one is thinking about where they will live ?

How about our government - the persons who have put their hands up to manage this beautiful incredible country we are so fortunate to live in come up with better solutions than to grant these greedy money hungry developers the right to destroy communities as a quick fix to the lack of planning and forethought.

Please do not allow this to go ahead - this needs more time to properly consider the local community and consult with the local committees and come up with a solution EVERYONE is happy with.

Thank you for your time. Best Regards, Jo Ross

To Whom It May Concern,

I am writing to formally oppose the proposed development in our neighbourhood. As a resident and family living on Lagoon Street, I am deeply concerned about the lasting impacts this project will have on our community, environment, and overall safety.

Firstly, the planned removal of mature native pine trees represents a significant environmental loss. These trees are not only part of the area’s natural character but also provide habitat for local wildlife, shade, and erosion protection. Their removal would permanently alter the landscape and diminish the ecological value of our neighbourhood.

Secondly, the proposed structure—reaching heights of up to 20 metres—constitutes a clear case of overdevelopment. It will dominate the local skyline, create visual obstruction for hundreds of residents, and fundamentally change the look and feel of our community. The scale is inconsistent with existing dwellings and the established character of Lagoon Street.

Traffic and safety are also serious concerns. Lagoon Street and the surrounding roads are not designed to handle the additional volume of vehicles that a development of this magnitude will generate. Increased congestion, parking pressures, and potential safety hazards for pedestrians—especially children—are inevitable.

Equally troubling is the lack of genuine community consultation. Many residents feel excluded from the decision-making process, with limited opportunities to provide meaningful input or understand the full scope of the development. A project of this scale demands transparent, inclusive engagement with the local community.

Finally, the site’s Aboriginal heritage sensitivity must be respected. Any development in this area should be approached with cultural awareness and proper consultation with Traditional Custodians before approval is considered.

In summary, this proposal threatens to erode the environmental, cultural, and social integrity of our neighbourhood. It is out of scale, environmentally damaging, and not in keeping with the community values that make this area so special. I urge the Council to reject this application and work with residents to explore more sustainable, appropriately scaled alternatives.

Sincerely,
Jacqueline Kirk
Lagoon Street Resident

It does not support the community and will create big problems for traffic and become an eye sore and ruin the landscape. Narrabeen is not Dee Why and it should stay that way.

I strongly oppose the proposed Indigo by Moran seniors’ housing development at 156 Ocean Street, Narrabeen. I am a local Narrabeen resident and I use the streets around the area daily. I respectfully request that the NSW Department of Planning refuse the current application or require a comprehensive redesign to ensure compliance with local planning controls and alignment with community expectations.

Coastal and Flooding Risk

The proposed site lies within a known flood-prone and coastal erosion hazard area, as outlined in the EIS Appendices E & F (Flood and Coastal Hazard Reports). The development footprint extends into zones identified as high hazard under the Northern Beaches Council Flood Study and Coastal Zone Management Plan.

While the EIS acknowledges these risks, it fails to provide adequate mitigation strategies beyond basic floor height adjustments. These measures do not sufficiently address Narrabeen’s increasing exposure to coastal erosion, sea level rise, and storm surge events, rendering the proposal inconsistent with sustainable coastal planning principles.

Traffic, Parking and Access

The Traffic and Parking Assessment (EIS Appendix J) significantly underestimates vehicle movements and parking demands generated by residents, staff, service vehicles, and visitors. Ocean Street and Lagoon Street are already under pressure from high traffic volumes, particularly during weekends, holidays and local events. I am concerned about the safety of my children and others walking or riding their bikes to and from the beach along these roads.

The addition of a large seniors’ living complex will further exacerbate congestion, reduce pedestrian and cyclist safety, and impede emergency vehicle access. There is a kindergarten present in the area and the surrounding narrow streets are not designed to accommodate the anticipated increase in traffic and parking demand.

Height, Scale and Visual Impact

The proposed building substantially exceeds the height and bulk envisioned for this sensitive coastal setting. The Visual Impact Assessment (EIS Appendix L) confirms the development would dominate the low-scale residential character of Ocean Street and obstruct key public view corridors.

The five-storey design is inconsistent with the existing built form and surrounding natural environment, creating a sense of enclosure, visual intrusion, and loss of open sky for neighbouring properties and public spaces. I am particularly concerned about the loss of light in the area and the eye-sore that this building will create.

Vegetation Loss and Biodiversity

The Arboricultural Impact Assessment (EIS Appendix H) identifies the planned removal of over 30 mature trees and established vegetation. These trees play a vital role in maintaining local shade, biodiversity, and coastal resilience. Their loss will degrade wildlife corridors, reduce canopy cover essential for urban cooling, and further erode the area’s ecological integrity.

Replacement landscaping cannot compensate for the loss of mature specimens, nor restore the environmental and visual values currently provided by existing vegetation.

Overshadowing, Privacy and Amenity Impacts

The building’s excessive height and footprint will cause substantial overshadowing and privacy loss for adjoining properties. As demonstrated in the Architectural and Shadow Diagrams (EIS Appendix – Figures 5.3–5.5), shadowing extends beyond site boundaries between 9am and 3pm in winter, severely impacting private open spaces and living areas of nearby dwellings.

This contravenes solar access requirements under Clause 6.9 of the Pittwater LEP 2014.
Furthermore, elevated terraces and balconies will overlook neighbouring yards, directly breaching Residential Flat Design Code (RFDC) visual privacy objectives.

Additional Localised Adverse Impacts

Construction disruption: Extended excavation, piling, and increased traffic will significantly impact nearby residents and park users.

Wind tunnelling: The building’s large scale and coastal exposure may create wind turbulence, posing risks to pedestrian comfort and safety.

Infrastructure strain: Flood-prone drainage and sewer systems may become overwhelmed.

Emergency access: Narrow streets and limited exit routes increase risks during flood or storm events.

Cumulative precedent: Approval would set an undesirable precedent for further oversized developments in Narrabeen’s fragile coastal corridor.


The Indigo by Moran proposal is fundamentally incompatible with the principles of sustainable, context-sensitive development for the Northern Beaches. It presents excessive bulk, unacceptable amenity and environmental risks, and long-term consequences for the community and local ecosystems.

Against high rise development on the beaches