State Significant Development
Sancrox Quarry Expansion Project
Port Macquarie-Hastings
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
The proposal seeks to extend the life of the quarry by expanding the current extraction boundary, increasing the annual extraction limits, and establish associated infrastructure. IPC link: https://www.ipcn.nsw.gov.au/
Attachments & Resources
Notice of Exhibition (1)
Request for SEARs (1)
SEARs (2)
EIS (13)
Engagement (3)
Response to Submissions (14)
Agency Advice (22)
Amendments (10)
Additional Information (55)
Recommendation (3)
Determination (2)
Approved Documents
There are no post approval documents available
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
20/07/2022
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
3 Sons Pty Ltd
Object
3 Sons Pty Ltd
James Dunn
Comment
James Dunn
Message
Attachments
Expressway Spares
Object
Expressway Spares
Message
Attachments
Nial Jewson
Object
Nial Jewson
Message
The proposed quarry will once again cut into the regions already heavily compromised native vegetation corridor connectivity. A death of a 1000 cuts seems to be Port Macquaries legacy if we don’t stop this unfettered exploitation of the region.
The suggestion that this real and tangible habitat in the Sancrox area can be bulldozed and somehow ‘off-set’ or mitigated by paying into a fund is beyond farcical. Once this habitat is gone, its gone. No amount of offsetting will change that. In addition, it is recorded in the Biodiversity assessment report many hollow baring trees will be destroyed within the Spotted Gum - Grey Ironbark open forest association. This does not fall within the offset area, as such there seems to be no provision to consider the loss of hollow bearing arboreal habitat.
The 24/7 operational schedule seems to be punishing for wildlife and residents alike. The already stressed surviving fauna, post bulldozing, will be subjected to the noise, dust and light pollution of a busy quarry everyday of the year for the next 30 years. An insult to injury that will certainly change the areas fauna for ever.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
The quarry has not been a concern since its establishment, and with the surrounding forest, we have rarely noticed its impact on the local area. However, due to the topography of the land between the highway (and existing quarry) and our property, 7 kms away, on the rare occasions when Cassegrain Winery hosts a musical function we have definitely been impacted by the noise. Hence my deep concern at the prospect of expanded 24 hour quarry operations, seven days a week in addition to the additional proposed concrete batching and asphalt production plants. Given that there are existing plants in the region, which already supply these materials, I fail to understand why such an expansion should be considered necessary at all.
Of greatest concern to me is the impact on the native vegetation and habitat in this area. Over the past 30 years, I have seen the gradual destruction of much native forest vegetation, with large amounts of land recently denuded for the construction of the Pacific Motorway. While I acknowledge the necessity of some development, the Greater Sancrox Area Structure Plan has identified the land to be cleared as medium to high activity koala habitat.
We observed the impact on the local koala habitat during the construction of the motorway with a significant increase in koalas moving to a small pocket of forest near us. We fear that this area will be insufficient to sustain the increased numbers that may have to migrate due to the proposed quarry development, with the consequent destruction of over 43 hectares of native forest vegetation.
I am sure you have received submissions detailing many studies which describe the impact not only on koalas but other native vegetation and wildlife, however as a long term local, I can testify as to the actual real impact of these developments. In addition, given the severe and prolonged drought in our area, and the subsequent catastrophic fires in large areas of native vegetation on the Mid North Coast, I do not believe we should legitimately sacrifice further habitat, when other options are available.
While I acknowledge that there is an “Ecosystem Credit” system paid by developers to offset the recognised destruction of our local native vegetation and the habitat of our local threatened species should this development be approved, this will not help our local flora and fauna after the permanent destruction of their native environment.
Peter and Anne Beaumont
Object
Peter and Anne Beaumont
Message
1. Cover letter Sancrox Quarry Objection
2. Beaumont Certificate of title
3. Report of King & Campbell (the following attachments refer to this report) "McMullen Submission"
4. "Attachment 1 - Aerial Proposed Quarry"
5. "Attachment 2 North West proposed Quarry"
6. "A3 Except Biolink Sancrox Eco Assessment 2011"
7 "Attachment 4 Groundwater Investigations"
8. "Photos McMullen Land drainage"
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Port Macquarie is a unique and vibrant area - tourists come to visit because of our environmental beauty and wild life, and families come to live here for the same reasons. These are the characteristics that attract people to our area. Don’t allow developers to destroy everything that makes this region great - the kolas are our icon and we need to work together to protect them.
Attachments
Jake Wadsworth
Object
Jake Wadsworth
Message
Simone Bowskill
Object
Simone Bowskill
Message
1. The unacceptably high level of CO2-e emissions over the project lifecycle
2. The loss of native forest vegetation, including an EEC and 43ha of core koala habitat, which will adversely impact local biodiversity
(a) As a consequence of the recent fires, no more koala habitat should be cleared.
(b) There will be destruction of an identified critical link needed to maintain vegetation connectivity for animal movement
(c) The development will divert a native flora and fauna watercourse to industrial use
3. The inadequate offsetting strategy:
(a) offsetting with a vegetation association (Paperbark) that does not occur in the development site and paying into a fund (i.e. locating the remainder of the offset area anywhere in NSW and not within the local community).
(b) not generating koala ecosystem credits despite the presence of PCT1265 in the development site
(c) of the vegetation associations identified in the project area, two are not included in the proposed offset area
4. Potential significant local noise pollution from proposed 24/7 operations
I understand that Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd were fined $15,000 in 2016 for breaching the conditions of its Environment Protection Licence at the Sancrox Quarry. The fine highlights a flagrant disregard for environmental considerations by this business and an inherent/proven “untrustworthiness” of this business being given approval for further development in this sensitive area.
Caitlin Creak
Object
Caitlin Creak
Message
The project includes “clearing 43.1 hectares of native forest vegetation, 0.55 ha of which is identified as the threatened ecological community Subtropical coastal floodplain forest (NR117)” with serious and irreversible environmental impact. (Ref: DA, Annex C)
During November 2019 a State of Emergency was declared in NSW due to the catastrophic bushfires. Hundreds of koalas may have been killed. Injured and now homeless koalas may migrate to, or have to be moved onto, the proposed development site.
The Greater Sancrox Area Structure Plan (Port Macquarie Hastings Council, 2014), identifies the land to be cleared as medium to high activity koala habitat. More recently the Draft Coastal Koala Plan of Management 2018 (CKPOM) produced by PMHC identifies the area as core koala habitat. The clearing also destroys an identified critical link needed to maintain vegetation connectivity for animal movement.
Insufficient field work was conducted in 2015, four years ago. A major flaw of the EIS is that it fails to record koalas at six locations and the presence of habitat critical to the endangered Swift Parrot. (Refs: Office of Environment and Heritage Records, 2008 -2013; Ref. DA Annex C)
The environmental impact is serious and irreversible. The proposed development site supports unique biodiversity with a total of 27 threatened species identified so far, including 17 birds and 9 mammals, including 7 vulnerable bats. The native vegetation on site should be retained to combat Australia’s abysmal record of extinction of plants and animals in Australia. (Ref. https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/topics/animals-and-plants/native-vegetation/why-is-native-vegetation-important)
Proposed “Ecosystem credits” system of payment by the developer to offset destruction of threatened species does not compensate for the serious and irreversible impact on the natural environment.
Native vegetation in NSW stores a significant amount of carbon. This deforestation and forest degradation will contribute to global greenhouse gas emissions and fewer trees in a region can contribute to drought by reducing the amount of local rainfall.
The natural water on the site, currently supporting native flora and fauna, will be diverted to industrial use and North and west alluvial flood plains of the Hastings River and Haydons Creek will be impacted.
The company operating this site has a poor track record of environmental compliance and were fined $15,000 by the Environmental Protection Authority in 2016 for breaches of their water management operational obligations. (Ref: EPA 24.03.2016).
The proposed works impact Aboriginal heritage sites, including a Scar Tree and ceremonial site of “high cultural significance.” (Ref: Annex D, Heritage Report)
Daniel Creak
Object
Daniel Creak
Message
The project includes “clearing 43.1 hectares of native forest vegetation, 0.55 ha of which is identified as the threatened ecological community Subtropical coastal floodplain forest (NR117)” with serious and irreversible environmental impact. (Ref: DA, Annex C)
During November 2019 a State of Emergency was declared in NSW due to the catastrophic bushfires. Hundreds of koalas may have been killed. Injured and now homeless koalas may migrate to, or have to be moved onto, the proposed development site.
The Greater Sancrox Area Structure Plan (Port Macquarie Hastings Council, 2014), identifies the land to be cleared as medium to high activity koala habitat. More recently the Draft Coastal Koala Plan of Management 2018 (CKPOM) produced by PMHC identifies the area as core koala habitat. The clearing also destroys an identified critical link needed to maintain vegetation connectivity for animal movement.
Insufficient field work was conducted in 2015, four years ago. A major flaw of the EIS is that it fails to record koalas at six locations and the presence of habitat critical to the endangered Swift Parrot. (Refs: Office of Environment and Heritage Records, 2008 -2013; Ref. DA Annex C)
The environmental impact is serious and irreversible. The proposed development site supports unique biodiversity with a total of 27 threatened species identified so far, including 17 birds and 9 mammals, including 7 vulnerable bats. The native vegetation on site should be retained to combat Australia’s abysmal record of extinction of plants and animals in Australia. (Ref. https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/topics/animals-and-plants/native-vegetation/why-is-native-vegetation-important)
Proposed “Ecosystem credits” system of payment by the developer to offset destruction of threatened species does not compensate for the serious and irreversible impact on the natural environment.
Native vegetation in NSW stores a significant amount of carbon. This deforestation and forest degradation will contribute to global greenhouse gas emissions and fewer trees in a region can contribute to drought by reducing the amount of local rainfall.
The natural water on the site, currently supporting native flora and fauna, will be diverted to industrial use and North and west alluvial flood plains of the Hastings River and Haydons Creek will be impacted.
The company operating this site has a poor track record of environmental compliance and were fined $15,000 by the Environmental Protection Authority in 2016 for breaches of their water management operational obligations. (Ref: EPA 24.03.2016).
The proposed works impact Aboriginal heritage sites, including a Scar Tree and ceremonial site of “high cultural significance.” (Ref: Annex D, Heritage Report)