Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Hurlstone Park
,
New South Wales
Message
Please see attached document
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
HURLSTONE PARK
,
New South Wales
Message
As attached
Attachments
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Support
Haymarket
,
New South Wales
Message
I fully support the submission. This infrastructure investment is long
overdue and will provide a significant benefit to residents.
overdue and will provide a significant benefit to residents.
CRK Properties
Support
CRK Properties
Support
Double Bay
,
New South Wales
Message
We are land owners in Canterbury and Belmore, having purchased there on
the back of the Metro Southwest commitment.
We believe strongly in the vision and what is will do for the area, in
regards to transport and urban renewal.
Thank you for listening to community feedback and please proceed with
the vision!
the back of the Metro Southwest commitment.
We believe strongly in the vision and what is will do for the area, in
regards to transport and urban renewal.
Thank you for listening to community feedback and please proceed with
the vision!
Michael Katz
Support
Michael Katz
Support
Darlinghurs
,
New South Wales
Message
This is a great initiative and outcome.
I live in an apartment in the city and because I am near transport it
works. We need more of this in the second ring of Sydney.
Thank you also for listening to the people and improving the process
and project.
I live in an apartment in the city and because I am near transport it
works. We need more of this in the second ring of Sydney.
Thank you also for listening to the people and improving the process
and project.
Margo Cashman
Comment
Margo Cashman
Comment
Dulwich Hill
,
New South Wales
Message
Good morning,
It was good to see the Transport NSW Team on Saturday 30th at
Marrickville, thank you for sharing your time on a Saturday with the
local community.
The `Six Streets' Team has been reviewing the Preferred Infrastructure
Report and we do have a few questions on noise impacts outlined in the
report.
Given that the Albermarle Bridge and embankment works are no longer
happening and the existing platform is remaining rather than being
removed we were surprised that Dulwich Hill appears to be the most
noise affected of the local areas
The table below indicates that 125 residences are nominated as being
as being so noise affected that they will be provided with alternative
accommodation
Volume 1 of the Preferred Infrastructure report June 2018
Table 15.5 (p545)
Based on the maps below, homes which are in the green or yellow/orange
zones, which includes most homes in the Six Streets, are in danger of
having their sleep disturbed. The green or yellow/orange zones shows
homes which will suffer noise greater than 50 decibels at night
(10pm-7am)
Appendix E: Noise and Vibration assessment
Daytime noise (P110)
Night time noise (P120)
We have 4 issues we would like to raise
We understand that the Dulwich Hill recorded background noise is 33
decibels.
The EPA say people's sleep gets disturbed when there is a rise of 15
decibels above the background noise they are used to - in the case of
Dulwich Hill that is 48 decibels.
So in theory if you are in the green, yellow or orange zone you are at
50+ decibels so would be sleep disturbed.
Our understanding is that rather than 15 decibels, the Metro deems 30
decibels above the background noise as causing sleep disturbance
On this basis, if you are in the yellow zone on the map below- you
have the potential for alternative accommodation, in the blue zone you
are monitored
The main issue is how many nights will the noise levels be at these
high levels?
Given these concerns, we have four questions that we would like your
feedback on
1. Why is noise impact on Dulwich Hill so much higher than other
areas?
2. Is there anywhere in the Preferred Infrastructure Report which
shows how many days and nights are planned at these high noise levels?
If not, can they please provide us an indication of the total days and
nights of high noise impact, even if they can't tell us the schedule
yet?
3. What is the process for both offering alternative accommodation,
and advising residents on the noise impacts, e.g. how much notice are
we given on when the noise will occur?
4. If the monitoring finds higher noise impacts, what happens then?
Are there temporary noise mitigation measures that can be put in place
like window, screens etc. for those who want them?
If you could please clarify the above issues as soon as possible that
would be much appreciated
We thank you again for your ongoing assistance in helping us
understand and plan for the impact that the Metro will have on
residents.
Kind regards
Margo Cashman
It was good to see the Transport NSW Team on Saturday 30th at
Marrickville, thank you for sharing your time on a Saturday with the
local community.
The `Six Streets' Team has been reviewing the Preferred Infrastructure
Report and we do have a few questions on noise impacts outlined in the
report.
Given that the Albermarle Bridge and embankment works are no longer
happening and the existing platform is remaining rather than being
removed we were surprised that Dulwich Hill appears to be the most
noise affected of the local areas
The table below indicates that 125 residences are nominated as being
as being so noise affected that they will be provided with alternative
accommodation
Volume 1 of the Preferred Infrastructure report June 2018
Table 15.5 (p545)
Based on the maps below, homes which are in the green or yellow/orange
zones, which includes most homes in the Six Streets, are in danger of
having their sleep disturbed. The green or yellow/orange zones shows
homes which will suffer noise greater than 50 decibels at night
(10pm-7am)
Appendix E: Noise and Vibration assessment
Daytime noise (P110)
Night time noise (P120)
We have 4 issues we would like to raise
We understand that the Dulwich Hill recorded background noise is 33
decibels.
The EPA say people's sleep gets disturbed when there is a rise of 15
decibels above the background noise they are used to - in the case of
Dulwich Hill that is 48 decibels.
So in theory if you are in the green, yellow or orange zone you are at
50+ decibels so would be sleep disturbed.
Our understanding is that rather than 15 decibels, the Metro deems 30
decibels above the background noise as causing sleep disturbance
On this basis, if you are in the yellow zone on the map below- you
have the potential for alternative accommodation, in the blue zone you
are monitored
The main issue is how many nights will the noise levels be at these
high levels?
Given these concerns, we have four questions that we would like your
feedback on
1. Why is noise impact on Dulwich Hill so much higher than other
areas?
2. Is there anywhere in the Preferred Infrastructure Report which
shows how many days and nights are planned at these high noise levels?
If not, can they please provide us an indication of the total days and
nights of high noise impact, even if they can't tell us the schedule
yet?
3. What is the process for both offering alternative accommodation,
and advising residents on the noise impacts, e.g. how much notice are
we given on when the noise will occur?
4. If the monitoring finds higher noise impacts, what happens then?
Are there temporary noise mitigation measures that can be put in place
like window, screens etc. for those who want them?
If you could please clarify the above issues as soon as possible that
would be much appreciated
We thank you again for your ongoing assistance in helping us
understand and plan for the impact that the Metro will have on
residents.
Kind regards
Margo Cashman