Like all wind plantations, Burrendong is not fit for purpose as, without back up, it cannot provide power 24/7; and when current roof top solar is producing more than enough on either side of noon in the summer, so much so, and scandalously, that wind plantations like Burrendong already have to be paid NOT to produce electricity.
The claims that wind can produce cheaper power than fossil fuels are based on the utterly misleading Levelised Cost Analysis which ignores three enormous costs of back up;
1: The cost of construction of back up during wind lulls which can last several days (currently fossil fuel/ aka gas and coal)
2: The cost of having the back-up plant on standby when it is not needed; who would finance and build a nuclear power plant that did not produce power 24/7?
3: The cost of infrastructure to take the power from where it is being made, in the pristine hill tops of our forested great dividing range, to where it is needed in or near big cities. Fossil fuel and nuclear plants are built near the source of supply and are part of the existing grid.
No fiscally aware government should permit unreliable renewables that are unfit for purpose as they do not come with adequate back up-power as part of the package.
Think again dear Nestor, please.
Regards

I object to the Burrendong Wind project. Please see my objection attached.

I object to this project because it will be an ugly addition to the rural landscape. it will also impact local economy in a negative way. As someone who works in a small rural supplies store, renewable energy developments such as these will ultimately close down businesses. protect rural NSW communities! protect the koala habitat that is located where the Burrendong wind farm intends to be built!

I, Ajay Corvera, a member of Burrendong SOS, hereby express my objection and refusal to consent to the adverse impacts of the Burrendong Wind Farm proposal on our community and surrounding landscape. If constructed, the proposed wind farm, particularly turbine Nos 49, 50, and 53 to 61, will have an unacceptable cumulative visual impact on the Worlds End Ridgeline, a high-quality landscape feature equivalent to coastal ocean views.

I request the removal of the specified turbines from the proposal to preserve the scenic quality of the Worlds End Ridgeline, shielding the highest density of dwellings from adverse visual impacts from the project. The existing Landscape Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) produced by Moir Landscape Architects (Moir LA) is biased, false, and misleading, serving the financial interests of Ark Energy and Moir LA rather than accurately assessing the project's impact.

Key concerns include:

The LVIA's failure to identify over 30 dwellings within 5km of the project site for impact analysis and the omission of properties with dwelling entitlements within the same radius.
The exclusion of the Piambong Wind Farm proposal from the Multiple Wind Turbine Tool analysis, violating requirements of the Wind Energy Visual Assessment Bulletin and Cumulative Impact Assessment Guideline for State Significant Development.
Intentional misrepresentation of individual dwelling assessments, exemplified by Dwelling U8-1, such as this dwelling being located within 3.35km not 4km from turbine No.53 and the fact that turbines will be seen in 3x 60 degree sectors (including from the Piambong Wind Farm) not 1 x 60 degree sector - indicating a need for independent review.
Lack of consideration for the high scenic quality of the Worlds End Ridgeline, which is located in a C3 Environmental Management zone that objectives strive to protect its ecological, scientific, cultural, and aesthetic values.
Disregard for the fact that the highest density of properties and dwellings located immediately to the east and north-east of the project site are predominantly LIFESTYLE PROPERTIES, not agricultural, and the fact that the proposal involving 250m high industrial scale turbines, spinning with flashing lights proposed to tower over 1/2km into the air above the relative level of several dwellings in LCU07 - Worlds End, will undermine the reason people chose to purchase their properties, live and visit the area (e.g. relative isolation, peace and quiet, natural outlooks towards the majestic Worlds End Ridgeline, enjoyment of the dark night sky - star gazing and being at one with nature, away from the fast pace city life and out of reception).
Deficient community engagement, with non-associated landowners not adequately notified, resulting in a lack of fair input and questionable Visual Impact Assessment survey responses.
Criminal deception in Ark Energy via Moir Landscape Architects accessing land for the agreed purpose of providing photomontages - which where never provided to several landowners. And a general lack of social license, creating distress for the impacted community.
A suggesting the landscaping to screen views from dwellings to the Worlds End Ridgeline (similar to screening ocean views for coastal dwellers) is a fair and legitimate visual impact mitigation solution. The fact non-associated adversely impacted surrounding landowners have not been approached with any offers of financial compensation that I am aware of.
The Worlds End Valley has a significant Echo effect. This has not been acknowledged nor addressed in the Noise Impact Assessment (NIA). Also, the NIA fails to assess noise impacts on over 30 dwellings missing from the assessment map. I do not consent to future nuisance noise emanating from turbines, that has potential to prevent me from having a good night sleep with associated health impacts.
Burrendong SOS will look to pursue a class action for any adverse impacts resulting from this wind farm.
Concerns about the impact on biodiversity, particularly the potential harm to the Wedge Tail Eagle population (Apex predator for the region), a species of cultural significance to the local Wiradjuri People (one of their totem animals). Concern for the red tail black cockatoo population that frequents the Worlds End Valley (we have feathers collected to prove their existence). Concern for micro bats (pollinators) that call the area home (we have video footage of these), knowing that changes in barometric pressure from turbines can exploding their internal organs leading to the demise of their population. Also unknown impact on the local Koala population, noting Burrendong is in fact an Aboriginal name for Koala! - Koala's communicate via a low frequency mating call and turbines also emit low frequency noise - will this impact their ability to find a mate? Will the noise and lighting on turbines push nocturnal animals such as the sugar glider and koala out of the area? Development of this proposal should not proceed until independent studies are conducted to answer these questions.
I call for the NSW Department of Planning and Environment (DPE) to commission an independent Landscape Visual Impact Assessment; independent Biodiversity Impact Assessment; and an independent Noise Impact Assessment to address the aforementioned concerns, and uphold legal assessment requirements (particularly with respect to the definition of a dwelling for assessment purposes) to prevent a gross jurisdictional error with regard to the assessment of this proposal. Additionally, I strongly advocate for the removal of turbine Nos 49, 50, 53 to 61 from the proposal as a viable mitigation option to eliminate cumulative visual impacts.

I am writing to express my strong objection to the proposed Burrendong Wind Farm, as outlined in the recent project proposal. My family has owned property at World End for almost 50 years, and we have enjoyed the quiet and peaceful surroundings during our regular camping holidays. I am deeply concerned about the potential negative impacts that the wind farm could have on our cherished property and the surrounding environment.

Firstly, I am apprehensive about the widespread destruction of animal habitat that may result from the construction and operation of the wind farm. The delicate ecosystem and diverse wildlife in the area are integral to the natural beauty and serenity we have come to appreciate over the years. I fear that the project may disrupt these habitats, causing irreversible harm to the local fauna.

Moreover, the interruption of quiet enjoyment during our camping holidays is a significant concern. The tranquil atmosphere of World End has been a retreat for my family, providing a much-needed escape from the noise and bustle of urban life. The presence of a wind farm, with its associated noise and visual impact, threatens to compromise the peaceful ambiance we have cherished for decades.

Additionally, I am worried about the potential devaluation of property in the area. The visual impact of the wind farm could adversely affect property values, diminishing the appeal of the region for both residents and potential buyers. This decline in property values could have lasting economic consequences for property owners, including my family.

Finally, I anticipate significant traffic issues associated with the construction and maintenance of the wind farm. The influx of heavy machinery, construction vehicles, and increased traffic poses risks to the safety of residents and visitors alike. Moreover, the additional strain on local infrastructure may result in road damage and further inconvenience to the community.

In light of these concerns, I kindly request that thorough and transparent assessments be conducted to evaluate the potential environmental, social, and economic impacts of the Burrendong Wind Farm. I believe it is crucial to consider alternative locations and technologies that minimize adverse effects on the community and its surroundings.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I trust that you will take into account the well-founded objections of the local community and make decisions that prioritize the long-term well-being of both the environment and its residents.

Sincerely,

Brian Walsh

I am greatly concerned about the environmental impacts this project will cause. The effects to flora and fauna are massive let alone the possibility of contaminants entering the water system. Turbines cannot be recycled and are placed in landfill and it blows my mind that people actually think this is ok.

I strongly object to terrible ugly and toxic disaster for our environment. Why isn't Australia protecting our environment and wildlife and importantly our way of life. Why are we not fighting against an offsure multinational company who does not care about the impacts this farm will have. This will wind farm will impact negatively on community and environment and have devasting consequences to both the people, the land and our wildlife.

These Turbines should be installed in location that is
closer to existing power grid for easier grid tie in. Please don't destroy the natural habutat and water way of this area that i personally have enjoyed many times. Turbines should be build close to freeways for cheaper maintenance and repairs when they invariably break down. I have a user pays philosophy about tubines. The pro turbine voters should have turbines built in close proximity to allow them to be marvelled upon by this voter group..
Thankyou for your understanding and time,
Greg

I was lucky enough to be invited to the Pedersen property at Yarrabin almost 15 years ago. I was amazed at how beautiful the property is and instantly fell in love with it. Since then I have visited regularly to spend time with our friends there and escape the city and our busy lives. In the years since, I’ve had children and Yarrabin is one of their favourite places to visit because they  are free to explore in nature. And I love it for them because there is no technology in sight.
We often go on bush walks to the top of the highest point in the property which has expansive views out to Burrendong Dam and the Worlds End ridge line. The view is so beautiful and we often go there for sunset to enjoy it.

If the Ark Energy wind turbine project goes ahead, it will completely destroy this beautiful part of Australia, and rob us of our escape from the city to beautiful nature with our community of friends. It would also do a massive amount of damage to the local wildlife and landscape.

The construction and ongoing noise once completed will force all the local wildlife to leave the area, or worse, kill them. I have read about how damaging these wind turbines are to land and air animals, and how noisy and disruptive they are to human mental health.
They also are really expensive to maintain, so if there are any issues with them, they often get left in disrepair to rust up and are never removed, which makes them an eyesore on our landscape forever, a detrimental legacy for future generations to deal with.

As far as renewable energy goes, this technology is at the bottom of the barrel. Let’s do better. Please stop this project now.