Skip to main content
Name Withheld
Object
HIGHFIELDS , New South Wales
Message
The proposed development is out of character for the environment. The height is extreme and will negatively impact the local aesthetic. If this proposed development goes ahead it will forever change the nature of developments in Newcastle. All developments should be considered and approved by locals and not be approved by people from major cities. Newcastle does need to increase housing supply but not at the expense of dramatically changing the landscape. A 45 metre high building is excessive and will cast shadows, increase traffic which the town can not sufficiently sustain. These types of proposals should not be approved so fast and should be given time for the local newcastle residents to consider and provide feedback. I fundamentally disagree with this development. Change is always needed but not to the detriment of our city. Development should be considered but this development is excessive and will line the pockets of the developers and is not in the interest of anyone but themselves. Newcastle needs to be protected from becoming a concrete jungle. We need progressive and thoughtful development for a sustainable future.
Name Withheld
Object
HAMILTON SOUTH , New South Wales
Message
The height of the building and its profile in a cultural area as proposed is ridiculous. If you can't build a 3 storey building and make a profit, you can't be much of a developer.
Take a walk around the area and see the precinct as is. The proposed building is unnecessary and would seriously harm the character of the area.
Not that any of the people associated with this development are going to live anywhere near it.
Name Withheld
Object
BAR BEACH , New South Wales
Message
This would significantly change the streetscape und the character of the Cooks Hill neighbourhood
Name Withheld
Object
COOKS HILL , New South Wales
Message
I write to formally object to the proposed 12-storey apartment complex within Newcastle’s Civic Precinct.

The current legal height limit for this site is 14 metres. The proposal seeks to more than triple this limit to 45 metres through a “spot rezone.” Such an extreme departure from established planning controls is inappropriate for this location and sets a damaging precedent in a community that is proud of its village feel. The scale and bulk of a 45-metre tower is entirely inconsistent with the surrounding built form.

The proposed front tower would visually dominate the two-storey art gallery, Civic Park, surrounding gardens, key landmarks, historic and cultural buildings, war memorials, and nearby places of worship. This area forms the heart of Newcastle’s civic identity. A 12-storey structure would overshadow and overwhelm the established character and diminish the human scale of these important public spaces.

The proposal conflicts with Newcastle’s long-standing planning strategy to concentrate high-rise development within designated corridors and precincts, rather than dispersing it into sensitive civic and heritage areas. Approving a spot rezone of this magnitude undermines strategic planning certainty and weakens community confidence in the planning framework.

For these reasons, I strongly oppose the proposed development and respectfully request that it be refused. The scale, strategic inconsistency, and heritage loss, collectively demonstrate that this proposal is not in the public interest.
Name Withheld
Object
TIGHES HILL , New South Wales
Message
45m is way higher than the legal height. The bill and scale of the build is too much and the set backs are small. It will over shadow the community spaces like Civic Park, art gallery, library, etc. There are already designated areas for high rise development in Newcastle.
Name Withheld
Support
EAST MAITLAND , New South Wales
Message
Newcastle needs more development, and this is the perfect way to do. The original building is brutalist and ugly. Newcastle needs to go up, not out.
Frances Johnston
Object
The Hill , New South Wales
Message
I have lived in McCormack st, one block from this proposed development, for 5 years and I am alarmed by how inappropriate this development is for the proposed location.
My street is one way and exits onto Tyrrell St. It is already over serviced as a thoroughfare for Church street and surround streets in the suburb. It is increasing difficult to turn out onto Tyrrell St over the last few years due to the increase in traffic and this enormous proposed development would be disastrous for local residents.
I think the current building height restrictions are more than reasonable in this area, and any building exceeding this size are completely inappropriate for local infrastructure. There are already areas nearby that have been approved for high rise developments such as Newcastle West and this would be a more appropriate location for a residential complex of this size.
My child attends the small  local public school which is only  two blocks  from this development. It  already has very limited outdoor area and is catchment for the large developments in the East End and Sovereign Park. I think further large development should be placed in areas that are better able to mange this considerable increase in local population.

There are many reasons our current planning controls limit building sizes in this area and a proposed increase of about 300% is completely out of keeping with this culturaly and historically important.
This development is absolutely the wrong choice for this area.
Matthew Page
Object
LAMBTON , New South Wales
Message
Please refer to attached document that has all my concerns listed. I object to the project in its current form.
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Marrickville , New South Wales
Message
This is project is not in keeping with the rest of the Cooks Hill area, it will ruin the atmosphere of this popular precinct.

Pagination

Subscribe to