Why in the middle of suburbia? Less than 1km from family homes? Can you guarantee that our children will not have side effects from the small particles your enormous towers will be emitting? Would the rich people that have submitted the development live here? We have had enough. Take your dial a dump facility and put it somewhere else. There are so many other options for you.

We oppose the build of the next generation energy from waste incinerator at Eastern Creek.
This proposal is not far from my property and I have grave concerns for the health impacts this may have on my family and self.
As it is now living living approximately 5 mms from the Rastetn Crrek tip at times the odour which omits from the site affects us now, and has had an affect on social gatherings at our home. Having this waste burner across the highway from my home we will be affected by the smoke which will be emitted, no one actually knows the long term impacts on a persons health. I do not want to have my family to closed to this type of waste, -and having been living here for the past 18 years we have not had to be concerned for our long term health.
In addition to the unknown health issues and toxins that we would be exposed to, our property values will significantly decrease. With the current pricing of housing in this state, we cannot afford to have our property value decrease.
We have worked hard for what we have and to raise our family in a safe environment, bring cautions of our sourrunds when purchasing a property.
We strongly oppose this development and would strongly advis against its approval, if approval of as granted we would pursue for the council/ government to purchase our property at the value it was prior to the development

I am totally appalled at this incinerator suggedtion. Let's just add to the already high Asthma statistics that have Australia up the top of the world asthma list. We should be recycling as much waste as possible and investing money in recycling machinery. To return to the dark ages where burning refuse was the way to go is just ridiculous. One of the great things about Sydney is even on the worst day air pollution is so much lower than other major cities in the world. We DO NOT want this incinerator built anywhere in Australia let alone in Western Sydney.Invest in modern recycle methods and there has to be other methods for dealing with this. Asthma deaths will result if this comes to fruition.

Updated 30/1/2017:

I am strongly opposed to the Eastern Creek Energy waste facility to be located in the Blacktown council area.

There are many reasons to no support it some include the following:
- This part of Western Sydney needs to protect the air quality especially given we will have a second airport soon with more air polution.
- The facility is too close to urban areas.
- It is too large for the area and in doing so is too risky for this part of Western Sydney to support.

I clearly live in close proximity to the proposed project location within 800, I also work in the same diameter at Startrack where we also have hundreds of people are employed, I cannot comprehend why such a project of such magnitude classified as the largest one of its kind in the world has to be considered, in such close proximity to a built up area that has been there for decades, it surely will affect peoples health and lifestyle, this kind of business is will only be profitable for a handful of people and potentially affect the lives and health of thousands for a profit, please do not let the air quality in the entire Sydney basin be reduced as we require a cleaner environment for all our children as we will all be affected.
lets see if we can find better more renewable ways to make such businesses profitable other than stepping back in time using old methods.
Western Sydney is one of the largest growing areas in Australia lets not tarnish it with a giant incinerator.

We live very close to the premise and also a lot of other residents. How can you put the waste facility so close to the living area. We have children as well. If your children grow up in the waste facility area, what do you think? We are strongly object it.

It is totally unacceptable. The facility shouldn't be build in the Sydney Metro Area. The emission will be harmful for the health and the waste is very bad for the children.

I wish to register my objection to this proposal. Having a history of asthma in my family, I have tried to live a good life - never smoked, eat well. We moved to the outskirts of Sydney ( Penrith) 19 years ago to bring our children up in a healthy environment, close to the Blue Mountains and Nepean River where we could enjoy recreational activities as a family. After all the good we have done for our family, to have a toxic waste incinerator to be be developed no more than 8 kilometres from our home upsets me to the core. It is disgraceful that this proposal is even being considered being that the Baadgery Creek airport has been thrust upon us and that will already add huge amounts of heavy metal particles and other pollutants into the air and to then have this in amongst the most populated areas of Sydney is criminal

This DA is LESS than 500metres from our homes. The information on the DA is incorrect.

The health effects stated in the EIS state "The proposed Facility may release substances to atmosphere which have the potential to harm human health." For this reason ALONE this DA should not be approved when it's so close to residential areas.

There is enough evidence from overseas that suggests this type of DA will harm the health of nearby businesses (workers) and residential homes. There is no evidence there will be no concern for human health risk, air quality and greenhouse gases, odour, ozone, traffic, waste management, noise and vibration.

Ian Malouf has already polluted Minchinbury with increased dust, noise and smells from his current landfill. He is NOT a fit and proper person to be proposing such a large, health and environmental affecting development having had so many ongoing EPA breaches previously and ongoing.

The application has not demonstrated that the proposal will not result in significant visual impacts when viewed from within Erskine Park. In this regard, the visual impact assessment has not considered the impact of the development on views from within the property boundaries of residential development sites. In particular, properties 7 - 10 Hocking Place & 167- 187 Swallow Drive, Erskine Park.

He donates a lot of money to the NSW Liberal party. This is a conflict of interest

I object to this DA and trust this NSW Liberal Government will make the right decision to reject this proposal based on the lack of evidence for health concerns and incorrect information rather than corporate profit political donations and other influencing factors that may be put ahead of community rights and concerns.

The attached amended DA does not correctly identify the distance between the residential area of Minchinbury and the proposal.

The residential area, including sporting fields, a primary school, various child care facilities etc is LESS than 500metres from the DA Proposal.

The health effects stated in the EIS state "The proposed Facility may release substances to atmosphere which have the potential to harm human health." this DA should not be approved when it's so close to residential areas.

There is no evidence there will be no concern for human health risk, air quality and greenhouse gases, odour, ozone, traffic, waste management, noise and vibration.

This applicant, Ian Malouf, and Boiling Pty Ltd - a firm associated with Dial a Dump owner Ian Malouf, has already received a large number of EPA breaches over the past few years for non compliances. This person is NOT a fit and proper person to be proposing such a large, health and environmental affecting development.

The application has not demonstrated that the proposal will not result in significant visual impacts when viewed from within Erskine Park. In this regard, the visual impact assessment has not considered the impact of the development on views from within the property boundaries of residential development sites. In particular, properties 7 - 10 Hocking Place & 167- 187 Swallow Drive, Erskine Park.

I object to this DA and trust this NSW Liberal Government will make the right decision to reject this proposal based on the lack of evidence for health concerns and incorrect information rather than corporate profit political donations and other influencing factors that may be put ahead of community rights and concerns.