TfNSW submission to RtS.

RMS Submission to RtS

OEH Submission.

I approve of this design as long as the 8.5 metre height limit is
maintained, staff parking is addressed more closely as it has already
impacted on streets around the school now
Lighting/ room lighting and signage on the outside of buildings are
not left on at night, or aluminate across the street and kept to a
minimum requirement
The secondary entrance is not used for early morning deliveries or
cleaner entrance and is locked at night to prevent this , and not lit
up like a Christmas tree at night.
no loading zones should be created in Playfair Road , and no loss of
on street parking as between school staff and construction workers and
regular park and sports uses places are limited now.
No extended work hours,
and tree screening is created along the Playfair road frontage

Dear Iona,

Thank you for referring the Response to Submissions listed above to
Sydney Water.

We have reviewed the documents and have no further comments to make.

Please let me know if you have further questions.

Kind regards,

Lulu Huang
Student Town Planner
Growth Planning and Development | Liveable City Solutions
Sydney Water, Level 7, 1 Smith Street, Parramatta NSW 2150

Ph 8849 4269
[email protected]

This submission is made on behalf of Peter and Michelle Puhl of 60 Abbott
Road, North Curl Curl - Response to the amended plans:

1. Additional construction hours on a Saturday are not supported on
grounds of unreasonable traffic, access and parking conflicts with
weekend sporting operations at John Fisher Park.

2. It is recommended that windows to the eastern elevation of
buildings adjacent to the eastern boundary be appropriately treated
and/or screen louvres erected, to protect the visual & acoustic
privacy & amenity of 60 Abbott Road. Appropriate architectural
treatment mentioned above combined with landscaping will assist in
providing a reasonable level of amenity and privacy to adjoining
residential properties.

3. The streetscape presentation and setbacks to Abbott Road of the
revised design are insufficient. A greater landscape setback would
soften and enhance the presentation of the development to its street.

Regards:
R Hoschke
Eaglemont Planning