I strongly oppose this recycling plant in Moorebank and the extended 5 year period. Do not ruin innocent families lives.

I object to this application due to a number of arguments raised time and time again by the Moorebank residents.
One of the main arguments raised about air pollution that will be caused by the recycling plant. This will in turn raise other issues such as noise pollution and increase traffic flow.
Another key argument to support my submission is the damage this will cause to the local waterways and surrounding environment. You would think this would be taken serious for the future generations but obviously not.
To conclude how could anyone in their right mind would want to go ahead with such an eyesore. Let's add to value of our local area for its residents.

Maria Ipermachou

Do some proper planning and assessment and think of how badly you will be affecting all the families and environment in this area.
I strongly oppose this.

Disgusted with this recycling plant and the thought of an extended 5 year period. I strongly oppose the recycling plant and the extended 5 year period.
Think of all the families and environment you will be ruining.

Think of all the families which are going to be negatively impacted and all the health you will be damaging.
Think about the environment.
Do some proper planning and assessment.
I strongly oppose this Recycling plant and the extended period.

I strongly oppose this recycling plant in Moorebank and the extended period.
Show some consideration to the families and the environment which are going to be negatively impacted.
Show some proper planning, as thats what your supposed to be doing.

I STRONGLY OPPOSE this recycling plant in Moorebank and strongly oppose the extended 5 year period.

Stop this horrid recycling plant for the sake of the families surrounding this area, the environment and adding to already horrific traffic around the area.

I strongly OPPOSE this awful recycling plant altogether including the extended 5 year period. Absolute joke.

Think about all the families including young babies who are so vulnerable who will all be exposed to this ridiculous recycling plant. STOP THIS NOW FROM GOING AHEAD.

I STRONGLY OBJECT TO ANY MODIFICATIONS OR EXTENSION OF TIME TO THE ABOVE FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS.
The PAC failed to acknowledge that another new estate named New Brighton Lakes is currently being developed in close proximity to the recycling plant when construction was already under way. Why was this never mentioned?
If access as PAC says to the recycling site is challenging, then I fail to understand how it could be approved. Where does the ENVIRONMENT come in here, in fact the ENVIRONMENT was not even considered when approval was given. WHY? Failure on the PAC, Planning Dept and Moorebank Recyclers not to take into consideration that this development will be in close proximity to 900 + homes in Georges Fair and 300+ in New Brighton, as well as being in a flood and fire zone causing possible environmental damage to our river and surrounding area to this development.

I STRONGLY OBJECT TO ANY MODIFICATIONS AND EXTENSION OF TIME GIVEN AS SINCE 2005 WHEN THE AREA IN QUESTION WAS APPROVED FOR MAJOR PROJECTS, THE OWNERS OF MOOREBANK RECYCLING HAS WAITED UNTIL DEC 2015 WHEN MOST OF THE BUILDING OF HOUSES IN GEORGES FAIR HAS BEEN COMPLETED TO SEEK APPROVAL FOR MODIFICATIONS.

SHOULD AND WHEN THIS RECYCLERS SITE IN CAMELIA BE EARMARKED FOR RESIDENTIAL IN THE NEAR FUTURE COULD THIS BE THE REASON WHY THE OWNER OF BOTH THESE SITES REQUESTED THE EXTENSION OF TIME UNTIL 2018 FOR MOOREBANK??

SO I DO OBJECT TO ANY MODIFICATIONS OR EXTENSION OF TIME BE GIVEN.

IT WOULD BE GREATLY CONSIDERED IF JUST FOR ONCE CONSIDERATION WAS GIVEN TO THE MANY RESIDENTS WHO HAVE VOICED THE OBJECTIONS TO THIS DEVELOPMENT AND HAVE BEEN TOTALLY IGNORED.

I strongly object to the development and any modification made to the application. Air and noise pollution are not wanted nor accepatable in such a high residential area. This development should never have been approved.