Skip to main content
Name Withheld
Object
Moorebank , New South Wales
Message
I object to this request for a modification to the approval on the grounds that the original proposal should never have been granted approval in the first place. It is quite clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that placing building waste disposal facility on that lot surrounded by homes, a marina, a river, a golf course, and eventually parklands/cycleways/walking tracks is a clear example of planning stupidity. At no point has the commercial entity in its proposal, nor the planning & environment department in its approval, demonstrated how this facility will enhance the area, nor provide a benefit that outweighs what a blight it will be, and an obstruction to the development of the area as a natural asset to the local community. The Planning & Environment Department should add the letters "Un" to the front of its name, since if you were to view an overhead photograph of the area in 10 years time based on this decision you would swear that someone had just plonked this facility randomly like in a game of pin the tail on the donkey.
Name Withheld
Object
Sylvania , New South Wales
Message
I have recently purchased a unit in Liverpool and I would like to keep the Georges river clean and the moorebank kept residential area only
William Marasigan
Object
Moorebank , New South Wales
Message
As a concerned resident within the local area, regardless of the development application, I am in opposition to the application for modification to MP 05_0157 MOD 1 at site Lot 6 DP 1065574 Newbridge Road, Moorebank.

The primary reason for my objection to the five year extension of the consent period is that it will prolong the official rejection of the overall development application causing anxiety for the surrounding residents and businesses, also diminishing the value of the area in real terms from private and public investment. Given the amount of time already surpassed I believe the sunset clause in the Liverpool LEP which expires on September 1st, 2018 is, and has been adequate enough.

I reiterate my strong objection to this application and look forward to a positive outcome.
Name Withheld
Object
Padstow Heights , New South Wales
Message
I object to the application for modification to MP 05_0157 MOD 1 at site Lot 6 DP 1065574 Newbridge Road, Moorebank. The consent period must not be extended beyond what is already documented in the existing application.
Catherine Eichwald
Object
Padstow Heights , New South Wales
Message
I object to the application for modification to MP 05_0157 MOD 1 at site Lot 6 DP 1065574 Newbridge Road, Moorebank. As a community member who has family including grandchildren living in Georges Fair which is opposite this proposed site, I reject the application to extend the consent period, as this will continue to have a negative impact on the local community.
Nadia Marasigan
Object
Moorebank , New South Wales
Message
I strongly oppose the application for modification to MP 05_0157 MOD 1 at site Lot 6 DP 1065574 Newbridge Road, Moorebank. An additional five year extension to the consent period just prolongs the process of a potential and highly damaging waste recycling plant impacting on the residents of Georges Fair and the greater area of Moorebank. I strongly believe the consent period should be in accordance with the sunset clause in the Liverpool LEP which expires on September 1st, 2018. No further extensions to the consent period are to be made to prolong this devastating development application. I hope that the community has their voice heard in this matter regarding the negative effects that this modification application has on the local community.
Moorebank Residents' Action Group
Object
Moorebank , New South Wales
Message
Dear Mr Witherdin,
Firstly, we would like to express our absolute disgust at the way in which this EA Exhibition came to be public knowledge. Why was there no community consultation for such a controversial and highly objectionable modification until Community Representatives made approach to the Department?
Our Community strongly objects to the modification, being an extension to the consent period for the development. Under advice, we understand that being a Transitional Part 3A project, approval for this project laspses 5 years after the repeal of Part 3A - being 1st October, 2016. Any modification to allow extension from this date would be unlawful, not to mention immoral. Additionally, in no way is this a minor modification - extension of approval by 4 years cannot be considered minor!
The approval granted by PAC for the project relies on the Liverpool LEP. Under this planning control, permissibility for the project exists only until 1st September, 2018 - 2 years shy of what the proponent is seeking..hardy a minor modification!
We look forward to a fair and just outcome from the Department, and by following legislation, a lapse of consent confirmed as at 1st October, 2016.
With regards,
Fiona Macnaught
President - Moorebank Residents' Action Group
Name Withheld
Object
Moorebank , New South Wales
Message
Dear Mr Witherdin,
Firstly, I would like to express my absolute disgust at the way in which this EA Exhibition came to be public knowledge - I honestly believe that if Community Representatives had not made approach to the Department to clarify the modification sought and the timeline for submissions, this modification would have been granted without any community consultation.
I strongly object to the modification, being an extension to the consent period for the development. My understanding is that being a Transitional Part 3A project, approval for this project laspses 5 years after the repeal of Part 3A - being 1st October, 2016. Any modification to allow extension from this date would be unlawful, not to mention immoral.
I look forward to a fair and just outcome from the Department, and following legislation, a lapse of consent on 1st October, 2016.
With regards,
Fiona Macnaught
Name Withheld
Object
Moorebank , New South Wales
Message
Dear Mr Anthony Witherdin,

Thank you for your notification of Moorebank Waste Recycling Facility's request to extend the time allowed for the construction of the proposed recycling plant. On behalf of my family, I wish to voice our strong objection to this request and would like to have few words to express our serious concern over this application to extend the consent.

We are a young family of 4 and live across to Brickmarkers Road, which means our home is one of the closest to the proposed development. To be honest, every day when getting on the road to take the kids to school, I can't help but look across over to the lovely greenery and ponds that I currently see and seriously dread what will become of my street, my neighbourhood and my community if this disasterous horrific development comes into effect . Like every other families in our neighbourhood, we have invested immensely on creating what we dreamt to be our long-term nest, only to now be waiting anxiously not knowing whether this horrendous project will eventually come through. To be living through this fear every day and to learn that this misery may be extended beyond the already torturous daily reminder brings great agony and grief to our family. Please please stop this nonsense - our families do not want to be breathing in toxic materials that will kill us.
Name Withheld
Object
PANANIA , New South Wales
Message
I object to consent extension applied by Moorebank recyclers as i object to the whole project which will ruin our community and shatter our housing dream and cause health hazards to our future generation and beloved ones .i don't agree to give them 5 years extension for the project.
i live in Georges fair Moorebank and absolutely opposing his development which will just ruin our dream and put our kids at risk in terms of health and safety

Pagination

Subscribe to