vera poole
Comment
vera poole
Comment
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
McMahons Point
,
New South Wales
Message
Please see attachement
Attachments
Laurence Mather
Object
Laurence Mather
Object
Milsons Point
,
New South Wales
Message
The Shore school site is totally without the boundaries of Lavender Bay Precinct, North Sydney Local Government Area, This submission concerns only the traffic management plans. This precinct abuts Union Precinct, and residents of this precinct use the local roads. We therefore express very serious concerns over some of the traffic management plans.
Please see File attachment 1 "Shore - effects on Lavender Bay Precinct.pdf
Please see File attachment 1 "Shore - effects on Lavender Bay Precinct.pdf
Attachments
Neil Cowdery
Support
Neil Cowdery
Support
St Ives Chase
,
New South Wales
Message
Please accept this submission regarding the Graythwaite Project Application. Submission attached.
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
North Sydney
,
New South Wales
Message
Re: MP 10_0150 & MP 10_0149 - Graythwaite Concept Plan
I strongly OBJECT to this Revised EA and Concept Plan.
This revised application will result in extreme traffic congestion.
It has not resolved many of the issues raised by the local community.
The proposal does not comply to the 8.5m height limit for the site.
I request that the department rejects this application until these and other issues are resolved.
I DO NOT give permission for my name or address to be made available to the proponent,
other interested public authorities, nor for it to appear on the Department's website.
I have made NO political donations in the last 2 years.
I strongly OBJECT to this Revised EA and Concept Plan.
This revised application will result in extreme traffic congestion.
It has not resolved many of the issues raised by the local community.
The proposal does not comply to the 8.5m height limit for the site.
I request that the department rejects this application until these and other issues are resolved.
I DO NOT give permission for my name or address to be made available to the proponent,
other interested public authorities, nor for it to appear on the Department's website.
I have made NO political donations in the last 2 years.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Cronulla
,
New South Wales
Message
Re: MP 10_0150 & MP 10_0149 - Graythwaite Concept Plan
I STRONGLY OBJECT to this Revised EA and Concept Plan.
As far as I can see, the proposed alterations have done nothing to meet the objections that I lodged in my previous submission in any substantial way.
As with the previous plan, this revised plan, if implemented, would be sure to generate extreme traffic congestion, causing great difficulties and frustrations for the local community. Indeed, I am sure that users of the school would also encounter great difficulties - the staff, parents dropping pupils off, and so on. Along with increased congestion comes more noise and more pollution from car exhausts. And more stress for all concerned. This is no environment to educate the young!
I am also concerned about the degree of community consultation that has been undertaken. I find it hard to believe that any real attempt has been made to come to terms with the objections that have been raised by people in the local community. This development has been foisted on them in a way that will compromise their quality of life, and possibly also compromise the value of their property. Their views deserve to be taken into account with a more reasonable and serious attitude. Indeed, the cavalier attitude that the revision of this plan shows seems to me to bring into question the cultural and community values of Shore School.
As far as I can see, the height limit of 8.5 metres for the site has not been complied with. This is a serious matter, and should of its own invalidate the proposal. The creeping increases in the heights of buildings across Sydney is of widespread concern.
I therefore request that the Department of Planning rejects this development application until the above issues have been resolved, and any other issues that have been raised or which will be raised by members of the local community and other concerned people.
Yours sincerely
I do not give permission for my name or address to be made available to the proponent, other interested public authorities, nor for it to appear on the Department's website. Nor do I give permission for my email address to be forwarded to other parties.
I have made no political donations in the last 2 years.
I STRONGLY OBJECT to this Revised EA and Concept Plan.
As far as I can see, the proposed alterations have done nothing to meet the objections that I lodged in my previous submission in any substantial way.
As with the previous plan, this revised plan, if implemented, would be sure to generate extreme traffic congestion, causing great difficulties and frustrations for the local community. Indeed, I am sure that users of the school would also encounter great difficulties - the staff, parents dropping pupils off, and so on. Along with increased congestion comes more noise and more pollution from car exhausts. And more stress for all concerned. This is no environment to educate the young!
I am also concerned about the degree of community consultation that has been undertaken. I find it hard to believe that any real attempt has been made to come to terms with the objections that have been raised by people in the local community. This development has been foisted on them in a way that will compromise their quality of life, and possibly also compromise the value of their property. Their views deserve to be taken into account with a more reasonable and serious attitude. Indeed, the cavalier attitude that the revision of this plan shows seems to me to bring into question the cultural and community values of Shore School.
As far as I can see, the height limit of 8.5 metres for the site has not been complied with. This is a serious matter, and should of its own invalidate the proposal. The creeping increases in the heights of buildings across Sydney is of widespread concern.
I therefore request that the Department of Planning rejects this development application until the above issues have been resolved, and any other issues that have been raised or which will be raised by members of the local community and other concerned people.
Yours sincerely
I do not give permission for my name or address to be made available to the proponent, other interested public authorities, nor for it to appear on the Department's website. Nor do I give permission for my email address to be forwarded to other parties.
I have made no political donations in the last 2 years.