We do not need a 5 storey building in Kingscliff there is limited parking available the increased traffic noise will have a detrimental effect on the area.

Submission in Support of Mixed-Use Development 4–8 Bell Boulevard, Kingscliff

To Tweed Shire Council,

We write in support of the proposed development at 4–8 Bell Boulevard, Kingscliff.

As the developers of 9 Grand Parade, Casuarina, we are committed to the long-term growth of the Kingscliff–Casuarina coastal corridor. With additional housing being delivered across the region — including through our own project — it is important that established village centers continue to evolve and strengthen to support that growth.

In our view, this proposal plays an important role in further activating Salt Village. Bringing more activity to Bell Boulevard will help reinforce the area as a genuine local hub — a place people walk to, gather in and use throughout the day. Thoughtful activation at street level, combined with increased residential presence, will support local businesses and contribute to a more vibrant and connected precinct.

We also consider the overall scale and design approach to be appropriate for its surroundings. The proposal reflects the relaxed coastal character of Kingscliff and sits comfortably within the existing built form of Salt Village. The way the building massing responds to its context demonstrates a measured and respectful outcome, allowing for growth while maintaining the village feel that makes the area attractive.

As the coastal population continues to grow, it is critical that key nodes such as Salt Village are supported to mature in a balanced way. Strengthening established centers through considered density and activation ensures the broader region functions more sustainably and cohesively.

We believe this development represents a positive step in that direction and respectfully encourage Council to support the application.

Yours sincerely,
Azure Development Group

Submission in Support of Mixed-Use Development
4–8 Bell Boulevard, Kingscliff

To Whom It May Concern,

I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed-use development at 4–8 Bell Boulevard, Kingscliff.
Salt Village has long had the potential to evolve into a more vibrant and complete precinct, and this proposal represents a thoughtful and well-balanced step forward. The mixed-use nature of the development will bring greater activity and life to the area, supporting local businesses while creating a genuine sense of place for residents and visitors alike.

Importantly, the project provides a diverse mix of housing options, including affordable dwellings. This is something Kingscliff genuinely needs. Ensuring that people at different life stages and income levels can continue to live locally — whether they are young professionals, families, key workers or downsizers — is critical to maintaining a healthy and inclusive community.

The way the building heights transition across the three stages is also well considered. The stepped form responds appropriately to the surrounding context, creating a balanced outcome that respects neighboring properties while still delivering meaningful community benefit. The scale feels measured rather than excessive, and the design aligns with Kingscliff’s relaxed coastal character.

The inclusion of shared spaces and landscaped areas further strengthens the proposal. These elements will encourage connection, support active living, and contribute to a welcoming environment that enhances Salt Village as a whole.
Overall, this is a carefully planned development that supports housing diversity, local employment, and long-term community outcomes. I believe it represents a positive and sensible evolution for the site and for Kingscliff more broadly.

I respectfully encourage Council to approve the application.

Kind regards,
Patrick Hanlon

Please find attached an objection from Kingscliff Ratepayers and Progress Association Inc to SSD 83069459 Mixed Use Development Bells Boulevard Kingscliff
Many thanks
Peter Newton
President

I’m writing to express my support for the new development proposed for Kingscliff. This is exactly what the Tweed needs right now, mixed-use spaces and more diverse housing options. It’s refreshing to see a design that offers something different rather than more of the same.

The site is currently an empty block that provides little benefit to the community in terms of activation or aesthetics, and its redevelopment would not impact animal habitat. It feels like a highly appropriate and thoughtful use of the land.

I especially appreciate that the design prioritises shared spaces and a sense of community, rather than simply placing large houses on small lots. We need more varied housing options and a shift away from the traditional standalone model toward more modern, connected ways of living.

With the addition of new shops, this development would be a welcome enhancement to the Salt area, creating another place for people to gather with friends and family. This project isn’t just about building homes, it’s about creating a vibrant destination that will strengthen and enrich our region.

To: NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure
Subject: Formal Objection: SSD-47105958 – Mixed Use Development, 4-8 Bells Boulevard, Salt
Dear Assessment Officer,
I am writing to formally object to the State Significant Development application for 4-8 Bells Boulevard, Salt. While I acknowledge that the detached and row housing components are appropriate for the site, I strongly oppose the apartment component. It represents an unacceptable shift from local planning intent to a private developer windfall at the expense of the community.
My objection is based on the following grounds:
1.Strategic Misuse of the SSD Pathway ("Spot Rezoning")
I object to the proponent’s use of the Housing Delivery Authority (HDA) pathway to execute what is effectively a "spot rezoning." By lodging a concurrent rezoning request, the proponent is "hedging" against local controls to bypass the rigorous Gateway Process typically required for height variations. This tactic prioritises commercial certainty for the developer over the Kingscliff Locality Plan (KLP) and sets a dangerous regional precedent.
2. Disproportionate Value Exchange: Developer Profit vs. Public Loss
The proposed 21.4m height exceeds the Tweed LEP 2014 limit of 13.6m by over 50%. This massive increase in yield creates a significant financial windfall for the developer, yet the "public benefit" offered—just two affordable housing units—is tokenistic. Under the Housing SEPP, significant height bonuses typically require 10–15% contributions. This proposal represents a permanent loss of solar amenity and local character for a negligible social return.
3. No Guarantee of Genuine Housing: The STRA Threat
The proponent frames this rezoning of SP3 Tourism land as a solution to the housing crisis, yet there are no mechanisms or restrictive covenants to ensure these luxury units provide long-term housing for the local workforce. Given the location, these units are highly susceptible to becoming Short-Term Rental Accommodation (STRA). Without strict controls, this project will likely result in "hollowed-out" luxury apartments that sit empty for much of the year, providing no genuine housing security.
4. Parking Deficit and Loss of At-Grade Amenity
The proposal fails to compensate for the permanent loss of the 27 existing at-grade car spaces currently used by the community. The provision of basement spaces for 69 apartments plus a high-turnover retail anchor is mathematically inadequate. This deficit will force "parking overspill" into surrounding residential streets, creating safety risks and significant congestion on a village-scale road network never intended for this level of density.
Conclusion
The Department should not allow the SSD process to be used as a tool to override locally settled planning heights for a project that prioritises developer profit over public value. I request that the application be refused in its current form and revised to comply with the established 13.6m height limit.
Yours sincerely,
Livy James

I strongly support this development in the Tweed region as a positive and much-needed contribution to housing in our area. It is not overly large, nor is it too sparse — it strikes a reasonable and balanced scale for this location. Thoughtful development is essential if we are to meet the housing needs of our growing community, and this proposal achieves that in a measured and appropriate way.

The project provides a well-considered mix of housing options at a sensible height, offering the diversity of accommodation that modern communities require. We need to move beyond the traditional model of the large standalone family home and instead provide a broader range of living options. This development responds to that need. It reflects a more progressive approach — one that looks beyond conventional Australian thinking and draws inspiration from European and Asian communities, where shared spaces and community-focused design foster connection and livability.

Importantly, this development activates land that is currently empty. No trees will be removed and no koala habitats disturbed. I particularly appreciate the generous use of open space; too many developments maximise their entire footprint, whereas this proposal prioritises green areas and communal spaces. The community is clearly at the forefront of the design — something that is unfortunately rare.

The plan also integrates well with the existing Salt development and complements the beautiful green spaces already established in the area. The developers have demonstrated a clear commitment to quality over quantity, creating a place that encourages people to engage with their surroundings rather than remain isolated inside their homes. In a climate as ideal as ours, designing spaces that invite people outdoors and into shared community areas makes perfect sense.

Finally, the additional shop precinct will further strengthen the area by attracting visitors from Byron and QLD, supporting small businesses, and creating local employment opportunities. This is a development that brings people into the community — not just into houses — and that is exactly the direction we should be moving toward. Thank you

Increasing the number of homes, apartments and retail offerings in Salt Village would significantly improve the area’s life. A larger local population and better conveniences would create a stronger community feel and bring new energy to local businesses.