Good morning, I am writing to object the proposal to change the rezoning and proposed development in Bells Boulevard. This community is defined by its peaceful character, modest residential and low level accommodation. I purchased my property here in 2016 due to the low density residential character the area represents. My concerns are:
1. The incompatibility with small village character - proposed development out of scale with the existing low rise homes which would alter the character and charm of a quiet coastal pocket of Salt Village.
2.Traffic and Safety concerns- Our narrow roads are not designed to accomodate substantial increases in traffic potentially reducing pedestrian safety.
3. Approval of re-zoning our little village would set a precedent for further high density developments for the future therefore ending the very qualities that make this village and its surroundings desirable.

Residents have invested in this small suburban community with reasonable expectation that existing zoning would remain in place.
I believe this substantial change in land use would negatively affect and diminish community amenity.
For these reasons I respectfully request that the proposed rezoning be rejected and the existing planning protections remain in place for the sake of safety, environmental sustainability and maintaining the character of our seaside community.

Thank you for considering my submission.

Sincerely

Karen

We have submitted our concerns re some of the development proposed for Bells Boulevard - not the whole proposal but for part of - important considerations we feel strongly about and know we represent a lot of people in the community.

As this will start a precedent for Casuarina and any other future high rise development / projects (above 3 floors) in the area

I’m strongly in favour of the Stage 3 proposal for Bells Boulevard. Salt Village is ready for a well‑designed mixed‑use precinct, and this project delivers exactly that. The range of housing choices — including more affordable options — is a real positive, and the MU1 zoning helps support a balanced, inclusive outcome. The overall design also fits naturally with Kingscliff’s coastal setting.

This proposal is the type of development Salt Village has been waiting for. It will bring more activity to the area, broaden local housing options, and create additional employment opportunities. Features like the central courtyard and communal areas will help foster community interaction and give the precinct a genuine sense of place. I also support the small height increase in the northern section, which appears thoughtfully considered.

The Stage 3 plans for Kingscliff seem to strike an effective balance between growth and maintaining the character of the surrounding neighbourhood. The stepped building heights are handled sensitively and allow the project to deliver benefits to the community without overwhelming the area.

It’s clear that this development has been prepared with a community focus — providing open spaces, strong street engagement, and a mixture of housing types, including more affordable options. The move to MU1 zoning feels appropriate for enabling a high‑quality mixed‑use outcome within Salt Village.

I support the Stage 3 proposal because it adds much‑needed housing variety in a well‑serviced part of Kingscliff. Offering 1‑, 2‑ and 3‑bedroom apartments — including affordable units — ensures the area can accommodate a wide range of residents. The planned parking also appears adequate for the precinct.

It’s encouraging to see a project that considers community wellbeing as much as built form. Shared spaces like the courtyard, wellness areas, and pickleball court will help residents stay active and connected. The scale of the development feels appropriate, and the architectural approach complements Kingscliff’s relaxed coastal feel.

This proposal represents a strong opportunity to boost Salt Village with well-planned density and more local jobs. Its emphasis on affordability, sustainability, high‑quality design, and extensive landscaping will make a lasting positive contribution to the look and experience of the area.

Kingscliff would benefit greatly from developments that provide a broader range of housing types, not only high‑end options. Including affordable housing, along with a measured and thoughtful design approach, helps ensure the community remains accessible for more people who live and work locally.

The plan for 4–8 Bells Boulevard brings meaningful community advantages. Upgrades to the public realm — including open green spaces and bike parking — will help promote healthier, more active living. I appreciate the project’s clear commitment to community‑oriented design.

I support this proposal because it combines diverse housing, community benefits, and local job creation while still respecting the character of Salt Village. The site has been empty for many years, and it’s great to finally see a proposal that uses it well through quality urban design.

This mixed‑use precinct has the potential to revitalise Salt Village. Its focus on greenery, open space, and seamless indoor–outdoor living — paired with varied housing options, including affordable units — makes it an attractive and functional place for future residents.

I support the Kingscliff Stage 3 development as it brings a mix of housing and amenities that Salt Village currently lacks. The central courtyard and walkable layout will encourage everyday interaction and strengthen community ties, while also supporting a lifestyle that is less reliant on cars.

The proposed modest height increase is reasonable when considered alongside the broader benefits the project provides. The overall scale feels appropriate, and the layout integrates well with the surrounding environment.

This is a smart and efficient use of the last remaining developable site in Salt Village. It will support local businesses, ensure organised servicing and waste management, and deliver a lively mixed‑use precinct that will function smoothly day to day.

The proposal shows a genuine dedication to quality and community outcomes. It addresses Kingscliff’s housing needs while still respecting the village character, using height transitions and design decisions that support a green, welcoming environment.

I am writing to object to the current proposed mixed used development at Bells Boulevarde, Kingscliff.
This proposal is excessive in height and goes against all other existing development height limits on the Tweed Coast south of Tweed Heads - i.e. maximum 13.6M. All other developments on the Tweed Coast have been subject to this long standing and important height limit. This 13.6M height limit is what makes this area unique. The majority of buildings in this area are housing. Many families live very close to this proposed development and purchased in this area due to the existing height limit, permitted land usages and zoning. It is very unfair to now change the goal posts. A large, imposing complex will be detrimental to the existing village and coastal atmosphere of the area, cause additional traffic, create lots of overflow parking, especially if the all-day tenants need to pay for their parking. The displayed architectural concept elevations show proposed buildings that look similar to 1960's government buildings, absolutely out of sync with the current style of architecture in the area. The proposal for the two affordable housing units are merely cynical platitudes in an attempt to have this gross overdevelopment approved. If this goes ahead the flood gates will be opened to other developments of a similar nature or worse. Please don't permit this overdevelopment to proceed. Thank you.

We write as local residents of Casuarina, NSW, to formally express our objection to the proposed Bells Boulevard (Salt) development.

While we acknowledge the broader need for additional accommodation in the region and do not object to development in principle, we have significant concerns about the scale and impact of this proposal in its current form.
Our key concerns are as follows:
- Excessive height: The proposed height of 21 metres substantially exceeds the current 13.6 metre limit.
- Increased storeys: The application seeks approval for five storeys, compared to the existing three-storey limit.
- Lack of precedent: There is no comparable development of this scale within the Salt precinct or surrounding areas.
- Insufficient parking: The proposal does not appear to adequately address parking demand.
- Traffic and noise impacts: Increased density will inevitably result in greater traffic volumes and noise in local streets that are not designed to accommodate such growth.
- Impact on village character and tourism: The Salt precinct has maintained a natural, relaxed atmosphere that is central to its appeal for both residents and visitors. This village character distinguishes the Northern Rivers from higher-density areas such as the Gold Coast. A development of this scale risks undermining the very qualities that attract tourism and support the local economy.

We are particularly concerned that approval of this development in its current form will set a precedent for future high-rise proposals in Kingscliff, Casuarina and beyond. Such a shift would permanently alter the character of the area, increasing density, traffic, and noise, and diminishing the lifestyle that long-term residents value.

To reiterate, our objection is not to development itself, but to the proposed height, scale, and associated impacts. We respectfully request that the planning authority carefully consider the views of local residents and ensure that any approved development remains consistent with the established character and planning framework of the Salt precinct and surrounding suburbs.

Thank you for your consideration.

- Cars will be parked on residential streets, already to capacity due to increase in short term holiday let
- Only access is Casuarina Way, not designed for increase in traffic. Same for bridge over Cudgen Cr.
- Affordable housing? Joke inclusions that will still be close to the million $ mark
- Height adjustment is not 'minor': it's an increase of over 50%, and a huge change in character of the area
- Storm water runoff will increase, and it can barely cope as it is
- No demand for more retail, we have lots of commercial spaces sitting empty at the moment
- Will impact the breeding of the bush stone curlews with additional traffic
- Major issues with garbage collection and loading bays, which will impact residents
- The scale of this proposal goes beyond what can be supported and has been previously permitted, and sets an undesirable precedent

I object to 5 levels. Please keep to 3 levels. I own a unit in Mantra Salt

I strongly object to the height limit above its current 13.6m and the lack of parking and impact on amenity. I encourage suitable development to proceed.