State Significant Development
Mt Thorley Coal Mine Continuation
Singleton Shire
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Attachments & Resources
Request for SEARs (1)
Application (1)
SEARS (1)
EIS (14)
Agency Submissions (10)
Public Hearing (6)
Response to Submissions (2)
Assessment (9)
Recommendation (9)
Determination (3)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (2)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
Penalty Notice issued to Mt Thorley Pty Ltd (SSD-6465, Singleton Shire LGA)
On 13 August 2021, the Department issued a $15,000 Penalty Notice to Mt Thorley Pty Ltd (Mt Thorley) for failing to ensure that no mine water is discharged from the Mt Thorley Warkworth mine complex. A rainfall event on 4-6 January 2021 resulted in a mine water dam overtopping and mine water discharging from site. An investigation by the Department concluded that Mt Thorley failed to design and maintain the mine water dams to comply with water management performance measures. Mt Thorley has committed to reviewing their water management infrastructure and their Water Management Plan to ensure no mine water is discharged from site.
Inspections
1/06/2020
14/08/2020
14/12/2021
27/09/2022
2/09/2024
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Christopher New
Support
Christopher New
Message
Daniel Solomon
Support
Daniel Solomon
Message
I have been witness to legislative changes in NSW planning resulting in the Warkworth PAC, subsequent appeal and ultimately the LEC court proceedings ensuing in the disapproval of the Warkworth Extension. The process has been an utter failure, neither smooth or timely and ultimately the judgement was not made on the basis of the scientific merit of the proposal.
Continuation of the project will help ensure the viability of the contracting company I work for. We are a small company with less than 20 workers and rely on mining for our continued profitability, the work we partake in is primarily land management based.
If the continuation does not go ahead I have concerns about the economics of singleton and the greater hunter valley region with a reduction in employment opportunities, revenues and housing prices.