Skip to main content

State Significant Development

Determination

Mt Thorley Coal Mine Continuation

Singleton Shire

Current Status: Determination

Interact with the stages for their names

  1. SEARs
  2. Prepare EIS
  3. Exhibition
  4. Collate Submissions
  5. Response to Submissions
  6. Assessment
  7. Recommendation
  8. Determination

Attachments & Resources

Request for SEARs (1)

Application (1)

SEARS (1)

EIS (14)

Agency Submissions (10)

Public Hearing (6)

Response to Submissions (2)

Assessment (9)

Recommendation (9)

Determination (3)

Approved Documents

Management Plans and Strategies (2)

Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.

Complaints

Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?

Make a Complaint

Enforcements

Penalty Notice issued to Mt Thorley Pty Ltd (SSD-6465, Singleton Shire LGA)

On 13 August 2021, the Department issued a $15,000 Penalty Notice to Mt Thorley Pty Ltd (Mt Thorley) for failing to ensure that no mine water is discharged from the Mt Thorley Warkworth mine complex.  A rainfall event on 4-6 January 2021 resulted in a mine water dam overtopping and mine water discharging from site.  An investigation by the Department concluded that Mt Thorley failed to design and maintain the mine water dams to comply with water management performance measures. Mt Thorley has committed to reviewing their water management infrastructure and their Water Management Plan to ensure no mine water is discharged from site.

Inspections

1/06/2020

14/08/2020

14/12/2021

27/09/2022

2/09/2024

Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.

Submissions

Filters
Showing 281 - 300 of 323 submissions
Dick White
Object
Singleton , New South Wales
Message
I strongly oppose the 2014 Continuation Project (SSD 6465). This proposal seeks to expand the Mount Thorley coal mine and I request that this Development Application be refused.

Two Court decisions have been made against this proposal.
If this proposed expansion is allowed there will be further significant negative impacts arising from the continued and excessive levels of dust and noise. Health issues will escalate and we will witness permanent and irreparable damage to our immediate natural environment.
The negative impacts of mining borne by the Bulga community are of much greater significance than given credit.
People selected Bulga for the rural lifestyle and so the community is built around the common values of its residents.
These Core Values embraced by residents of the Bulga area seem to have no place or value with Rio Tinto or the NSW Government.
:

Pride Management
Object
BULGA , New South Wales
Message
This project has been touted as the "difference" between the previous Warkworth expansion project in 2010 and this 2014 application. It must be considered in conjunction withteh current Warkworth project and refused.
Name Withheld
Object
Bulga , New South Wales
Message
Extension should not be granted.
The impact of this mine is too great on our homes and our lives; No amount of Noise suppression will change the impact; It is too close to our homes now; noise limits are too high;
Refer attached for further information.
Attachments
Heather Davis
Object
245 the inlet road , New South Wales
Message
My Husband and myself object to the above project because it has already been rejected by the Land and Environment court. Please see attached submission.
Attachments
Name Withheld
Support
Aberglasslyn , New South Wales
Message
Please see attached
Attachments
Marie Mitcgell
Object
Bulga , New South Wales
Message
My submission is attached in the PDF file below
Attachments
Stewart Mitchell
Object
Bulga , New South Wales
Message
My submission is attached in PDF format
Attachments
Mark Nolan
Support
SINGLETON , New South Wales
Message
Please see my attached submission
Attachments
Pauline Rayner
Object
BULGA , New South Wales
Message
I object to the application
Attachments
Ron Corino
Object
BULGA , New South Wales
Message
I object to the application
Attachments
Michael Rayner
Object
Bulga , New South Wales
Message
I object to the application
Attachments
Monadelphous
Support
Victoria Park , Western Australia
Message
Please find attached Monadelphous's submission regarding the Mount Thorley Warkworth Continuation Project.
Attachments
Denis Maizey
Object
Bulga , New South Wales
Message
.
Attachments
Doctors for the Environment Australia
Object
College Park , South Australia
Message
See attached file
Attachments
Naomi Cupitt
Object
Bulga , New South Wales
Message
My submission is attached.
Attachments
Bulga Coal Management Pty Ltd
Comment
Singleton , New South Wales
Message
See attached PDF
Attachments
Orica
Support
Kurri Kurri , New South Wales
Message
Refer to attachment
Attachments
Lock The Gate Alliance
Object
Hamilton , New South Wales
Message
See attached.
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Bulga , New South Wales
Message
I do not support the application to extend the Mount Thorley and Warkworth Mine (MTW) application and I object to the application for the reasons detailed in the following attachment.
Attachments
Tanya Tlaskal
Object
BULGA , New South Wales
Message
Personal Submission
WARKWORTH AND MOUNT THORLEY MINES CONTINUATION PROJECT (SSD 6464 and SSD 6465)

4 August, 2014

Tanya Tlaskal

313 Inlet Road, BULGA, NSW,2330



My name is Tanya Tlaskal and I am a resident of the village of Bulga.
I strongly oppose both the Warkworth (SSD 6464) and Mt Thorley (SSD 6465) Continuation Projects. No matter how Rio Tinto presents the project, it is still exactly the same old extension we have been fighting against for four years.

The NSW Land and Environment Court ruled in April 2013 in favour of Bulga village. Judge Preston found that the information used by Rio Tinto and NSW Planning in support of the project was wrong, and he overturned the approval.

When Rio Tinto and the NSW Government appealed that decision to the NSW Supreme Court (Court of Appeal), they lost. Two superior NSW courts have now ruled that Rio's plan to expand the Warkworth coal mine fails on merit.

We, people of Bugla were ecstatic, we have won, we thought that we can have some peace and to continue with our lives undisturbed. To our utter disbelief Rio Tinto have simply submitted the same mining application again. The old project has been split in two and the project name updated. However, these two projects (SSD 6464 and SSD 6465) are effectively the same project that has been rejected by two NSW courts (MP 09_0202).

That the Planning Department has even accepted Rio Tinto's application is a failure of procedural fairness, and makes a farce of the very process you are now asking us, the public, to participate in. We are being asked to make submissions on a project that has already been through this very same assessment process and failed - only to be resubmitted. We are being asked to submit to a process overseen by a Department that is clearly working closely with the proponent to get the project approved, and which got the decision wrong the first time around. There can be no faith in this process.

We will never stop fighting for our village, because it is a place we love and where we belong.
Our village's David and Goliath battle had become a symbol all over the world. We all know who had won in the end.

Attachments

Pagination

Project Details

Application Number
SSD-6465
Assessment Type
State Significant Development
Development Type
Coal Mining
Local Government Areas
Singleton Shire
Decision
Approved
Determination Date
Decider
IPC-N

Contact Planner

Name
Matthew Riley