State Significant Development
Mt Thorley Coal Mine Continuation
Singleton Shire
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Attachments & Resources
Request for SEARs (1)
Application (1)
SEARS (1)
EIS (14)
Agency Submissions (10)
Public Hearing (6)
Response to Submissions (2)
Assessment (9)
Recommendation (9)
Determination (3)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (2)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
Penalty Notice issued to Mt Thorley Pty Ltd (SSD-6465, Singleton Shire LGA)
On 13 August 2021, the Department issued a $15,000 Penalty Notice to Mt Thorley Pty Ltd (Mt Thorley) for failing to ensure that no mine water is discharged from the Mt Thorley Warkworth mine complex. A rainfall event on 4-6 January 2021 resulted in a mine water dam overtopping and mine water discharging from site. An investigation by the Department concluded that Mt Thorley failed to design and maintain the mine water dams to comply with water management performance measures. Mt Thorley has committed to reviewing their water management infrastructure and their Water Management Plan to ensure no mine water is discharged from site.
Inspections
1/06/2020
14/08/2020
14/12/2021
27/09/2022
2/09/2024
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Dick White
Object
Dick White
Message
Two Court decisions have been made against this proposal.
If this proposed expansion is allowed there will be further significant negative impacts arising from the continued and excessive levels of dust and noise. Health issues will escalate and we will witness permanent and irreparable damage to our immediate natural environment.
The negative impacts of mining borne by the Bulga community are of much greater significance than given credit.
People selected Bulga for the rural lifestyle and so the community is built around the common values of its residents.
These Core Values embraced by residents of the Bulga area seem to have no place or value with Rio Tinto or the NSW Government.
:
Pride Management
Object
Pride Management
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
The impact of this mine is too great on our homes and our lives; No amount of Noise suppression will change the impact; It is too close to our homes now; noise limits are too high;
Refer attached for further information.
Attachments
Heather Davis
Object
Heather Davis
Message
Attachments
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Marie Mitcgell
Object
Marie Mitcgell
Message
Attachments
Stewart Mitchell
Object
Stewart Mitchell
Message
Attachments
Mark Nolan
Support
Mark Nolan
Message
Attachments
Pauline Rayner
Object
Pauline Rayner
Message
Attachments
Ron Corino
Object
Ron Corino
Message
Attachments
Michael Rayner
Object
Michael Rayner
Message
Attachments
Monadelphous
Support
Monadelphous
Message
Attachments
Denis Maizey
Object
Denis Maizey
Doctors for the Environment Australia
Object
Doctors for the Environment Australia
Message
Attachments
Naomi Cupitt
Object
Naomi Cupitt
Message
Attachments
Bulga Coal Management Pty Ltd
Comment
Bulga Coal Management Pty Ltd
Orica
Support
Orica
Message
Attachments
Lock The Gate Alliance
Object
Lock The Gate Alliance
Message
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Attachments
Tanya Tlaskal
Object
Tanya Tlaskal
Message
WARKWORTH AND MOUNT THORLEY MINES CONTINUATION PROJECT (SSD 6464 and SSD 6465)
4 August, 2014
Tanya Tlaskal
313 Inlet Road, BULGA, NSW,2330
My name is Tanya Tlaskal and I am a resident of the village of Bulga.
I strongly oppose both the Warkworth (SSD 6464) and Mt Thorley (SSD 6465) Continuation Projects. No matter how Rio Tinto presents the project, it is still exactly the same old extension we have been fighting against for four years.
The NSW Land and Environment Court ruled in April 2013 in favour of Bulga village. Judge Preston found that the information used by Rio Tinto and NSW Planning in support of the project was wrong, and he overturned the approval.
When Rio Tinto and the NSW Government appealed that decision to the NSW Supreme Court (Court of Appeal), they lost. Two superior NSW courts have now ruled that Rio's plan to expand the Warkworth coal mine fails on merit.
We, people of Bugla were ecstatic, we have won, we thought that we can have some peace and to continue with our lives undisturbed. To our utter disbelief Rio Tinto have simply submitted the same mining application again. The old project has been split in two and the project name updated. However, these two projects (SSD 6464 and SSD 6465) are effectively the same project that has been rejected by two NSW courts (MP 09_0202).
That the Planning Department has even accepted Rio Tinto's application is a failure of procedural fairness, and makes a farce of the very process you are now asking us, the public, to participate in. We are being asked to make submissions on a project that has already been through this very same assessment process and failed - only to be resubmitted. We are being asked to submit to a process overseen by a Department that is clearly working closely with the proponent to get the project approved, and which got the decision wrong the first time around. There can be no faith in this process.
We will never stop fighting for our village, because it is a place we love and where we belong.
Our village's David and Goliath battle had become a symbol all over the world. We all know who had won in the end.