State Significant Development
Determination
Bylong Coal Mine
Mid-Western Regional
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Attachments & Resources
Application (2)
Request for DGRS (3)
SEARS (4)
EIS (41)
Public Hearing (43)
Response to Submissions (17)
Recommendation (31)
Determination (2)
Approved Documents
There are no post approval documents available
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
There are no inspections for this project.
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Showing 261 - 280 of 377 submissions
Mid_western Regional Council
Comment
Mid_western Regional Council
Comment
Rylstone-Kandos Anglican Parish
Object
Rylstone-Kandos Anglican Parish
Object
Name Withheld
Comment
Name Withheld
Comment
Merewether
,
New South Wales
Message
Public Submission Re: The KEPCO Bylong Coal Project
1. There is an unfunded and daunting legacy of mined landscapes in NSW. Few are rehabilitated to high value land use. All have changed the landscape hydrology and local water cycle in irretrievable ways. The internationally acclaimed Natural Sequence research undertaken by Peter Andrews OAM over fourty years in the Upper Bylong Valley has been declared by international expert researchers to be of national and international significance.
2. The Bylong Coal Project EIS as presented fails to recognise the full significance and value of the work of Peter Andrews on this natural hydration/natural fertility sequence experiment. This ground breaking work was known to the proponent prior to advancing the purchases of land and the proposal to mine, yet no apparent attempt has been made to adequately record or replicate the work in acknowledgement of what will be lost to the nation by proposed mining operations. The landscape rehydration patterns involved in the experiment are at a catchment scale, not a property scale. The Bylong EIS plays down the efficacy and the significance of this work.
3. It is therefore imperative that any approval to mine the Upper Bylong include:
i. a requirement to fund a thorough, complete and independent account of the process and practice of natural sequence landscape recovery and management as demonstrated over fourty years by Peter Andrews on Tarwyn Park and adjoining properties, including all areas in the valley used in the experiment over that time.
ii. all the lands in the Upper Bylong used to develop the experimental evidence for the Peter Andrews Natural Sequence (PANS) landscape recovery and management system be set aside and listed on the NSW and National Heritage registers. Such is there value
4. Of critical note is that these properties demonstrate a way in which the catchment hydrology functions as a whole system to secure fertility and soil moisture and to support ongoing biological productivity. The PANS has shown how saline and eroded lands can be recovered at low cost using natural hydration patterns and available biota from the top of the catchment to the natural floodplain. The value of this work to the nation and society is in excess of $A4bn in savings and $A411bn in recovered productivity.
5. The value of the Peter Andrews Natural Sequence as demonstrated in the Upper Bylong was known to the world and publically acknowledged prior to the purchase of coal rights in the valley. The value of this research and the demonstration property to the state, the nation and the world thus exceeds the proposed $A300m royalties to government from the proposed Bylong Coal Project.
6. As such, any approval to mine must also be accompanied by a requirement for the proponent to establish a surrogate PANS demonstration site in the NSW Upper Hunter Valley as determined by Peter Andrews and an independent research provider.
7. In addition, and in recognition of the value of Peter Andrews research to the state and nation, it is recommended that the NSW Government, Federal Government and the Korean Government each contribute $A12m to an independent public trust fund for the further development of the Peter Andrews Natural Sequence approach as a climate carbon management initiative (CCMI) for the international market; and that as a result of the PANS being known to the proponent prior to and property purchase or application to mine that this be a requirement of any approval to mine the Upper Bylong Valley in NSW.
This submission is made independent of any affiliations perceived or assumed. The essence of the submission has been publically stated in the national media.
1. There is an unfunded and daunting legacy of mined landscapes in NSW. Few are rehabilitated to high value land use. All have changed the landscape hydrology and local water cycle in irretrievable ways. The internationally acclaimed Natural Sequence research undertaken by Peter Andrews OAM over fourty years in the Upper Bylong Valley has been declared by international expert researchers to be of national and international significance.
2. The Bylong Coal Project EIS as presented fails to recognise the full significance and value of the work of Peter Andrews on this natural hydration/natural fertility sequence experiment. This ground breaking work was known to the proponent prior to advancing the purchases of land and the proposal to mine, yet no apparent attempt has been made to adequately record or replicate the work in acknowledgement of what will be lost to the nation by proposed mining operations. The landscape rehydration patterns involved in the experiment are at a catchment scale, not a property scale. The Bylong EIS plays down the efficacy and the significance of this work.
3. It is therefore imperative that any approval to mine the Upper Bylong include:
i. a requirement to fund a thorough, complete and independent account of the process and practice of natural sequence landscape recovery and management as demonstrated over fourty years by Peter Andrews on Tarwyn Park and adjoining properties, including all areas in the valley used in the experiment over that time.
ii. all the lands in the Upper Bylong used to develop the experimental evidence for the Peter Andrews Natural Sequence (PANS) landscape recovery and management system be set aside and listed on the NSW and National Heritage registers. Such is there value
4. Of critical note is that these properties demonstrate a way in which the catchment hydrology functions as a whole system to secure fertility and soil moisture and to support ongoing biological productivity. The PANS has shown how saline and eroded lands can be recovered at low cost using natural hydration patterns and available biota from the top of the catchment to the natural floodplain. The value of this work to the nation and society is in excess of $A4bn in savings and $A411bn in recovered productivity.
5. The value of the Peter Andrews Natural Sequence as demonstrated in the Upper Bylong was known to the world and publically acknowledged prior to the purchase of coal rights in the valley. The value of this research and the demonstration property to the state, the nation and the world thus exceeds the proposed $A300m royalties to government from the proposed Bylong Coal Project.
6. As such, any approval to mine must also be accompanied by a requirement for the proponent to establish a surrogate PANS demonstration site in the NSW Upper Hunter Valley as determined by Peter Andrews and an independent research provider.
7. In addition, and in recognition of the value of Peter Andrews research to the state and nation, it is recommended that the NSW Government, Federal Government and the Korean Government each contribute $A12m to an independent public trust fund for the further development of the Peter Andrews Natural Sequence approach as a climate carbon management initiative (CCMI) for the international market; and that as a result of the PANS being known to the proponent prior to and property purchase or application to mine that this be a requirement of any approval to mine the Upper Bylong Valley in NSW.
This submission is made independent of any affiliations perceived or assumed. The essence of the submission has been publically stated in the national media.
Attachments
Leigh Gardiner
Object
Leigh Gardiner
Object
Hunter Thoroughbred Breeders Association
Object
Hunter Thoroughbred Breeders Association
Object
Scone
,
New South Wales
Message
Noted. Submission attached.
Attachments
Hilary Crawford
Object
Hilary Crawford
Object
Rylstone
,
New South Wales
Message
See pdf file attached
Attachments
Bylong Valley Protection Alliance Inc
Object
Bylong Valley Protection Alliance Inc
Object
Bylong
,
New South Wales
Message
Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission in relation to KEPCO's proposed Bylong Coal Project.
The Bylong Valley Protection Alliance Inc objects to the proposal.
Our submission has been uploaded as a .pdf document.
The Bylong Valley Protection Alliance Inc objects to the proposal.
Our submission has been uploaded as a .pdf document.
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Bylong
,
New South Wales
Message
Submission attached as Pdf.
Please ensure no personal information is put onto website.
Please ensure no personal information is put onto website.
Attachments
Colin Imrie
Object
Colin Imrie
Object
Julia Imrie
Object
Julia Imrie
Object
Ulan
,
New South Wales
Message
The proposal by KEPCO to construct and operate an open cut and underground mine in the environmentally unique Bylong Valley, a highly productive agricultural `green-field' site rimmed by spectacular fragile sandstone cliffs and escarpments is neither a compatible nor sustainable land use based on environmental, social and economic reasoning.
(See attached Submission)
(See attached Submission)
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Jannali
,
New South Wales
Message
Objection based on retrograde step against halting climate change, devastation of environment, community disruption, and (apparently underestimated) impact on ground water.
Attachments
BCCAN
Object
BCCAN
Object
Bathurst
,
New South Wales
Message
Attached please find the submission from the Bathurst Community Climate Action Network.
Attachments
Environment Protection Authority
Comment
Environment Protection Authority
Comment
Bathurst
,
New South Wales
Message
See attached
Attachments
Office of Environment and Heritage
Comment
Office of Environment and Heritage
Comment
Dubbo
,
New South Wales
Message
See attached.
Attachments
Jennifer Burrell
Object
Jennifer Burrell
Object
NSW Roads and Maritime Services
Comment
NSW Roads and Maritime Services
Comment
Australian Rail Track Corporation
Comment
Australian Rail Track Corporation
Comment
Broadmeadow
,
New South Wales
Message
See attached.
Attachments
Division of Resources and Energy
Comment
Division of Resources and Energy
Comment
Sydney
,
New South Wales
Message
See attached.
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
camberwell
,
New South Wales
Message
See attachment.
Attachments
Lionel Braithwaite
Support
Lionel Braithwaite
Support
Bylong
,
New South Wales
Message
See attached.
Attachments
Pagination
Project Details
Application Number
SSD-6367
Assessment Type
State Significant Development
Development Type
Coal Mining
Local Government Areas
Mid-Western Regional
Decision
Refused
Determination Date
Decider
IPC-N
Contact Planner
Name
Stephen
O'Donoghue