State Significant Development
Eagleton Quarry Project
Port Stephens
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Due to a recent amendment to State Environmental Planning Policy (State and Regional Development) 2011 the consent authority for this project is now the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces. The Minister has delegated determination of the project to the Department
Proposed quarry to extract and process up to 600,000 tonnes of hard rock per annum for 30 years
Attachments & Resources
Notice of Exhibition (1)
Early Consultation (2)
Request for SEARs (1)
SEARs (3)
EIS (32)
Agency Submissions (11)
Response to Submissions (26)
Response to Submissions (3)
Agency Advice (28)
Amendments (13)
Additional Information (13)
Recommendation (2)
Determination (2)
Approved Documents
There are no post approval documents available
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
There are no inspections for this project.
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
GABRIELLE HICKLING
Object
GABRIELLE HICKLING
Message
Attachments
GILLIAN HICKLING
Object
GILLIAN HICKLING
PAIGE HONSON-SNEDDEN
Object
PAIGE HONSON-SNEDDEN
AMELIA JO LODGE
Object
AMELIA JO LODGE
NATASHA REDRIFF
Object
NATASHA REDRIFF
ELLEN SHEAHAN
Object
ELLEN SHEAHAN
LEE-ANNE WEST
Object
LEE-ANNE WEST
DALE WILLIAMS
Object
DALE WILLIAMS
TERRY SNOW
Object
TERRY SNOW
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Attachments
Bronwyn Larsen
Object
Bronwyn Larsen
Steven Larsen
Object
Steven Larsen
Save Balickera Inc.
Object
Save Balickera Inc.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Keeton Taylor
Object
Keeton Taylor
Message
Firstly, the environmental impact of the Eagleton Quarry Project cannot be ignored. The proposed quarry site is located in close proximity to sensitive ecosystems and endangered animals. The extraction of natural resources from this area would undoubtedly disrupt the delicate balance of these ecosystems, leading to irreversible damage to biodiversity and habitat loss for numerous species. Additionally, the increased noise, dust, and air pollution associated with quarry operations would further degrade the surrounding environment, negatively impacting the quality of life for both humans and wildlife.
Furthermore, the social implications of the Eagleton Quarry Project are concerning. The noise and vibrations generated by quarry operations would disrupt the peace and tranquility of these communities, affecting the mental and physical well-being of residents. Moreover, the increased heavy truck traffic associated with the transportation of extracted materials would pose a significant safety risk to pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists in the area. This project would not only compromise the safety and quality of life for local residents but also deter potential investors, businesses, and tourists from choosing our community as a desirable place to live, work, or visit.
From an economic standpoint, the Eagleton Quarry Project raises concerns about the long-term sustainability and economic viability of our community. While the project may promise short-term job opportunities, the negative impacts on other sectors such as tourism, agriculture, and real estate would far outweigh any temporary economic gains. Our community thrives on its natural beauty, recreational activities, and agricultural heritage, which would all be compromised by the presence of a quarry. The potential loss of these industries and the subsequent decline in property values would have long-lasting detrimental effects on our local economy.
In light of these concerns, I urge you to reconsider the Eagleton Quarry Project and explore alternative, more sustainable options for economic development. Our community deserves a future that prioritizes environmental preservation, social well-being, and long-term economic prosperity. I kindly request that you take into account the voices and concerns of the residents who will be directly affected by this project.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I trust that you will carefully consider the arguments presented and make a decision that aligns with the best interests of our community and the environment.
Negative impacts of quarries include:
1. Environmental degradation: Quarries can cause significant damage to the environment, including deforestation, loss of biodiversity, and destruction of natural habitats. The extraction of minerals and rocks can lead to soil erosion, sedimentation of water bodies, and contamination of groundwater.
2. Air pollution: Quarrying activities release dust and particulate matter into the air, which can have adverse effects on air quality. These particles can cause respiratory problems and contribute to the formation of smog.
3. Noise pollution: Quarry operations generate loud noise from blasting, drilling, and crushing activities. This can disrupt nearby communities and have negative impacts on human health, including hearing loss, stress, and sleep disturbances.
4. Visual impact: Quarries often have large excavations and machinery that can alter the natural landscape and scenic beauty of an area. This can negatively affect tourism and property values in nearby areas.
5. Water pollution: Quarrying can contaminate water sources through the discharge of pollutants such as sediment, chemicals, and heavy metals. This can harm aquatic ecosystems and affect the availability of clean water for human consumption.
6. Traffic congestion and accidents: Quarry operations can lead to increased traffic on local roads, which can cause congestion and accidents. The transportation of materials to and from the quarry can also contribute to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.
Sources:
1. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Quarries and Stone Cutting Industries in Palestine: A Case Study." Environmental Earth Sciences, by R. K. Yaseen et al. (2018).
2. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Quarries and Stone Cutting Industries in the Wadi Al-Allaqi Area, Eastern Desert, Egypt." Environmental Earth Sciences, by M. A. El-Sayed et al. (2019).
3. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Quarries and Stone Cutting Industries in the Middle East: A Case Study of Jordan." Environmental Earth Sciences, by M. Al-Hwaiti et al. (2019).
4. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Quarries and Stone Cutting Industries in the West Bank, Palestine." Environmental Earth Sciences, by M. A. El-Sayed et al. (2018).
5. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Quarries and Stone Cutting Industries in the Wadi Al-Allaqi Area, Eastern Desert, Egypt." Environmental Earth Sciences, by M. A. El-Sayed et al. (2019).
6. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Quarries and Stone Cutting Industries in the Middle East: A Case Study of Jordan." Environmental Earth Sciences, by M. Al-Hwaiti et al. (2019).
EcoNetwork Port Stephens Inc.
Object
EcoNetwork Port Stephens Inc.
Message
EcoNetwork Port Stephens Inc.
Object
EcoNetwork Port Stephens Inc.
Message
Charlee Connor
Object
Charlee Connor
Message
1. The cumulative impact of the Eagleton Quarry, the proposed Stoneridge Quarry and the and proposed extension of the Boral Seaham Quarry have not been assessed. The clearing of nearly 450 acres of land between them should not be considered on an individual basis.
2. Even without considering the cumulative impact of all 3 quarries, the biodiversity report for the Eagleton Quarry is well out of date. A new biodiversity impact report needs to be done so it is current before this quarry is considered.
3. The proposed traffic solution with an updated intersection at Italia Road and Pacific Highway has not been submitted for a DA. Any further quarry developments on Italia Road should not be considered, let alone approved, until a DA for the intersection update is approved. The current intersection is already too dangerous to contemplate any more trucks being added to Italia Road.
Andrew Kidd
Object
Andrew Kidd
Message
The area is semi-rural and the proposal will change the ambience and character, the area will be transformed from a rural bush setting and country road into a massive hole in the ground and major haulage route.
The proposal will clear almost 30 hectares of forestry resulting in loss of natural habitat and biodiversity.
Proposed operations will create noise & dust interfering with the local relaxed country lifestyle.