Skip to main content

State Significant Development

Exhibition

Eastern Creek Energy from Waste Facility

Blacktown

Current Status: Exhibition

Interact with the stages for their names

  1. SEARs
  2. Prepare EIS
  3. Exhibition
  4. Collate Submissions
  5. Response to Submissions
  6. Assessment
  7. Recommendation
  8. Determination

** Exhibition Extended to 21 June 2022**

The Applicant has appealed the IPC's refusal of the proposal in the L&E Court. The Court has allowed the applicant to amend its application and ordered it be exhibited on the Major Projects planning portal.

Attachments & Resources

Notice of Exhibition (1)

Notice of Exhibition_13042022_081934

Request for SEARs (1)

SA5220-Preliminary EIS Final 311013.pdf

SEARS (1)

Eastern Creek Energy from Waste DGRs.pdf

EIS (62)

16. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX G_ Draft Plan of Subdivision...
21. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX L_ Local Air Quality and Gre...
40. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX T_ ACHAR Addendum_low res_Pa...
30. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX O_ Human Health Risk Assessm...
51. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX W_ Phase 2 Detailed Site Inv...
48. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX W_ Phase 1 Preliminary Site ...
25. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX L_ Local Air Quality and Gre...
19. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX J_ CIV.pdf
59. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX CC_ Construction Environment...
50. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX W_ Phase 2 Detailed Site Inv...
42. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX T_ ACHAR Addendum_low res_Pa...
02. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX A_ Responses to Agency ToA c...
37. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX S_ Aboriginal Archaeological...
05. 2015-04-24 APPENDIX D_ Architectural Design Repo...
60. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX DD_ Concept Design Report.pdf
39. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX T_ ACHAR Addendum_low res_Pa...
09. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX E_ Landscape Report and Plan...
53. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX X_ Community Communication a...
56. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX Z_ Preliminary Hazard Analys...
04. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX C_ Director General's Requir...
01. 2015-04-28 Environmental Impact Statement.pdf
22. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX L_ Local Air Quality and Gre...
20. 2015-04-24 APPENDIX K_ Waste Management Report.pdf
12. 2015-04-24 APPENDIX F_ Civil and Stormwater Plan...
11. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX E_ Landscape Report and Plan...
47. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX W_ Phase 1 Preliminary Site ...
35. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX R_ Traffic Report.pdf
23. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX L_ Local Air Quality and Gre...
49. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX W_ Phase 2 Detailed Site Inv...
57. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX AA_ Flood Report (Brown).pdf
34. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX Q_ Soil and Water Report.pdf
52. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX X_ Community Communication a...
24. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX L_ Local Air Quality and Gre...
36. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX R_ Traffic Report_appendices...
03. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX B_ Site Survey.pdf
07. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX D_Architectural Plans_Part 2...
00. Owners consent and political donations disclosur...
54. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX Y_ Consultation with Departm...
13. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX F_ Civil and Stormwater Plan...
10. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX E_ Landscape Report and Plan...
32. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX O_ Human Health Risk Assessm...
15. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX F_ Civil Infrastructure Repo...
14. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX F_ Civil and Stormwater Plan...
02. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX A_ Peer review letter Rambol...
46. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX W_ Phase 1 Preliminary Site ...
41. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX T_ ACHAR Addendum_low res_Pa...
06. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX D_Architectural Plans_Part 1...
43. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX T_ ACHAR Addendum_low res_Pa...
29. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX O_ Human Health Risk Assessm...
27. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX N_ Ozone Impact Assessment_P...
18. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX I_ Visual Impact Assessment.pdf
26. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX M_ Odour Assessment.pdf
17. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX H_ Flora and Fauna Report.pdf
33. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX P_ Noise Impact Assessment.pdf
45. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX V_ Heritage Impact Statement...
31. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX O_ Human Health Risk Assessm...
44. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX U_ Test Excavation Report.pdf
28. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX N_ Ozone Impact Assessment_P...
55. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX Y_ Consultation with NSW Hea...
08. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX D_Architectural Plans_Part 3...
38. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX T_ ACHAR.pdf
58. 2015-04-17 APPENDIX BB_ Bushfire Assessment Repo...

Engagements (1)

FAQs Eastern Creek February 2017.pdf

Response to Submissions (139)

APPENDIX U_ Non-Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Impact ...
EPA Submission_ Cover Letter_ Eastern Creek EfW RTS_...
NSW Health Submission_ Response to Submissions_ EfW...
EPA Submission_ Attachment E_ NSW EPA_ Greenhouse Ga...
EPA Submission_ Attachment D_ NSW EPA_ Human Health ...
EPA Submission_ Attachment C_ EnRiskS Pty Ltd_ Human...
EPA Submission_ Attachment A_ NSW EPA_ Energy from W...
Appendix D_Project Definition Brief_Appendix 1.pdf
Appendix CC_Letter from Urbis re Social Licence and ...
Appendix J_ MRA Feedstock Review_Part2.pdf
Appendix D_ Project Definition Brief.pdf
Appendix R_ Ozone Impact Assessment.pdf
Appendix V_ Letter_ Preliminary Hazard Analysis and ...
Appendix M_ Letter_ Best Available Technology Evalua...
Appendix O_ Human Health Risk Assessment_Part3.pdf
Appendix A_Response to Submissions Table_Government ...
Appendix O_ Human Health Risk Assessment_Part4.pdf
Appendix V_Preliminary Hazard Assessment Review_Core...
Appendix W_ Airspace Operations Assessment.pdf
Appendix E- Updated Architectural Plan Set_Part2.pdf
APPENDIX CC_ Project Definition Brief.pdf
Appendix O_Noise and Vibration Assessment.pdf
Appendix N_Human Health Risk Assessment_Part3.pdf
Appendix N_Human Health Risk Assessment_Part1.pdf
Appendix_HH6_ Part 1_Engineering Response.pdf
Appendix HH3_Flora and Fauna Response.pdf
Appendix HH1_ Community Submissions Response Table.pdf
APPENDIX X2_ Consultation with NSW Health.pdf
APPENDIX V2_ Phase 2 Detailed Site Investigation_Par...
APPENDIX C3_ Layout Elevation_Part1.pdf
APPENDIX C5_ Colours and Materials.pdf
APPENDIX E4_ Civil Infrastructure and Services Repor...
APPENDIX E3_ Civil and Stormwater Plans_Part 3.pdf
APPENDIX E2_ Civil and Stormwater Plans_Part 2.pdf
Appendix M_Ozone Impact Assessment.pdf
Appendix EE_Airspace Operations Assessment.pdf
APPENDIX T_ Aboriginal Archaeology Test Excavation R...
Amended EIS_ Eastern Creek Energy from Waste_ Volum...
Appendix GG3_Email Response_CASA.pdf
Appendix N_Human Health Risk Assessment_Part2.pdf
Appendix K_Air Quality Impact and Greenhouse Gas Ass...
Appendix K_Air Quality Impact and Greenhouse Gas Ass...
Appendix_HH4_ Soil and Water Report Response.pdf
Appendix HH2_Agency and Organisation Reponse.pdf
APPENDIX W2_ Community Communication and Consultatio...
APPENDIX X1_ Consultation with DIRD.pdf
APPENDIX V1B_ Phase 1 Preliminary Site Investigation...
APPENDIX V2_ Phase 2 Detailed Site Investigation_Par...
Appendix DD.4_Ash Output Quantities.pdf
APPENDIX D2_ Landscape Plans_Part 2 of 2.pdf
APPENDIX C3_ Layout Elevation_Part2.pdf
APPENDIX D1_ Landscape Plans_Part 1 of 2.pdf
Appendix FF_Plume Rise Assessment.pdf
Appendix I_ CIV Report.pdf
Appendix II_Ongoing Community Consultation and Comm...
Appendix BB_ Construction Environmental Management P...
Appendix J_Waste Management Assessment.pdf
APPENDIX Y_ Preliminary Hazard Analysis and Fire Ris...
EPA Submission_ Attachment B_ NSW EPA_ Air Quality &...
Appendix N_Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment...
Appendix BB_ Perched Groundwater and Surface Water A...
Appendix C_ CIV Report.pdf
Appendix H_ Civil Infrastructure Report.pdf
Appendix F_ Letter_ Construction Environmental Manag...
Appendix I_Plan of Subdivision_LandPartners.pdf
Appendix G1_ Bushfire Assessment Report.pdf
Appendix X_Proof of Performance_O&M Corporate Suppor...
Appendix P_ Noise Assessment.pdf
Appendix K_Asbestos Technical Memo_Pacific Environme...
APPENDIX R_ GML Aboriginal Archaeological Technical ...
Appendix GG2_Email Response Air Services Australia.pdf
APPENDIX P_ Soil and Water Report.pdf
Appendix L_Odour Report.pdf
Appendix KK_ BAT Evaluation.pdf
Appendix K_Air Quality Impact and Greenhouse Gas Ass...
APPENDIX V2_ Phase 2 Detailed Site Investigation_Par...
APPENDIX D1_ Landscape Plans_Part 1 of 2-1.pdf
APPENDIX D3_ Landscape Report.pdf
Appendix DD.6_Floc Waste Processing, Analysis and co...
APPENDIX C2_ Vehicle Movements.pdf
APPENDIX C6_ Artist Impression.pdf
APPENDIX S2_ ACHAR Addendum_Part 2.pdf
APPENDIX C1_ Architectural Design Report.pdf
APPENDIX C4_ Signage Plan.pdf
Appendix LL.2 _HZI Sequence of Testing.pdf
Appendix F_Amended Concept Plan of Subdivision.pdf
Appendix AA_ Bushfire Assessment Report.pdf
APPENDIX G_ Flora and Fauna Report.pdf
Appendix CC_Letter from Urbis re Social Licence - 11...
Appendix K_Asbestos Technical Memo_Ramboll 2017.pdf
Appendix G_ Letter_ Abel Ecology.pdf
Appendix U1_Traffic Response_Traffix 2017.pdf
Appendix X1_Proof of Performance_Job Descriptions Ta...
Appendix T1_ Concept Landscape Plan.pdf
Appendix Z_ Letter_ Contamination Assessment.pdf
Appendix E- Updated Architectural Plan Set_Part1.pdf
Appendix H1_ Civil Infrastructure Works Package_Part...
Appendix J_ MRA Feedstock Review_Part1.pdf
Appendix Q_ Odour Report.pdf
Appendix AA_ Letter_ NonAboriginal Cultural Heritage...
Appendix B_Response to Submissions Table_Community.pdf
Appendix Y_ Letter_ Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Ass...
Appendix O_ Human Health Risk Assessment_Part1.pdf
Appendix O_ Human Health Risk Assessment_Part2.pdf
Appendix G2_Biodiversity Offset Strategy_Abel Ecolog...
Appendix L_ Plume Rise Assessment.pdf
Appendix L1_Plume Rise Assessment_Ramboll 2017.pdf
APPENDIX Q_ Traffic Impact Assement.pdf
Amended EIS_ Eastern Creek Energy from Waste_ Volum...
Appendix GG1_Email Response Advice_Bankstown Airport...
Appendix_HH6_Part 2_Engineering Response.pdf
Appendix_HH5_DADI Response.pdf
APPENDIX V1A_ Phase 1 Preliminary Site Investigation...
APPENDIX W1_ Community Communication and Consultatio...
APPENDIX S5 _ ACHAR Addendum_Part 5.pdf
Appendix DD.5 Treated Wood Waste.pdf
Appendix LL.1_ HZI_Performance Tests.pdf
APPENDIX S4 _ ACHAR Addendum_Part 4.pdf
APPENDIX E1_ Civil and Stormwater Plans_Part 1.pdf
Appendix DD.3_ Design Fuel Mix_Concept to Definition...
APPENDIX S3 _ ACHAR Addendum_Part 3.pdf
Appendix DD.2_EfW Operating Temperature.pdf
Appendix DD.1 Reference Facilities.pdf
APPENDIX S1_ ACHAR Addendum_Part 1.pdf
Appendix Z_Browns Flood Report.pdf
Appendix H_ Visual Impact Assessment.pdf
Appendix B_ Director General's Requirements.pdf
Appendix A_ Site Survey.pdf
Penrith City Council Submission on RTS_~tment of Pla...
Blacktown City Council Submission on RTS.PDF
Appendix D_Project Definition Brief_Appendix 2.pdf
A Response to Submissions on the Amended EIS - Easte...
Appendix U_ Letter_ Traffic Impact Assessment.pdf
Appendix S_ Visual Impact Assessment_Part3.pdf
Appendix H1_ Civil Infrastructure Works Package_Part...
Appendix T_ Concept Landscape Plan Report.pdf
Appendix X2_Proof of Performance_O&M Continuous Trai...
Appendix S_ Visual Impact Assessment_Part1.pdf
Appendix S_ Visual Impact Assessment_Part2.pdf

Assessment (7)

ARUP Addendum to Eastern Creek Energy from Waste RTS...
Key queries regarding amended EIS 160317.pdf
Independent review of human health risk assessment.pdf
Independent review of Environmental Impact Statement...
EnRisks Letter Report - Eastern Creek Energy from Wa...
ARUP Eastern Creek EfW RTS Merit Review - Final - Ma...
Environmental Risk Sciences Pty Ltd_ Review of HHRA_...

Amendments (7)

Amended Application - Planning Statement
Amended Application - App A - MRA TNG Feedstock Review_V7
Amended Application - App B - HZI Review
Amended Application - App C - TNG Feedstock Review AQ L2 Final
Amended Application - App D - TNG Feedstock Review GHG L2 Final
Amended Application - App E - TNG Feedstock Review Odour L1 Final
Amended Application - App F - AECOM Ltr Removal of FLOC

Recommendation (2)

Assessment Report - 2018 - Eastern Creek EfW - SSD 6...
DOC18 219107 Instrument of Refusal_ Eastern Creek E...

Determination (3)

IPC Instrument of Refusal_ Eastern Creek Energy from...
IPC Statement of Reasons_ Eastern Creek Energy from ...
Notice of Decision_ Eastern Creek Energy from Waste_...

Submissions

Filters
Showing 41 - 60 of 1089 submissions
Environment Protection Authority
Object
Sydney South , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
Sydney Airport Corporation Limited
Comment
Sydney International Terminal , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
NSW Health Western Sydney Local Health District
Object
Wentworthville , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
Penrith City Council
Comment
Penrith , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
DPI
Comment
Sydney , New South Wales
Message
See attached.
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Minchinbury , New South Wales
Message
I am strongly object to the proposal of Eastern Creek Energy from Waste Facility.
Noise pollution,is rave in Minchinbury now, and smell, dust, and presence of cockroaches.I am resident since 1984 and newer we have such predicament as of last 10 years.
In resent Years we can't open window during the night because noise is prevent you from sleep, and temperature in Western suburbs is greater than 10 years ago.
We have Airport in Badgerys Creek looming on our heads and this now.
I would invite all Council and N.S.W. politicians to spend night with us in 30 degrees heat at night and constant noise, with closed window and we will see , how they sleep.
Karina Brown
Object
Kings park , New South Wales
Message
It is clear that the proposed waste facility would be a major health risk to the surrounding areas. It is evident from the information provided that it cannot be proved the incinerator is safe to the surrounding houses, schools or businesses. The nanoparticles and dioxins created cannot be disposed of and are known to enter the bloodstream easily and create cell damage. Can you be certain birth defects and cancer rates will not increase due to this establishment?
Incinerators are prone to deterioration after 3 years, with maintenence at a staggering 70% of its original cost. Who will foot the bill?
I'd prefer to see a waste facility located in an isolated location that creates jobs (by jobs I mean in the 100's not just 2 figures).

Name Withheld
Object
Erskine Park , New South Wales
Message
I object to this being built so close to residential
Name Withheld
Object
St Clair , New South Wales
Message
This is too close to a residential area and the schools on Bakers Lane, Kemps Creek.
Name Withheld
Object
Erskine Park , New South Wales
Message
The surrounding suburbs have some of NSW highest incidences of respiratory problems and allergies. This location is not in the best interests of this locality by any stretch of the imagination. This will put additional stresses on the already overwhelmed local health workers and providers.
Phil Upton
Object
Minchinbury , New South Wales
Message
I am strongly against the Incinerator Power Plant Development.
I have been a resident of Minchinbury for 28 years and watched our children and family grow fit and healthy. We have suffered dust and blasting from the Quarry and Crushing of Rock. The Quarry Life ended and should be filled and parkland put in its place. This New Development is in the wrong place and one kilometer from my door. Far to close for this type of Toxic Activity and cause of angst in my retiring years. To have 4 stacks of 103 meter high burning day and night is beyond reproach. They say they are clean burning. That is not True. All Stacks generate heat and fumes regardless. The Volume of Trucks not only going to the Site but that feed the Warehousing Precinct is massive now.
We have OneSteel belching out steam and fumes, The Brickwork Business at Eastern Creek and Cecil Hills all sending fumes and heat into the air fowling Sydney Basins Air even more. The Dada facility has no water carts or misting on the stockpiles and conveyors now and that is breathed in. The whole thing is a dangerous folly that should not go ahead! No Incinerator Please!
Name Withheld
Object
Kings Park , New South Wales
Message
I object to the proposed incinerator
Name Withheld
Object
Doonside , New South Wales
Message
The proposal to build and operate a large waste disposal facility that Next Generation NSW at Eastern Creek in Western Sydney is ridiculous. Some points are quite simply put below:
1) The facility is too close to residential development
2) The scale is too large
3) Polution of this facility will impact many people in Western Sydney
4) if the Blacktown council has rejected it on a number of occasions there is a clear point that it is not good for the area.

If this facility is "needed" for Sydney then it should be placed well clear of residential locations and will the full concent of thd council and lkcal community.

Yours sincerely
A very concered local
Name Withheld
Object
Minchinbury , New South Wales
Message
I am very concerned about the level of pollutants that will be omitted from this plant. Since the waste management plant has opened we have seen an increase in dust particles in the air, and in our homes,which has affected our breathing. Burning waste will only increase this pollution and affect our health even more. It's interesting that the NSW Health department and Blacktown City Council were both against this proposal. I work at a local school and have seen an increase of students affected by asthma since the waste management plant opened. I am worried for their health once this incinerator operates. Im sure there is a better place to build this incinerator (eg Badgerys Creek) where there are no residential areas within less than 5km away. Consider the health of the surrounding area's residents...residents of nursing homes, schools, preschools, homes, workplaces...all within less than 5 kms away from this site....
Name Withheld
Object
Erskine Park , New South Wales
Message
Another dumping ground for the city's waste being forced on to the western suburbs. You take us for fools, and it is hugely disappointing, this is not an appropriate site based on past history with significance odour related issues from the Wallgrove Road Disposal facility. While it is a different method it is hard to fathom how the incineration of waste will not adversely affect close by neighbouring residents in Minchinbury, Erskine Park and St Clair. The site will provide very few jobs of which i know for fact, is in the region of about 30, and will bring in significant number of additional vehicle movements. Any visit to the M4 on and off ramps from Penrith to Blacktown will indicate that the capacity has been under pressure for over 5 years.

Given the submission and consultation process is basically arbitary and the government would have already formed their view with no real serious contemplation of local residents i suppose i'll accept that me and my family of small children will have to accept this terrible facility right amoungst one of the only remaining bits of greenery in our suburb, but how about in exchange we get a West Bound on ramp put on the M4, and that if the facility is to be there that the neighbouring local Council's are mandated to use the facility and are provided a concessional rate for dumping which can then translate into a cheaper domestic waste charge for residents. If the bureaucrat who reads this cares to pass on to the government, if they can achieve even one of those i will vote them back in, otherwise i'm jumping ship with most other people. Purple Monkey Dishwasher.
Roger McPherson
Object
Minchinbury , New South Wales
Message
We "Object" to this development. Why has the Council told the developer to go back and do more work, this gives me the impression Council may have already formed an opinion on this development? Blacktown Councils answer to this development should be a flat "NO".

We agree with all the other submissions from both our friends and other concerned residents. Ultimately we love where we live and our community and the people that make up that community. We have always said this is our "Castle" and would be here for ever.

What right has Next Generation got to impact on our quality of life, to play roulette with the health of our children just to line their own pockets with greed. When we purchased our home in Minchinbury nearly 15 years ago, we thought we had won the lottery - our piece of paradise. If this development goes ahead we are very concerned our way of life will be significantly changed.

We live in a quiet cul de sac and love nothing better than spending time outside on our neighbours lawn enjoying their company and the wonderful view of the neighbourhood.
To have 2 huge dirty smoke stacks bellowing huge amounts of potentially toxic waste into the air 24 hours a day nonstop for 30 plus years will end that tradition. We will be prisoners in our own home, shut indoors away from the outside stench. We have already endured years of putrid smell from the other waste facilities within the area which both the EPA and facility operations have failed to stop.

Australia is a HUGE country with ample area this type of development could be better suited, so why not go further west away from suburbia? There is NO way this type of development would be put around the Eastern and Northern suburbs of Sydney.

My question is; what will happen to our family's health and that of our home in the future? People can be voted in and out of office every couple of years, however a development like this will have a long lasting impact on the residents and land values for 30 plus years.

Please vote "NO" to this development!
Mohammad Khan
Object
MINCHINBURY , New South Wales
Message
I still strongly object the proposed development as previously mentioned issues are not addressed properly in the "Amended Environment Impact Statement" . Could I please also request Department of Planning to conduct their own internal assessment to ensure that concerns raised by residents are addressed clearly and also please do provide the response to each objection so its transparent rather than releasing a generic statement.


Submission
I object the proposed development due to following critical reasons;

1.The proposed site is very close to residential area.
2.Noise pollution will increase and could cause long term medical conditions.
3.The turbine vibration has the potential to damage the structure of our house and also the surrounding houses.
4.The release of chemical odours from the site will make the living conditions unbearable and unhealthy for us and also for the surrounding residents and the environment.
5.I have two sick children in the house, my daughter is asthmatic. This development has the potential to cause long term harm to her asthma.
6.The value of our residential property will go down causing enormous financial loss.
Name Withheld
Object
Minchinbury , New South Wales
Message
The attached amended DA does not correctly identify the distance between the residential area of Minchinbury and the proposal.

The residential area, including sporting fields, a primary school, various child care facilities etc is LESS than 500metres from the DA Proposal.

The health effects stated in the EIS state "The proposed Facility may release substances to atmosphere which have the potential to harm human health." this DA should not be approved when it's so close to residential areas.

There is no evidence there will be no concern for human health risk, air quality and greenhouse gases, odour, ozone, traffic, waste management, noise and vibration.

This applicant, Ian Malouf, and Boiling Pty Ltd - a firm associated with Dial a Dump owner Ian Malouf, has already received a large number of EPA breaches over the past few years for non compliances. This person is NOT a fit and proper person to be proposing such a large, health and environmental affecting development.

The application has not demonstrated that the proposal will not result in significant visual impacts when viewed from within Erskine Park. In this regard, the visual impact assessment has not considered the impact of the development on views from within the property boundaries of residential development sites. In particular, properties 7 - 10 Hocking Place & 167- 187 Swallow Drive, Erskine Park.

I object to this DA and trust this NSW Liberal Government will make the right decision to reject this proposal based on the lack of evidence for health concerns and incorrect information rather than corporate profit political donations and other influencing factors that may be put ahead of community rights and concerns.
Name Withheld
Object
minchinbury , New South Wales
Message
This DA is LESS than 500metres from our homes. The information on the DA is incorrect.

The health effects stated in the EIS state "The proposed Facility may release substances to atmosphere which have the potential to harm human health." For this reason ALONE this DA should not be approved when it's so close to residential areas.

There is enough evidence from overseas that suggests this type of DA will harm the health of nearby businesses (workers) and residential homes. There is no evidence there will be no concern for human health risk, air quality and greenhouse gases, odour, ozone, traffic, waste management, noise and vibration.

Ian Malouf has already polluted Minchinbury with increased dust, noise and smells from his current landfill. He is NOT a fit and proper person to be proposing such a large, health and environmental affecting development having had so many ongoing EPA breaches previously and ongoing.

The application has not demonstrated that the proposal will not result in significant visual impacts when viewed from within Erskine Park. In this regard, the visual impact assessment has not considered the impact of the development on views from within the property boundaries of residential development sites. In particular, properties 7 - 10 Hocking Place & 167- 187 Swallow Drive, Erskine Park.

He donates a lot of money to the NSW Liberal party. This is a conflict of interest

I object to this DA and trust this NSW Liberal Government will make the right decision to reject this proposal based on the lack of evidence for health concerns and incorrect information rather than corporate profit political donations and other influencing factors that may be put ahead of community rights and concerns.
Christine Shaw
Object
South Penrith , New South Wales
Message
I wish to register my objection to this proposal. Having a history of asthma in my family, I have tried to live a good life - never smoked, eat well. We moved to the outskirts of Sydney ( Penrith) 19 years ago to bring our children up in a healthy environment, close to the Blue Mountains and Nepean River where we could enjoy recreational activities as a family. After all the good we have done for our family, to have a toxic waste incinerator to be be developed no more than 8 kilometres from our home upsets me to the core. It is disgraceful that this proposal is even being considered being that the Baadgery Creek airport has been thrust upon us and that will already add huge amounts of heavy metal particles and other pollutants into the air and to then have this in amongst the most populated areas of Sydney is criminal

Pagination

Project Details

Application Number
SSD-6236
Assessment Type
State Significant Development
Development Type
Waste collection, treatment and disposal
Local Government Areas
Blacktown

Contact Planner

Name
Sally Munk